Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:11 am

Quiet, Coward!

**** YOU 

BITCH BOY

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:06 am

Who doesn't admire the panache with which you cherrypick selections from citations which consistently and unambiguously reject your central thesis?

 

I didn't cherry pick anything. Those are facts. 

Still waiting on your case.  

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:27 am

I didn't cherry pick anything. Those are facts. 

Still waiting on your case.

That clearly depends on the day.

Still waiting on your case.

I opened with my argument, and provided evidence in its support.

That pretty much DEFINES "case".

Which is why you don't even try.

BV running once again

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 7:03 am

This is nonsense.

The "civilian" AR-15 is a variant of the original AR-15 design, modified so as not to be a machine gun subject to the 1934 regs.

It doesn't "look" like an assault rifle...it is one.

This terminology debate is irrelevant. The AR-15's design and development predates the etymological discussion. The antecedent is German.




 

 

Please provide the definition of an assault WEAPON.

The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[17] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire rifles such as the FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:41 am

Please provide 

Now that we all know you lied, it is time for you to provide...

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am

Now that we all know you lied, it is time for you to provide...

KEEP RUNNING BITCH BOY

FJB » 17 Aug 2026, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:46 am

KEEP RUNNING BITCH BOY

You have a question to answer.

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:47 am

You have a question to answer.

ANSWERED ALREADY
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am

Now that we all know you lied, it is time for you to provide...

 

 

You will have to provide this specific lie as you attempt to take control of the thread.

I have twice posted the definition of an assault rifle.  Squatch posted it as well.  Go ahead and post the definition of an assault weapon.  


 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:51 am

You will have to provide this specific lie as you attempt to take control of the thread.

I have twice posted the definition of an assault rifle.  Squatch posted it as well.  Go ahead and post the definition of an assault weapon.

Do you even understand the argument?

There was no debate over what the AR-15 was when designed.


 

FJB » 17 Aug 2026, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:48 am

ANSWERED ALREADY

No...you have not...

Because you are a coward...
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:21 am

Do you even understand the argument?

There was no debate over what the AR-15 was when designed.

The Armalite Rifle 15 Assault Rifle or the AR 15 Colt Sporter semiautomatic? 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:21 am

No...you have not...

Because you are a coward...

not my problem you are a bitch boy liberal shill

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:23 am

The Armalite Rifle 15 Assault Rifle or the AR 15 Colt Sporter semiautomatic?

The AR-15 was designed ONCE....

As all your citations make perfectly clear.
 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 8:22 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 8:21 am

Read the post to which you just responded.


 

I'm good.  Waiting on you to make an argument.  Carry on.

 

 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:51 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:44 am

Now that we all know you lied, it is time for you to provide...

 


 

You will have to provide this specific lie as you attempt to take control of the thread.



 

 

How many times, Tiny?

BV the bitch boy liberal shill
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:36 am

The AR-15 was designed ONCE....

As all your citations make perfectly clear.
 

 

Incorrect.  In the 50s Armalite, a division of Fairchild Aircraft, was in competition to design the new combat rifle for the military.  They came up with the AR 10/15.  An automatic rifle.  In 1959, Colt than bought the rights to both, and designated its model number c601, calling it officially the ArmaLite AR-15.  You have the link to that because you often post the the beginning of that article, although you don't understand and don't read beyond the first para. Between them and the Government the name was change to M 16 and the NAME AR 15 was shelved.  A few years later a civilian model was DESIGNED.  I have posted the design changes for you often, and have done so today.  They named it the AR 15 Sporter SP1.  


 

Huey » 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:47 am

Incorrect.  

Literally every single one of your citations.

As repeatedly demonstrated 

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:41 am

 


How many times, Tiny?

 

I accept your surrender on the lie accusation.

The reason you can't post the definition of an Assault Weapon is because lie and Assault RIFLE, there is no STANDARD definition.  It is a political/legal term based on external cosmetic features.  The definition depends on what jurisdiction you are using.  

It really was a trick question