Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ I don't have to post ****.
It is a fact that semi-auto AR-15 's were being converted to full auto.
All of which contradict your thesis...
We aren't debating "readily".Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Not interested in narrative .......![]()
![]()
How do you READILY do that?
How soon you forgot, Liar:
viewtopic.php?p=2921710#p2921710Blackvegetable
Huey » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 9:33 am
Since the exteriors of the weapons are similar
Don't be **** stupid..
A machine gun, as defined in the NFA, is "Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger." The NFA term machine gun refers to all firearms capable of full automatic fire and includes true machine guns, submachine guns, and machine pistols. The frame or receiver of a machine gun, and any combination of parts intended to make a machine gun, is legally defined as a machine gun.[8]
Nothing about "appearance"
I need more than narrative from you.Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ All of which contradict your thesis...
Post a credible citation describing the independent design and development of the semi-auto...
Scroll up, Princess
So?Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Nah. You mentioned "readily" first. I reposted your words. I am eagerly awaiting you narrative, supported by citations and links, that shows a Sporter can be converted quickly, without hesitation and willingly, and easily without much trouble.
Run, Forrest, Run.
Squatchman » 18 Aug 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ Now you're editing my posts.
Accept the loss and move on.
AR 15s aren't assault rifles no matter how many times you repeat that they are.
Divert? I posted your **** words. Are you really this dense or do you do it on purpose?
viewtopic.php?p=2921710#p2921710Blackvegetable
Huey » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 9:33 am
Since the exteriors of the weapons are similar
Don't be **** stupid..
A machine gun, as defined in the NFA, is "Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger." The NFA term machine gun refers to all firearms capable of full automatic fire and includes true machine guns, submachine guns, and machine pistols. The frame or receiver of a machine gun, and any combination of parts intended to make a machine gun, is legally defined as a machine gun.[8]
Nothing about "appearance"

"Readily" is the word used in the 1934 legislationHuey » 18 Aug 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Nah. You mentioned "readily" first. I reposted your words. I am eagerly awaiting you narrative, supported by citations and links, that shows a Sporter can be converted quickly, without hesitation and willingly, and easily without much trouble.
Run, Forrest, Run.
And you said we all know they can be converted. But they can't be converted READILY. Then you run.
I didn't say that.Huey » 18 Aug 2026, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ And you said we all know they can be converted. But they can't be converted READILY. Then you run.
It is not a question of if a sporter could have been converted. It is a question if it could be readily converted.Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't say that.
More wasted bandwidth because you lie.
digest.php?u=1971&t=103339&start=80Blackvegetable
Huey » Today, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:05 am
Not READILY. Remember, words have meaning. But that's not at issue.
It COULD be converted because doing so only requires modification, being that the two weapons share 90% of parts...
So you liedHuey » 18 Aug 2026, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not a question of if a sporter could have been converted. It is a question if it could be readily converted.
digest.php?u=1971&t=103339&start=80
No diversion.

You got it completely wrong....
Mary, go to that shop in your town that I gave you the link for. Have the real experts explain it to you. If need be let me know and I will call ahead so they can break it down into small words you can easily understand:Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You got it completely wrong....
yet somehow you still "win"
You're a **** idiot