Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm

    Possibly being left on a decoy plane  to die by her boss has made her rethink some things.

Hey Smelly Snatch

Possibly?....you playing pretend again?

if playing pretend is all you got left...what other choice do you have?


 

nefarious101 » 13 Aug 2026, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 6:04 am

Hey Smelly Snatch

Possibly?....you playing pretend again?

if playing pretend is all you got left...what other choice do you have?

He's possibly a 7' Lumberjack,  but more likely an undersized runt with an ego problem. 

All I need is a reply from Connie and the queenbee and I've hit all the bases.
These MAGAts sure make trolling easy.

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2026, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 5:52 am

I cannot be the best mom my two young children deserve while my boss is willing to use me as chum

When you devote your biological time trying to prove genetics cannot be the only source of eternal life separating current population daily here, when do you have time be be all you became since conception?

Squatchman » 13 Aug 2026, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 6:13 am

All I need is a reply from Connie and the queenbee and I've hit all the bases.
These MAGAts sure make trolling easy.

How many bases are there to define every reality humanity created since dawn of civilization within this one species?

RebelGator » 13 Aug 2026, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 6:11 am

He's possibly a 7' Lumberjack,  but more likely an undersized runt with an ego problem.

Smelly Snatch isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer....

he's more like a soup spoon with a hole in it

Squatchman » 12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm

    Possibly being left on a decoy plane  to die by her boss has made her rethink some things.

Not the President’s decision.  That is the Secret Services decision.

Huey » 13 Aug 2026, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 6:57 am

Not the President’s decision.  That is the Secret Services decision.

I find it rich with all these hunyucks / MSM attention to this, undecided whether it’s a big deal or a nothing burger where it’s just a procedural thingy…to which I’m sure something like it has happened before…  

knowing johnny, he’s probably on a bender or the ICU over this…

ROG62 » 13 Aug 2026, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 8:12 am

I find it rich with all these hunyucks / MSM attention to this, undecided whether it’s a big deal or a nothing burger where it’s just a procedural thingy…to which I’m sure something like it has happened before…  

knowing johnny, he’s probably on a bender or the ICU over this…

 

It is like in his first term you had the riots outside the WH over Floyd when the SS moved him to the bunker for about an hour.  Not his decision.  Not everyone was sent to the bunker.  
 

Not enough time in the day for career and spending time on her back getting plowed

ROG62 » 13 Aug 2026, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 8:12 am

knowing johnny, he’s probably on a bender or the ICU over this…

More than likely, he's already been a victim of workplace violence.   
 

Squatchman » 12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Aug 2026, 9:38 pm

    Possibly being left on a decoy plane  to die by her boss has made her rethink some things.

The sad part of this ^^^ is that it's probably true. No exaggeration. 

RebelGator » 13 Aug 2026, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 8:50 am

More than likely, he's already been a victim of workplace violence.

  could very well be…

Huey » 13 Aug 2026, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 8:36 am

It is like in his first term you had the riots outside the WH over Floyd when the SS moved him to the bunker for about an hour.  Not his decision.  Not everyone was sent to the bunker.

oh yeah…he “cowered” then as well…  

Vegas » 13 Aug 2026, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 9:34 am

The sad part of this ^^^ is that it's probably true. No exaggeration.

   It just might be. I don't know of a single person that would continue working for someone that doesn't take their employees safety seriously. 
  And he took his personal assistant with him so Leavitt knows exactly where she stands. She's expendable,knows it now and got out.
  I bet Rubio and Miller are none too happy or secure in their jobs either. Also expendable.
Trump showed his whole staff and cabinet members just how much he thinks about them.
 I'm going out on a limb and saying someone or a few someones will stab trump in the back in the future.

 

Squatchman » 13 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm

   It just might be. I don't know of a single person that would continue working for someone that doesn't take their employees safety seriously. 
  And he took his personal assistant with him so Leavitt knows exactly where she stands. She's expendable,knows it now and got out.
  I bet Rubio and Miller are none too happy or secure in their jobs either. Also expendable.
Trump showed his whole staff and cabinet members just how much he thinks about them.
 I'm going out on a limb and saying someone or a few someones will stab trump in the back in the future.

 

 

Again, Trump, like any President, is not the decision maker on when to evacuate.  And those that work for the President understand the risks.
 

Squatchman » 13 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 1:38 pm

   It just might be. I don't know of a single person that would continue working for someone that doesn't take their employees safety seriously. 
  And he took his personal assistant with him so Leavitt knows exactly where she stands. She's expendable,knows it now and got out.
  I bet Rubio and Miller are none too happy or secure in their jobs either. Also expendable.
Trump showed his whole staff and cabinet members just how much he thinks about them.
 I'm going out on a limb and saying someone or a few someones will stab trump in the back in the future.

I noticed a pattern with Trump. This pattern goes back to the 80s. Usually people can only tolerate him for no more than a year. Every close ally he has had in business and in politics has fallen through usually in a year's time. 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2026, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 5:35 am

Huey avatar Huey +1 20 minutes ago

ROG62 avatar ROG62 +1 Today, 12:16 am


Know your maggots...

 

WOW!  You obsession with  me is growing.

AI Overview
The U.S. Secret Service, in coordination with the military, does use decoy aircraft and misdirection strategies during high-threat security operations. [1, 2]

Recent Operations

• Turkey Departure (July 2026): Officials confirmed an operation where President Donald Trump boarded the traditional Air Force One in plain sight at an airport in Ankara following a NATO summit. [1, 2, 3]

• The Transfer: Minutes after boarding, Trump was secretly moved off the plane via a catering truck and transferred to a separate military aircraft (a C-32A) due to concerns regarding a potential security threat. [1, 2, 3]

• Decoy Status: The original Boeing aircraft departed with traveling journalists, staff, and select cabinet members still on board, serving as an unwitting decoy while the president traveled on the separate flight. [1, 2, 3]

Security Context

• According to BBC reporting on presidential Decoys to hide presidents, deceptive routing and mislead-and-evade strategies have a long history in presidential protection. [1]

• Similar large-scale or localized misdirections (such as utilizing duplicate limousines or "Beasts" in motorcades) are standard protocols implemented when specific credible threats arise

 

Huey » 13 Aug 2026, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 2:35 pm

WOW!  You obsession with  me is growing.

AI Overview
The U.S. Secret Service, in coordination with the military, does use decoy aircraft and misdirection strategies during high-threat security operations. [1,
2]

Are you cherry picking what you're applauding?

Huey » 13 Aug 2026, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2026, 6:57 am

Not the President’s decision.  That is the Secret Services decision.

We heard that the last time a low T POTUS ran like a bitch.