Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:40 am

You've NEVER answered that question,  Reflexive Coward.




 

Prove it.  
 
 
 

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:50 am

Prove it.

:rofl:  

digest.php?u=955

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:49 am

NOt for combat, ****.  

Irrelevant..

It had to EXIST.

Meaning it had already been DESIGNED.


**** idiot 

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:53 am

 

digest.php?u=955

 

LOL!

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:55 am

Irrelevant..

It had to EXIST.

Meaning it had already been DESIGNED.


**** idiot 

 

I never said it didn't exist.  Keep lying, el Douche.  

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:59 am

I never said it didn't exist.  Keep lying, el Douche.

And I haven't said you did, lying little twat..

The point being that it was DESIGNED in the 50s, BEFORE the nomenclature debate of the 60s.


Imbecile.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 10:32 am

And I haven't said you did, lying little twat..

The point being that it was DESIGNED in the 50s, BEFORE the nomenclature debate of the 60s.


Imbecile.

 

That's nice.  The Sporter was never the c601.  You would know what it was if you took the time to actually read the article you cite and don't understand.

Just sayin'
 

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 10:36 am

That's nice.  The Sporter was never the c601.  

And you can demonstrate this?

I doubt it. .

We KNOW the Sporter is a modified version of the original Colt AR-15...

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 10:52 am

And you can demonstrate this?

I doubt it. .

We KNOW the Sporter is a modified version of the original Colt AR-15...

 

Already done.  You have he source.  You have the lists.  I have given all of that to you.  You can also find the line in the thread were you had your epic loss the other day. Or you can click on the link in my sig box and go to the civilian list.  

I have give you the tools over and over and over and over and over again.  I can't make you read it.

 

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 10:54 am

Already done.  You have he source.  

Man up, ffs.

You have ZERO factual basis for that assertion 

BV playing his childish games again

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 10:55 am

Man up, ffs.

You have ZERO factual basis for that assertion 

 

Already done.  You have he source.  You have the lists.  I have given all of that to you.  You can also find the line in the thread were you had your epic loss the other day. Or you can click on the link in my sig box and go to the civilian list.  

I have give you the tools over and over and over and over and over again.  I can't make you read it.

I have been giving that source for years.  **** off.

FJB » 20 Aug 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 11:03 am

BV playing his childish games again


 

He usually gets really bad with them after a devasting *** whoopin'