There, FIFY!!

Apparently not..
https://i.postimg.cc/gjLWXGQP/HEt-Kq-L1 ... -small.jpgBlackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Apparently not..
The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.
It's an impartial analysis of a sample of my writing.Beekeeper » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ https://i.postimg.cc/gjLWXGQP/HEt-Kq-L1 ... -small.jpg
YOU starting THIS **** again???
ONLY a **** MORON would try, ****!!
Not unless you can define "subtext"YOU starting THIS **** again???
****
By God they'd better not muck about renaming the Gulf of America!Squatchman » Yesterday, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ There's going to be a lot of that after he's gone in 2028. He has to know. I don't know why he even bothers with this vanity ****.
I once was dumbfounded that you insisted this ^ is donald trump - against the evidence of pictures of Trump at that time looking very much as he does today, only younger.
Blackvegetable » Today, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ It's an impartial analysis of a sample of my writing.
Not unless you can define "subtext"
I met the granddaughter of the guy who ran CPUSA..
Her father and two uncles were Deans of the Departments of Mathematics at
Brown
Princeton
and
U of Chicago.
No....but that Commie must have been something special.
Cannonpointer » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I once was dumbfounded that you insisted this ^ is donald trump - against the evidence of pictures of Trump at that time looking very much as he does today, only younger.
Then I remembered you think this is a chick:
I'm not Beefondler, child.against the evidence of pictures of Trump at that time
No. You're the idiot who insists a mexican midget is trump and a guy is a girl.
How do "pictures" "prove" it's not Roy's catamite, Sweet Donnie...Cannonpointer » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No. You're the idiot who insists a mexican midget is trump and a guy is a girl.
If you claimed a photo of Gary Coleman were a photo of Wilt Chamberlain, can you understand how your own proffer would PROVE you incorrect?Blackvegetable » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How do "pictures" "prove" it's not Roy's catamite, Sweet Donnie...
How do you know that the photos are of Coleman and Chamberlain?Cannonpointer » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If you claimed a photo of Gary Coleman were a photo of Wilt Chamberlain, can you understand how your own proffer would PROVE you incorrect?
This is like that - only more so, you dummy.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/d8cw349Xzcs/maxresdefault.jpg
Your mom assured me as I was decocking from her butt.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How do you know that the photos are of Coleman and Chamberlain?
Yoi mean like that phony photo of Trump in drag from VF? Debunked. It's not him. You and VF lied.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How do you know that the photos are of Coleman and Chamberlain?
I guess we exhausted this one.
Answer the question, Coward..
Your OP, your job to answer questions. You don't do that.