Liberal Forum

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 

Hundreds of emails exchanged between U.S. immigration officials, which were obtained by the National Iranian American Council and made public on Tuesday, offer the most transparent play by play yet of how the two countries worked together to arrange for more than 100 Iranians to be flown back to Iran on three separate immigration flights in September and December 2025 and January 2026. The emails were first reported by The Intercept. 

The emails show that Iranian officials had some influence over which Iranian immigrants in the U.S. were sent back to their home country, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials apparently heeded some last-minute changes to deportation lists at the request of Iran.

 https://share.google/nqSyRY3SImz1GHS38

How accommodating. 

**** scumbags
 

-

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 am

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 


**** scumbags

#Iranianhatingrayciss
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:04 am

#Iranianhatingrayciss

Turn over your jews...


Seriously, Rog...consider suicide...it would be a fabulous look on you.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:06 am

Turn over your jews...

Seriously, Rog...consider suicide...it would be a fabulous look on you.

what’s with the Jew talk?

regarding ”seriously”? F-U-C-K-O-F-F

go chew on some pepper spray…and take the tire licker with you…

ROG62 » Yesterday, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:03 am

what’s with the Jew talk?

regarding ”seriously”? F-U-C-K-O-F-F

go chew on some pepper spray…and take the tire licker with you…

it's figurative, you cretinous lump of ****.
 

ToddsterPatriot » Yesterday, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:00 am

-

So, Toddster..

Whom do you think the mullahs would want ICE to deliver, free of charge?



 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 am

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 

Hundreds of emails exchanged between U.S. immigration officials, which were obtained by the National Iranian American Council and made public on Tuesday, offer the most transparent play by play yet of how the two countries worked together to arrange for more than 100 Iranians to be flown back to Iran on three separate immigration flights in September and December 2025 and January 2026. The emails were first reported by The Intercept. 

The emails show that Iranian officials had some influence over which Iranian immigrants in the U.S. were sent back to their home country, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials apparently heeded some last-minute changes to deportation lists at the request of Iran.

 https://share.google/nqSyRY3SImz1GHS38

How accommodating. 

**** scumbags

Hey LGBTP Delusions of Grandeur Dickhead

who cares?....you have no credibility and neither do the fake news sources you use

nefarious101 » Yesterday, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:21 am

Hey LGBTP 

ClitFace,


First they came for the MAGAts....

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:35 am

ClitFace,

First they came for the MAGAts....

MAGA's are coming for you Dickhead...

you're revolution of *** and islamocrats fizzled 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:17 am

it's figurative, you cretinous lump of ****.

look in the mirror and come to the realization you’re **** lucky you don’t get pepper sprayed more often…

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 am

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 

Hundreds of emails exchanged between U.S. immigration officials, which were obtained by the National Iranian American Council and made public on Tuesday, offer the most transparent play by play yet of how the two countries worked together to arrange for more than 100 Iranians to be flown back to Iran on three separate immigration flights in September and December 2025 and January 2026. The emails were first reported by The Intercept. 

The emails show that Iranian officials had some influence over which Iranian immigrants in the U.S. were sent back to their home country, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials apparently heeded some last-minute changes to deportation lists at the request of Iran.

 https://share.google/nqSyRY3SImz1GHS38

How accommodating. 

**** scumbags

You are owed your last spam. Don't worry, you will earn more. You can't help it. Enjoy.

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.


 
 

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.





Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
 

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time.
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.





Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.

I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time.
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
 
 
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:52 am

look in the mirror and come to the realization you’re **** lucky you don’t get pepper sprayed more often…

Word gets around, JuCo...

The spray only draws my unwanted attention.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 am

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 

Hundreds of emails exchanged between U.S. immigration officials, which were obtained by the National Iranian American Council and made public on Tuesday, offer the most transparent play by play yet of how the two countries worked together to arrange for more than 100 Iranians to be flown back to Iran on three separate immigration flights in September and December 2025 and January 2026. The emails were first reported by The Intercept. 

The emails show that Iranian officials had some influence over which Iranian immigrants in the U.S. were sent back to their home country, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials apparently heeded some last-minute changes to deportation lists at the request of Iran.

 https://share.google/nqSyRY3SImz1GHS38

How accommodating. 

**** scumbags

Once you get racked there's no going back.  Am I supposed to get my backpack ready too?

"Benito rack" usually refers to outdoor bike and scooter storage systems made by Benito Urban,
 
One of mom's actors in her childrens theatre was Iranian..  Blond Hair Blue Eyes..  Jet Set Rich...

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:11 pm

Once you get racked there's no going back.  Am I supposed to get my backpack ready too?

"Benito rack" usually refers to outdoor bike and scooter storage systems made by Benito Urban,
 
One of mom's actors in her childrens theatre was Iranian..  Blond Hair Blue Eyes..  Jet Set Rich...

See "Benito Mussolini, denouement"

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:16 pm

See "Benito Mussolini, denouement"

Ahhh....

Man, I wonder what the young kid would do in Walmart if I asked "Do you have any Mussolini?"

Who would name their bicycle rack after a dictator?   Headed East of Easton today.  I did learn how to share pics via mobil recently.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 am

LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration officials worked with Iran to deport Iranians in 2025, newly released emails show, revealing a working relationship between the U.S. and Iranian governments despite tensions mounting between the countries. 

Hundreds of emails exchanged between U.S. immigration officials, which were obtained by the National Iranian American Council and made public on Tuesday, offer the most transparent play by play yet of how the two countries worked together to arrange for more than 100 Iranians to be flown back to Iran on three separate immigration flights in September and December 2025 and January 2026. The emails were first reported by The Intercept. 

The emails show that Iranian officials had some influence over which Iranian immigrants in the U.S. were sent back to their home country, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials apparently heeded some last-minute changes to deportation lists at the request of Iran.

 https://share.google/nqSyRY3SImz1GHS38

How accommodating. 

**** scumbags

You'd have to be **** insane to roll down the welcome mat for Muslims into your own country.