I’m curious how that’s gonna happenConservativeWave » Today, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ SO... WHAT does THAT MEAN?
1) The Postal service will NOT send mail in ballots to ANYONE who who is NOT a U,S. Citizen,
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The Postmaster General has already talked about it... They (i.e. the Feds) want the electronic voter rolls of all 50 states, and they will electronically check that each person provided as part of the voter roll, is a U.S, citizen... and IF NOT, the Postal Service is PART of the Federal Government (NOT the states), and they will NOT send "Mail in ballots" to ANYONE who is NOT a U.S. citizen !!
Facism R Us..
8 states use mail in ballots for all votes....Squatchman » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
Those are all blue states already Looks like the republican hopefuls there are out of luck doesn't it? Those candidates are the ones that are really getting ****.
How is SCOTUS reversed? I hope you are right.Squatchman » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Those are all blue states already Looks like the republican hopefuls there are out of luck doesn't it? Those candidates are the ones that are really getting ****.
Republicans in the other states that have to use mail in ballots are also ****,not just people that vote Democrat.
This ruling will probably be reversed anyway before the midterms. SCOTUS left that door open and the suits are on their way.
This is only a pause to give time for proper litigation to be filed. They can rescind this ruling once it's done properly. And it's already been sent in.JohnnyYou » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How is SCOTUS reversed? I hope you are right.
Now we need a new postal investigative unit? Last time I shipped something the cost was prohibitive..
My town provides a drop off box. Problem solved.. That is if my mail in ballot gets here..
The election is 6 weeks away. I should recieve my ballot soon...
you’re an idiot…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're a **** idiot, no one wants to restrict voting rights, we want to restrict voting fraud.Squatchman » Today, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
They want, but most won’t turn them over…ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑ The Postmaster General has already talked about it... They (i.e. the Feds) want the electronic voter rolls of all 50 states, and they will electronically check that each person provided as part of the voter roll, is a U.S, citizen... and IF NOT, the Postal Service is PART of the Federal Government (NOT the states), and they will NOT send "Mail in ballots" to ANYONE who is NOT a U.S. citizen !!
Sounds pretty simple to me... especially in the "Age of AI "!!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Nor will they. States run elections not the federal government. Also democrats aren't the only people that avail themselves of mail in voting.
HA!! The BOTTOM LINE ?... for the IDIOT, CORRUPT, Marxist/Socialist/Communist Democrats to be fighting SO HARD to prevent something that 85% of the American PEOPLE believe is COMMON SENSE? ...WHILE, it's NO LONGER in question that the Marxist/Socialist/Communist's ACTUALLY ARE TRYING to TAKE OVER the Democrat Party?Squatchman » Today, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
it becomes a federal issue since states are using the USPS…Squatchman » Today, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑ Nor will they. States run elections not the federal government. Also democrats aren't the only people that avail themselves of mail in voting.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom How it would supposedly work:
FUNNY... Because THAT was pretty much what the SCOTUS ruled about yesterday... as I understand it... 23 states sued the Trump Administration saying Trump DID NOT have standing to impose the new voting restrictions on the States thru "Executive Orders" (XO's)... BUT, the SCOTUS's decision yesterday essentially SAID that the STATES DID NOT have "standing" to QUESTION the Presidents authority regarding his decision, based on his use of XO's to CONTROL the "States" ABUSE of voting laws... and that's where it stands !!Squatchman » Today, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑ Nor will they. States run elections not the federal government. Also democrats aren't the only people that avail themselves of mail in voting.
And that's what makes it unconstitutional.