Liberal Forum

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:05 am

Not READILY.  Remember, words have meaning.  

But that's not at issue.

It COULD be converted because doing so only requires modification, being that the two weapons share 90% of parts...

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:07 am

But that's not at issue.

It COULD be converted because doing so only requires modification, being that the two weapons share 90% of parts...

 

Go ahead and post how a SPORTER was readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

ROG62 » 18 Aug 2026, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:03 am

which “ feature”?
 


 

He doesn't know.  
 

ROG62 » 18 Aug 2026, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 8:57 am

to which it didn’t even qualify, per the military…right?

 

What @Blackvegetable  should do is try to attack me with a semi automatic AR 15 style weapon while I have an M 16.  See how it works out for him.

OR, he could go to Next Level Firearms and have the real experts explain this to him.

https://www.nextlevelfirearms.com/
 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:12 am

He doesn't know.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 7:37 am

No....that's a theological debate....the design preceded it by nearly 2 decades...

  Now you're editing my posts.
Accept the loss and move on.
AR 15s aren't assault rifles no matter how many times you repeat that they are.

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:07 am

But that's not at issue.

It COULD be converted because doing so only requires modification, being that the two weapons share 90% of parts...

STFU asshole

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:30 am

  Now you're editing my posts.
Accept the loss and move on.
AR 15s aren't assault rifles no matter how many times you repeat that they are.

 

He has been entrenched with those views for years.  He also has issues with admitting when he is wrong.  

Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:30 am

  Now you're editing my posts.
Accept the loss and move on.
AR 15s aren't assault rifles no matter how many times you repeat that they are.

I don't trade citations for assertions.

I don't have to accept anything which ignores the direction of Time.
 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:12 am

Go ahead and post 

I don't have to post ****.

It is a fact that semi-auto AR-15 's were being converted to full auto.

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:55 am

I don't have to post ****.

It is a fact that semi-auto AR-15 's were being converted to full auto.

 

Go ahead and post how a SPORTER was readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

You keep editing out the Key word.  READILY.  Post how this is readily completed.  It is your argument.  

readily
/ˈredəlē/

Readily is an adverb that means to do something quickly, without hesitation and willingly, or to get something easily without much trouble

Why do you leave out the word READILY?

All the editing in the world will  not stop me from reposting it  

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 9:50 am

I don't trade citations for assertions.

I don't have to accept anything which ignores the direction of Time.
 

 

You have been given citations that back up our assertions.  One of them I gave you years ago and you STILL fail to understand it.  
 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:01 am

You have been given citations that back up our assertions.  

No, I haven't....

You haven't posted anything challenging the One Design Thesis.


In fact, you've run from your own "evidence"

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:00 am

Go ahead and post 

 

Why do I have to do anything of the sort?.

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:06 am

Why do I have to do anything of the sort?.

Keep running bitch boy

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:06 am

Why do I have to do anything of the sort?.

 

I accept your admission that, by definition, the ATF's own words, the SPorter WAS NOT readily converted.  If you can't back up your claim, just stop.  

Go ahead and post how a SPORTER was readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

You keep editing out the Key word.  READILY.  Post how this is readily completed.  It is your argument.  

readily
/ˈredəlē/

Readily is an adverb that means to do something quickly, without hesitation and willingly, or to get something easily without much trouble

Why do you leave out the word READILY?

All the editing in the world will  not stop me from reposting it   
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am

This is nonsense.

The "civilian" AR-15 is a variant of the original AR-15 design, modified so as not to be a machine gun subject to the 1934 regs.

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

This terminology debate is irrelevant. The AR-15's design and development predates the etymological discussion. The antecedent is German.




 

 

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

You have citations for that as well as a citation, one you have had for years, that shows the multiple designs.  Even the ATF recognizes the different designs. 

 

Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:10 am

You have citations for 

Not interested in narrative 

BV running again

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2026, 10:12 am

Not interested in narrative 

 

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

You have citations for that as well as a citation, one you have had for years, that shows the multiple designs.  Even the ATF recognizes the different designs. 

Now you are lying.  

Run, Forrest, Run.