As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.ConservativeWave » 28 Aug 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ 1) OPENED the borders and let MILLIONS of illegal aliens into the country, and TRIED to make American believe it wasn't TRUE !
2) RAMPED UP voter registrations of Illegals !
3) Turned "election day" voting & winner declarations, into "MONTH LONG ORDEALS" & made it IMPOSSIBLE to believe they are HONEST !
4) Went PRIMARILY to "Mail In Ballots"... that even Jimmy Carter said were an "OPEN invitations to VOTER FRAUD" !
5) Been FRANTIC that the "Save America Act" be DEFEATED, even though has 85% APPROVAL of ALL American voters... INCLUDING Democrats !
6) Have been PUSHING the idea that there "IS NO VOTER FRAUD in America"... Until actual audits of ballots... that they TRIED SO DESPERATELY to STOP... ACTUALLY exposed the TRUTH !
7) Millions of illegals (i.e. RELIABLE Democrat Votes) have now been DEPORTED... and MORE are leaving EVERY DAY !! and..
8) The Democrat Party is now RELYING on SOCIALISTS & COMMUNISTS to elect Democrats... BUT, EVEN MOST "DEMOCRATS" DON'T WANT "Communists" in power, IN AMERICA !!
When Donald Trump is finished with his Mid-Term anti SOCIALISTS, COMMUNISTS & DEMOCRAT... ELECTION PUSH (THIS FALL)... and uses ONLY the TRUTH & FACTS to make his POINTS... i.e. that the CORE of the Democrat Party TODAY is MORE Communist than than they are Democrat... THAT they (DEMOCRATS) are ELECTING COMMUNISTS ALL ACROSS America, AND THAT TODAY'S Democrat Party has NO RESEMBLANCE AT ALL to the Hubert Humphrey Democrat Party of 1968 !
I think ENOUGH Democrats will WAKE UP (and SEE THE LIGHT)... and turn the Mid Term election into a Pro America/American & Republican ROUT... FOR AMERICA !!
But your "comparison" is illogical.DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.
1.) Conservatives used to oppose (vehemently) abortion. It was found over a fairly short timeframe that even conservatives found it to be a necessary procedure. So we are now at a stage where this acquiescence to a need outweighed a wish. A nod to human nature (mistakes, hormones, etc.) basically.
2.) Liberals have allowed wishes to overtake even their common sense (dubious as that is much of the time). The extreme and largely rejected notions of a few have yet to come full circle. See #1. It is hoped the next few months will be the slap to finally bring the hysterics to a close.
Conservatives can compromise even on something as deeply important as killing babies.
Can liberals manage the spine to compromise (or fully reject tantrum-fueled progressives)?
-------------
I see libs reject friends and family far more than any conservatives. That isn't "firm principles" in action.
That's usurped principles when you are basically talked into rejecting people in your life...
like having no principles at all.
Well said…politics is a game…unless one part is in complete control…it’s a game of compromises. If that doesn’t happen, you end up with the **** we’ve seen for the couple of decades…adequately coined as “the do nothing congress”…DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.
1.) Conservatives used to oppose (vehemently) abortion. It was found over a fairly short timeframe that even conservatives found it to be a necessary procedure. So we are now at a stage where this acquiescence to a need outweighed a wish. A nod to human nature (mistakes, hormones, etc.) basically.
2.) Liberals have allowed wishes to overtake even their common sense (dubious as that is much of the time). The extreme and largely rejected notions of a few have yet to come full circle. See #1. It is hoped the next few months will be the slap to finally bring the hysterics to a close.
Conservatives can compromise even on something as deeply important as killing babies.
Can liberals manage the spine to compromise (or fully reject tantrum-fueled progressives)?
-------------
I see libs reject friends and family far more than any conservatives. That isn't "firm principles" in action.
That's usurped principles when you are basically talked into rejecting people in your life...
like having no principles at all.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ But your "comparison" is illogical.
1).How have conservatives "acquiesced" to abortion? They spent decades stacking SCOTUS to achieve a single narrow end, and did it....under the shabby principle of State's rights..
Now they're losing in the states and demand rule changes.
I fail to see "acquiescence".
So should Ukraine be licensed to build interceptors?DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Mincing and failing to see the larger picture in defense of your "position" is SOP.
I used a single example to try to illustrate my opinion. If you don't know any conservatives that support abortion as a necessary evil, then you really ought to get out more.
BTW Abortion is constitutionally legal. That has not changed at all.
JohnnyYou » 28 Aug 2026, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ So should Ukraine be licensed to build interceptors?
I say hell yeah
Take Yo MamaDeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Having a bit of trouble staying on topic?
Druggies suffer that a lot. Being merely tolerated by others probably comes naturally to you.
It is bigotry, is what it is - this tendency to disown people. The term bigot ceom from the dutch for "By God". It refers to an unflexible and uninquisitive nature. You've heard "the walls have ears" - a cautionaary saying calling for discretion. In the case of today's insane left, the new saying is, "The ears have walls". Leftists are so conditioned to hate first and listen later that there is just no getting through.DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.
1.) Conservatives used to oppose (vehemently) abortion. It was found over a fairly short timeframe that even conservatives found it to be a necessary procedure. So we are now at a stage where this acquiescence to a need outweighed a wish. A nod to human nature (mistakes, hormones, etc.) basically.
2.) Liberals have allowed wishes to overtake even their common sense (dubious as that is much of the time). The extreme and largely rejected notions of a few have yet to come full circle. See #1. It is hoped the next few months will be the slap to finally bring the hysterics to a close.
Conservatives can compromise even on something as deeply important as killing babies.
Can liberals manage the spine to compromise (or fully reject tantrum-fueled progressives)?
-------------
I see libs reject friends and family far more than any conservatives. That isn't "firm principles" in action.
That's usurped principles when you are basically talked into rejecting people in your life...
like having no principles at all.
When you really stop and think about it, life isn't that hard to live.Cannonpointer » 29 Aug 2026, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ It is bigotry, is what it is - this tendency to disown people. The term bigot ceom from the dutch for "By God". It refers to an unflexible and uninquisitive nature. You've heard "the walls have ears" - a cautionaary saying calling for discretion. IN the case of today's insane left, the new saying is, "The ears have walls". Leftists are so conditioned to hate first and listen later that there is just no getting through.
Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ But your "comparison" is illogical.
1).How have conservatives "acquiesced" to abortion? They spent decades stacking SCOTUS to achieve a single narrow end, and did it....under the shabby principle of State's rights..
Now they're losing in the states and demand rule changes.
I fail to see "acquiescence".
Giving the build specs of classified military gear to a kleptocracy is precisely your level, child.JohnnyYou » 28 Aug 2026, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ So should Ukraine be licensed to build interceptors?
I say hell yeah
Before we proceed with the delimbing...Cannonpointer » 29 Aug 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑There are 23 red states. Of these, 13 are "full ban" states, give or take. GA has it for six weeks - I have no idea whether the folks counting this view that as a full ban, as I do.
- States Allowing Abortion on Demand — Some red states, like Florida, allow abortion up to 15 weeks, while others have more restrictive laws.
- Total Abortion Bans — Thirteen states have enacted total bans on abortion, with few exceptions, impacting access significantly.
- Variability in Access — Access to abortion varies widely even within red states, with some allowing it under specific circumstances.
So there are ten red states, give or take, that still allow abortion - two of which allow it for up to 20 weeks (AZ and NC). You can say it isn't, but that IS a compromise. Show me ONE blue state that'll compromise about ANYTHING. You people are deranged.
Also, states rights are not shabby. They are more democratic than leaving power with the feds. THE CLOSER TO THE PEOPLE, THE MORE DEMOCRATIC. You may be too stupid to understand this, but the state is closer to the people than the federal government. The county is closer than the state.
The war is getting pretty ramped up.Cannonpointer » 29 Aug 2026, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Giving the build specs of classified military gear to a kleptocracy is precisely your level, child.
Coupkraine will be a land-locked rump state in a year. Let it build whatever it wants to build. But no one with sense is going to give Coupkraine classified information. That's just happy horse **** they dribble to droolers like you
You are an ant crawling the leg of an elephant with delusions of rape.Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2026, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑ Before we proceed with the delimbing...
Is this evidence of "acquiescence"?
You haven't seen anything. You've HEARD ****. And **** is what it was.JohnnyYou » 30 Aug 2026, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑ The war is getting pretty ramped up.
A depot was taken out in Kyiv.. Ukraine is taking shyt out at breakneck speed in Russia.
I never thought I would ever see anything like this in my lifetime.
Why does Putin target innocent old people watching TV in their apartments? What startegic advantage does that provide.Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2026, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You haven't seen anything. You've HEARD ****. And **** is what it was.
The ukies fired 1400 drones and missiles, and hit 8 targets. The Russians hit whatever they aim at. The west is out of interceptors.
You listen to western propaganda and become a DC bot, spewing from your mouth the **** they put in your ears. Putin is obeying the laws of war as written by the victors after WWII. COUPKRAINE is the one focusing on strictly civilian targets.JohnnyYou » 31 Aug 2026, 3:24 am » wrote: ↑ Why does Putin target innocent old people watching TV in their apartments?
It's like you're my shill, just here to lob for me. It's **** embarrassing, really.JohnnyYou » 31 Aug 2026, 3:24 am » wrote: ↑ At least 20 Wildberries distribution facilities are toast. Along with everyday Russians inventories stored there in.
I would explain the timeframe if I thought it worth the key strokes. It's enough for me that the claim got you to brag about coupkraine focusing exclusively on civilian targets.
Hw magnanimous - especialy for a thoroughly propagandized retard.JohnnyYou » 31 Aug 2026, 3:24 am » wrote: ↑ Suchominous provides almost daily reports of targets hit by Ukraine. I will agree it does look like Putin has decided to strike more strategic targets and I do hear about Russian wins and agree they are under reported.
Yes, yes - every apartment building they target is "strategic." And every military or dual purpose strike Russia makes is barbaric.JohnnyYou » 31 Aug 2026, 3:24 am » wrote: ↑ It was disheartening to see that Ukraine started striking civilians in Moscow. They are largely strategic strikes.
I think your thought process is logical, and sober... As distasteful as killing babies is... there are times when it may the best of various bad options (i.e. Rape, Incest, and Severe handicaps and/or deformities)... I think MOST Republicans accept that... as is the case relating to a NUMBER of other issues... I HONESTLY think MOST Republicans are just looking for the BEST solution available !DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.
1.) Conservatives used to oppose (vehemently) abortion. It was found over a fairly short timeframe that even conservatives found it to be a necessary procedure. So we are now at a stage where this acquiescence to a need outweighed a wish. A nod to human nature (mistakes, hormones, etc.) basically.
2.) Liberals have allowed wishes to overtake even their common sense (dubious as that is much of the time). The extreme and largely rejected notions of a few have yet to come full circle. See #1. It is hoped the next few months will be the slap to finally bring the hysterics to a close.
Conservatives can compromise even on something as deeply important as killing babies.
Can liberals manage the spine to compromise (or fully reject tantrum-fueled progressives)?
-------------
I see libs reject friends and family far more than any conservatives. That isn't "firm principles" in action.
That's usurped principles when you are basically talked into rejecting people in your life...
like having no principles at all.