Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 7:26 am

It's not about me..

It's about the facts, and your habit of lying.
 

 

Of course it is not about you, narcissist.  The fact is you have not seen the reflecting pool in decades.  I have seen it often. He couldn't have made it worse.

Acknowledge I have criticized him for the **** up job, el Douche.  You will start **** even when I agree with you, wimp.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 6:47 am

But neither of you has any idea what your "supporting evidence" is. 

There is no hill...

Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”

E. Jean Carroll Receives $5.6 Million Payment From Trump in Civil CaseA federal jury found President Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Ms. Carroll. He exhausted his appeals last month, prompting a judge to order that the money be paid.

no one gives a flying **** about the judge’s post verdict OPINION . It was decided be a jury of his peers according to NY statute by the prosecutor’s failure of proving it…

you’re the master absolutist of stupidity, clinger…

F-U-C-K-O-F-F
 

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 6:44 am

He generally dies on hills on topics he knows little about.

it’s what happens when he brings a straw and spitballs to a gunfight…
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 6:34 am

What is that document you are flashing, JuCo?

Do you have any idea?

 What a brainless asshole...

So now the semi auto came first?

Your only way out is self inflicted euthanasia.

that what you posted, D-U-M-B-F-U-C-K
 

ROG62 » 20 Aug 2026, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 7:59 am

it’s what happens when he brings a straw and spitballs to a gunfight…
 

 

 

Yeah, a semi automatic toa fight with M 16s, AKs, and M4s.  


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

19 Aug 2026, 11:38 am

I've already told you.

Apparently you're too stupid to understand it.....

run, **** ******, RUN!

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 6:34 am

What is that document you are flashing, JuCo?


Do you have any idea?

 What a brainless asshole...

So now the semi auto came first?

Your only way out is self inflicted euthanasia. 

 

Actually, the semi auto Sporter was available before the M 16 was standard issue in the Army and Marine Corp.  That has been posted to you numerous times.  You didn't read before deleting.  
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Aug 2026, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Aug 2026, 11:36 am

What is the document @ROG62  repeatedly posts, but won't identify?

A screenshot of a screenshot that you originally posted which looks to be the TOC of a court archive that indicates a verdict of no rape by defendant, possibly DJT…

anything else?
 

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:07 am

Actually, the semi auto Sporter was available before the M 16 was standard issue in the Army and Marine Corp.  That has been posted to you numerous times.  You didn't read before deleting.

Entirely irrelevant...

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:35 am

Entirely irrelevant...

 

It is when you make uninformed and ignorant comments.  

ROG62 » 20 Aug 2026, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:13 am

A screenshot of a screenshot that you originally posted which looks to be the TOC of a court archive that indicates a verdict of no rape by defendant, possibly DJT…

anything else?

Huey avatar Huey +5 17 minutes ago


You're a pair of ineducable cretins.

It is the index from the Petition of Team Grifty seeking relief from the jury's assessment. 

What is circled is a CLAIM, not a fact.

"B...B...B...but verdict form!!!!!.....(....sob...)"

How can we be 100% certain that the finding is entirely irrelevant?

Ask yourself what the consequence would have been of a FINDING of Guilty.

The answer - because you know @ROG62  and @Huey  will run like sniveling bitches from their own questions - is "NOT A **** THING"

Now can one of you dimwits tell me at what level of appeal Team Grifty's argument PREVAILED?


:rofl:  


Sweep that crap outta here.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:54 am

Huey avatar Huey +5 17 minutes ago


You're a pair of ineducable cretins.

It is the index from the Petition of Team Grifty seeking relief from the jury's assessment. 

What is circled is a CLAIM, not a fact.

"B...B...B...but verdict form!!!!!.....(....sob...)"

How can we be 100% certain that the finding is entirely irrelevant?

Ask yourself what the consequence would have been of a FINDING of Guilty.

The answer - because you know @ROG62  and @Huey  will run like sniveling bitches from their own questions - is "NOT A **** THING"

Now can one of you dimwits tell me at what level of appeal Team Grifty's argument PREVAILED?


 


Sweep that crap outta here.

 

Stay ignorant.  It is quote amusing.  I love how you get your panties in a was over greenies and reddies.  

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:55 am

Stay ignorant.  It is quote amusing.  I love how you get your panties in a was over greenies and reddies.

Try addressing the facts.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:14 am

Try addressing the facts.

I’ve addressed them over and over over the years.

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:15 am

I’ve addressed them over and over over the years.

So, what's your answer....


So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:30 am

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:15 am

I’ve addressed them over and over over the years.

So, what's your answer....


So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

 

Sae as it was the last time you demanded an answer.  I am done with this argument.  

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 8:41 am

It is when you make uninformed and ignorant comments.

You literally don't know a **** thing 


First Buyer: General Curtis LeMay ordered Colt-manufactured AR-15 (Model 01/Colt 601) rifles for Air Force base security in 1962, ahead of the U.S. Army's wider adoption of the modified M16.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:38 am

You literally don't know a **** thing 

First Buyer: General Curtis LeMay ordered Colt-manufactured AR-15 (Model 01/Colt 601) rifles for Air Force base security in 1962, ahead of the U.S. Army's wider adoption of the modified M16.

More copy/paste. never any thoughts of your own. Ever.

Huey » 20 Aug 2026, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:35 am

Sae as it was the last time you demanded an answer.  I am done with this argument.

You've NEVER answered that question,  Reflexive Coward.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2026, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2026, 9:38 am

You literally don't know a **** thing 


First Buyer: General Curtis LeMay ordered Colt-manufactured AR-15 (Model 01/Colt 601) rifles for Air Force base security in 1962, ahead of the U.S. Army's wider adoption of the modified M16.

 

NOt for combat, ****.  YOU don't know a **** thing.  Colt 601, if you bothered to read the citation you often cite, is Colt's redesigned Armalite Rifle 15, not the Sporter and was different from the 1965 Combat Issue M 16.  Just go to the source of your citation and scroll down.  You will see the lists you refuse to read.