Liberal Forum

Squatchman » Today, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:57 am

  And the Republicans platform is hate democrats because they're Communists.
  Trump got himself into the Iran mess let him dig himself and the Republicans out.
 He's the best advertisement for election the democrats could ask for. We don't need to lift a finger or spend millions in ads.

Well, first of all, your ******* **** don't have millions to spend on ANY campaign, and no one is DONATING TO THEM either!!       

Second, SOLUTIONS win elections, not "I hate Trump", ******!!! You nor your party have those.

And I HATE WHAT **** HAVE DONE by allowing the takeover of your PARTY OF MORONS by COMMUNISTS!! And if you think that is a GOOD THING, then you are THE biggest **** IDIOTS that ever sucked air!! You and all your nasty pieces of moron **** think it is, so there's that!!

Trust me, the CIVIL WAR is coming, and you'll find yourself in the bad end of what follows that!! Hell, you COMMIES have already said it's going to take VIOLENCE to achieve their ends!! So bring it on, ****!! 

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

No ****** that is not a lie.

And no, I wasn't answered.  You did not post the policies she supports.  That was part of the deal.  You are a liar, not a man of your.  But, on the bright side I never have to answer that question again.

You know how to use search...when you think it suits you. 

And no, I wasn't answered.  You did not post the policies she supports

:rofl:  

Instant Recall,

It is the same answer you gave me when I asked why you were casting a 2nd proud vote for Worse than Buchanan.

And you refused to elaborate.

Do so now and I will reciprocate.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

You know how to use search...when you think it suits you. 

 

Instant Recall,

It is the same answer you gave me when I asked why you were casting a 2nd proud vote for Worse than Buchanan.

And you refused to elaborate.

Do so now and I will reciprocate.

We are not playing this same answer ****.  Plus the search feature is gone, asshole.  The deal was I would answer that question for the last **** time and you would name a name and the policies.  When it suits you, you  play the same question **** .

You are not a man of your **** word.  

Beekeeper » Today, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:13 am

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

 

   

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:07 am

Let's see who's the ******..

I'll tell you whom I would like to see nominated by the Democrats...

If you will tell everyone why you didn't cast a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty..

Proceed to ******.

the same, ultra boring ****…play stupid games, post vague stupid ****, ask stupid questions, make demands, rinse, repeat…also known as pantydancing, sidestepping, tying sprint shoes, etc…your vacuous tedium knows no bounds, Mincing Twat…

Blackvegetable » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

This is a lie..

"You idiots...your politicians"?

That's not very verbatim either..

I recall you saying "Democrats" opposing his Vision Thing...

How's that working out for you?

For us?

You're a **** idiot.

Amy Klobuchar

For seasons reasons..

Acknowledge that you've been answered.

Queen fluff?   

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:59 am

WOW!!

And to think, you actually BELEVE that COMMUNISM is the SOLUTION!!!

DENOUNCE IT IF YOU DON'T!!

Chase me, ****!!

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

You know how to use search...when you think it suits you. 

 

Instant Recall,

It is the same answer you gave me when I asked why you were casting a 2nd proud vote for Worse than Buchanan.

And you refused to elaborate.

Do so now and I will reciprocate.

the same, ultra boring ****…play stupid games, post vague stupid ****, ask stupid questions, make demands, rinse, repeat…also known as pantydancing, sidestepping, tying sprint shoes, etc…your vacuous tedium knows no bounds, Mincing Twat…

ROG62 » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

the same, 

Then bugger off.


Simple.

Beekeeper » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

WOW!!

And to think, you actually BELEVE that COMMUNISM is the SOLUTION!!!

DENOUNCE IT IF YOU DON'T!!

Chase me, ****!!

:rofl:  

 

ROG62 » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Queen fluff? 

JuCo,


She went to Yale..

On her merits.

There isn't a MAGAt alive who would debate her.

Not one.

 

Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

We are not playing this same answer ****.  

Why not?

Seems a perfect chance to resolve this chronic issue of yours, ******...

Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

We are not playing this same answer ****.  Plus the search feature is gone, asshole.  The deal was I would answer that question for the last **** time and you would name a name and the policies.  

https://archive.liberalforum.net/search ... to=&page=3


Should get you there, liar..

You ALWAYS demand much more than you're willing to provide.

We both know your idiotic exercise is only meant to divert from issues resulting from policies for which you have cravenly toadied..

 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

We are not playing this same answer ****.  Plus the search feature is gone, asshole.  The deal was I would answer that question for the last **** time and you would name a name and the policies.  

https://archive.liberalforum.net/search ... amp;page=3


Should get you there, liar..

You ALWAYS demand much more than you're willing to provide.

We both know your idiotic exercise is only meant to divert from issues resulting from policies for which you have cravenly toadied..

 

 

I wasn't lying, ******.  I could no longer pull it up and the admin thread with the link was gone.

Now, YOU lied.  You did not answer the question.  No more deals with a prick like you.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

We are not playing this same answer ****.  Plus the search feature is gone, asshole.  The deal was I would answer that question for the last **** time and you would name a name and the policies.  When it suits you, you  play the same question **** .

You are not a man of your **** word
 

Why not?

Seems a perfect chance to resolve this chronic issue of yours, ******...

 

What issues and policy of Amy Klobachar made pick her?  
 

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

What issues and policy of Amy Klobachar made pick her?

She has not announced a candidacy, nor has she offered a current platform.

At this point, it's little more than hers being the highest IQ in the field.

That is a topic which you lack the essentials to debate.

Acknowledge that you've been answered...again.
 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

I wasn't lying, ******.  I could no longer pull it up and the admin thread with the link was gone.

Now, YOU lied.  You did not answer the question.  No more deals with a prick like you.

You lied about your reasons, the archives and whether or not I answered the question. 

Pretty much everything. 

SS, DD
 

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Now, YOU lied.  You did not answer the question.  

I  clearly DID answer it, Liar.

No more deals with a prick like you.

:rofl:  

Lying little ******..
 

BV is a proven pathological liar
 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

I  clearly DID answer it, Liar.

 

Lying little ******..

No, ya lying prick, you answered half.  You did not name policies and issues that you support.   It s because you don't know them.  No more deals with a scumbag like you.