Uh....what was the evidence, did she furnish a pants suit with a hole in the crotch?Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. Mr. Trump’s argument therefore ignores the bulk of the evidence at trial, misinterprets the jury’s verdict, and mistakenly focuses on the New York Penal Law definition of “rape” to the exclusion of the meaning of that word as it often is used in everyday life and of the evidence of what actually occurred between Ms. Carroll and Mr. Trump.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
It certainly does, regardless of your feelings.
I asked you a direct question.....are you pleading the 5th, Chicken ****?
Stop trying to tell me how stuff you're too stupid to understand works.Beekeeper » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Correct. The JURY did not have any finding that RAPE, per the NY State Penal Code, happened.
What a JUDGE INTERPRETS has nothing to do with what the JURY'S VERDICT WAS!!
Inform yourself...
Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stop trying to tell me how stuff you're too stupid to understand works.
Why was he obliged to opine?
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Irrelevant.Beekeeper » Today, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ What was the Jury's answer to Question 1 on the Verdict Form??
GO!!
YOU TOTALLY SAID THAT, ****!!
Beekeeper » Thu Sep 03, 2026 8:13 am » wrote: ↑
Thu Sep 03, 2026 8:13 am
What was the Jury's answer to Question 1 on the Verdict Form??
GO!!
Irrelevant.
I DID, ****!!!Blackvegetable » Today, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Then quote me to that effect.
You, on the other hand, have insisted that the presiding judge's opinion is wrong.
They just can't stand it that Kash Patel is restoring dignity and accou - sorry, gotta puke...Blackvegetable » 29 Aug 2026, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ The FBI previously refused to hire job applicants if they admitted to hiring sex workers or stealing from an employer — or engaging in acts of bestiality.
Today, those acts, which are mostly illegal across the country, are no longer automatic deal breakers for applicants to the nation's top law enforcement agency.
In June, the FBI quietly lowered some of the standards it uses when it conducts background checks on would-be federal agents and other personnel. According to multiple sources briefed on the matter, the FBI did so to facilitate hiring in some cases, even if candidates acknowledged they engaged in sexually deviant activities or stole from an employer.
The move comes as the FBI has lost scores of employees through firings, retirements and resignations since the start of the Trump administration.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-candid ... tes-theft/
I think it is important to distinguish traditional deviant values from liberal deviant values...
NARCISSISTS can NEVER accept FACTS and REALITY!!