Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 6:53 am

We know all about your vision thing...

   Looks like you get the second **** off for trolling. You're in good company. You and Nefarious.
 
 

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 6:57 am

  Nope.
 You've lost.
 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants


How many families?


How many designs?

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 6:16 am

Please stop.


This isn't about taxonomy.

The German original is


Sturmgewehr.....

Loosely

"Assault rifle"

That is what the AR-15 was DESIGNED for.

And it was designed only once, though it has been broadly modified.



 

 

AI Overview



The German word Sturmgewehr (literally meaning "storm rifle" or "assault rifle") refers to a selective-fire military rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable box magazine. The term originated in World War II with the StG 44 (Sturmgewehr 44), which is widely recognized as the world's first true assault rifle.

The Sporter is not a select fire weapon so it is not an assault rifle.  

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 6:59 am

   Looks like you get the second **** off for trolling. You're in good company. You and Nefarious.

Tiny can spend eternity never "seeing" things...


 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:01 am

AI Overview

The German word Sturmgewehr (literally meaning "storm rifle" or "assault rifle") refers to a selective-fire military rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable box magazine. The term originated in World War II with the StG 44 (Sturmgewehr 44), which is widely recognized as the world's first true assault rifle.

The Sporter is not a select fire weapon so it is not an assault rifle.

Because that feature was "removed" does not make the modified result a melonballer.

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:02 am

Tiny can spend eternity never "seeing" things...


 

 

Douche, your question was answered concerning the BATF letter.  Make your point without a question.  

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:04 am

Because that feature was "removed" does not make the modified result a melonballer.

 

You mean changed in basic design (when compared to the M16) so as not to be a machine gun.

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:04 am

Douche, your question was answered concerning the BATF letter.  Make your point without a question.

What was the weapon in question?

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am

What was the weapon in question?

 

I accept your surrender due to your misunderstanding of the letter. 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am

You mean changed in basic design (

That's ATF talk...


It's not an armory definition. 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am

I accept your surrender due to your misunderstanding of the letter.

Identify the weapon, Coward.

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:06 am

That's ATF talk...


It's not an armory definition. 

 

Post this armory definition.  And tell me, when did you graduate the US Army Armorer training class?  I did in 1994.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:06 am

Identify the weapon, Coward.

 

I identified BOTH weapons.  Not to your point that you are running from. 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:05 am

I accept your surrender due to your misunderstanding of the letter.

So you are declining to confirm the details of a letter you insist is evidence of something vague.


And declaring victory.


 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:15 am

I identified BOTH weapons.  

Where?

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:01 am

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

How many families?

How many designs?

   Keep on digging.
 AR15s arent M16s.
​​​If they were then I'd own a bunch of assault rifles. As it is I only own a bunch of semi auto ARs which aren't but look like assault rifles.
  It's that simple.
 

 
 

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:18 am

   Keep on digging.
 

Listen.

This isn't about Feelings, however strongly they are held.

It is about the facts.

And we can distinguish one from the other by what confirms them.

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:18 am

   Keep on digging.
 AR15s arent M16s.
​​​If they were then I'd own a bunch of assault rifles. As it is I only own a bunch of semi auto ARs which aren't but look like assault rifles.
  It's that simple.

Do you know about this ATF letter to which Tiny is making subtle reference?

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:16 am

Where?


 

Huey
Proud PFCBlackvegetable » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
27 minutes ago
When you admit what it is...There was a disabled M 16 and a Sporter.

Now make your **** point without a question.

 viewtopic.php?p=2921642#p2921642
 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:24 am

 

An M16...


What the **** does an M16 have to do with approving a sporting rifle with a "unique design specifically developed for the civilian market"?