Never has never will.ConservativeWave » 25 Aug 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Trump DID NOT have standing to impose the new voting restrictions on the States thru "Executive Orders" (XO's).
NO... Asking the states to COMPLY with Federal LAWS (i.e. YOU MUST be an American citizen to vote in federal elections) is NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL you MORON !!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ And that's what makes it unconstitutional.
The USPS is an arm of the federal government.
The constitution says that states can run elections as they see fit.
Connie been conned againSquatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
NO!! ...THAT'S HORSE $HIT !!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Never has never will.
He just wants to restrict voting because he's desperate.
HA!! I'M being conned???
So democrats win by 12 points instead of 16..ConservativeWave » 25 Aug 2026, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ HA!! I'M being conned???
IF SO... Then WHY was the SCOTUS decision MUCH MORE a "TRUMP VICTORY"... than it was a "STATES RIGHTS VICTORY" ??? Even though the SCOTUS did NOT seem to want to give the chief executive "CARTE BLANCHE" with the use of XO's? THEY ALSO DID NOT want to give the power to the STATES EITHER !!
They COULD have just given the STATES the POWER... AND CALLED IT A DAY... BUT, THEY DID NOT ! ... BUT, THEY DID let the TRUMPS XO stand... for now... and THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES !!
restricting illegals?Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Never has never will.
He just wants to restrict voting because he's desperate.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ^^^ 0-fer batting 1.000
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Po Po johnny…JohnnyYou » 25 Aug 2026, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So democrats win by 12 points instead of 16..
Margins ain't in MAGA's favor.
Trump wants a MAGA convention.. No RSVPs..
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom HA!!JohnnyYou » 25 Aug 2026, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So democrats win by 12 points instead of 16..
Margins ain't in MAGA's favor.
Trump wants a MAGA convention.. No RSVPs..
You might want to prepare yourself.
the states are still running it…DERP!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ And that's what makes it unconstitutional.
The USPS is an arm of the federal government.
The constitution says that states can run elections as they see fit.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The USPS said it would not deliver ballots to any state not in compliance with these changes...Fuelman » 25 Aug 2026, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ How it would supposedly work:
https://abc7ny.com/post/usps-makes-new- ... LT3SUrXmaw
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom A federal judge lifted the final injunction blocking President Trump's mail-in voting executive order on August 26, 2026.Squatchman » 24 Aug 2026, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ The executive order is still blocked in a nationwide injunction in a different court filed by The League of Women Voters.
Why do you keep saying "voter restriction"?Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
Well, you ARE correct in that it's NOT VOTER RESTRICTION in any manner!!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 3:05 am » wrote: ↑ And this ruling says that the 23 states brought their suit prematurely because the USPS hadn't made their final rule. Since then the USPS has n made their rule final and the EP can be challenged again for the final ruling by the SC.
What the SC is saying is yesterday's ruling is just a pause.
Don't break pit the champagne yet you stupid ****. This isn't the voter restriction you believe it to be.
RebelGator » 28 Aug 2026, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you keep saying "voter restriction"?
Do you want the dumb *** label that BV and 'Shamboner proudly wear?
There is no restriction, you mullet headed jackass.
HA!! I might give YOU the same advice !!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You might want to prepare yourself.
Get the industrial strength butthurt creme in the 5 gallon bucket. You're going to need it.
TRUMP is the POTUS, and has EXECUTIVE POWER... and SO, HE DOES HAVE the RIGHT to issue XO's ! HOWEVER, CONGRESS has the RESPONSIBILITY to CLARIFY/CORRECT such potential STATE CORRUPTION thru the passage of LAWS!Squatchman » 25 Aug 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Never has never will.
He just wants to restrict voting because he's desperate.