Liberal Forum

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:11 pm

For the hundredth time, one family, multiple design.  

There's no such thing...

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:10 am

The Wolfsburg Volkswagen Plant traditionally operates four main assembly lines, though ongoing factory restructuring and transitions toward electric vehicle production involve plans to streamline and reduce active configuration down to two primary lines.

brown, You have good reason to hate yourself...

multiple lines are non sequitur…

yes, brown, they continue to retool as the documentary I watched showed the multiple models, random counts in production one one line….how many lines they have wasn’t specified as this was all about vehicle production…

nod…

Squatchman » 17 Aug 2026, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 11:02 am

  Congrats! You get the first **** off of the thread.

   

ROG62 » 17 Aug 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:16 pm

brown, You have good reason to hate yourself...

multiple lines are non sequitur…

yes, brown, they continue to retool as the documentary I watched showed the multiple models, random counts in production one one line….how many lines they have wasn’t specified as this was all about vehicle production…

nod…

The dislike of Trump is not unjustified.

Anyone who likes him at this point is creepy stupid ROG

He has sold America's Soul for his benefit. You have been pwnd..




 

ROG62 » 17 Aug 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:16 pm

brown, You have good reason to hate yourself...

multiple lines are non sequitur…


 

You are, quite literally, too stupid to participate. 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:06 pm

Just delete facts.

try to keep it relevant. 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:22 pm

You are, quite literally, too stupid to participate.

brownie, pick up your limbs and **** off…go hassle your neighbor…I hear he’s got “enforcement grade” pepper spray…      

#****
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:23 pm

try to keep it relevant. 

 

I accept your surrender since your debate style is to delete objective facts.

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:36 pm

I accept your surrender since your debate style is to delete objective facts.

Are they relevant?

You LIE about objective facts.

That's relevant 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am

This is nonsense.

The "civilian" AR-15 is a variant of the original AR-15 design, modified so as not to be a machine gun subject to the 1934 regs.

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

This terminology debate is irrelevant. The AR-15's design and development predates the etymological discussion. The antecedent is German.




 

 

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

Even the government does not consider them NFA weapons.  Assault rifles are considered NFA weapons.  You can legally own a fully automatic assault rifle only if it was manufactured and registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record prior to May 19, 1986, requiring an extensive background check, a $200 tax stamp, and a purchase price often exceeding $15,000.

AI Overview

Standard semi-automatic AR-15–style rifles with a barrel length of 16 inches or more and an overall length of at least 26 inches are not National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms. They are regulated as standard Title I long guns under federal law. [1, 2, 3]
 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm

Even the government does not consider them NFA weapons. 

Irrelevant to the question of design.

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:37 pm

Are they relevant?

You LIE about objective facts.

That's relevant 
 

 

Design changes that affect the lower receiver and the components are design changes and relevant.

I see you are still running from the challenge because you know you will lose.  

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:42 pm

Design changes 

Not more assertions.


"Multiple design"


You're a **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:43 pm

Not more assertions.


"Multiple design"


You're a **** idiot.

 

That is a typo, moron.  It is supposed to be multiple designs.  Now stop editing posts, asshole.
 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:47 pm

That is a typo, moron.  It is supposed to be multiple designs.  Now stop editing posts, asshole.

But that is CLEARLY not what the citation says.

Are you saying it is unreliable?
 

 

 
Error

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 11:29 am

Funny thing....I just went down this list of COlt Militray weapons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

And I can find the Colt Sporter SP1 AR 15 on the list. Or any non select fire weapon.  And there are a lot of them.

Now, when I go down this Civilian List, guess what I found?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ian_models

You guessed it!  AR-15 Sporter (SP1)!

 

Why you running?

If you post that the Sporter is on the MILITARY list, and you can post when the Sporter was standard military issue for combat I will take off until Sunday.  If you can't, STOP LECTURING US ON THIS TOPIC.

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:52 pm

Why you running?


 

Why are you lying?

Oh, yeah...

You always lie.

Never mind.

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:54 pm

Why are you lying?

Oh, yeah...

You always lie.

Never mind.

 

THere is no lie in that post.  You are running from the challenge because you know you will lose. 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 1:51 pm

But that is CLEARLY not what the citation says.

Are you saying it is unreliable?
 

 

In the article you cherry picked that citation from are two list that contain MULTIPLE models with multiple designs.  You were never man enough to scroll past the opening paragraph.