Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑FIFYHuey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Not at all. I find it amusing about how triggered you get over people ammosexuals who legally conceal carry.
Not at all.
2 conditions
Yep!!
2 million, in favor of Plaintiff.
No, EXACTLY because Rape.
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, EXACTLY because Rape.
Hence the words of the PRESIDING judge..
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean CarrollBeekeeper » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How many times do you need your *** KICKED before you "get it" ****???
There was NO FINDING
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
The civil jury wasn't bound by the criminal code.
You're a **** IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Blackvegetable » Today, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ The civil jury wasn't bound by the criminal code.
Hence 2 million dollars.
!! PERIOD!!Had they voted "Yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?Beekeeper » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You're a **** IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course they are bound by the NY State criminal code.
So why do you believe a FINDING to the contrary matters?Beekeeper » Today, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ YOu KNOW the answer, ****, so why do you insist on asking some redundant question that has been answered before???
no...I've told you that the finding is irrelevant...it has no bearing on the VERDICT.
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ no...I've told you that the finding is irrelevant...it has no bearing on the VERDICT.