Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2026, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑FIFYHuey » 30 Aug 2026, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Not at all. I find it amusing about how triggered you get over people ammosexuals who legally conceal carry.
Not at all.
2 conditions
Yep!!Blackvegetable » 30 Aug 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not about the finding....it's about the VERDICT
2 million, in favor of Plaintiff.
No, EXACTLY because Rape.
Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ No, EXACTLY because Rape.
Hence the words of the PRESIDING judge..
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean CarrollBeekeeper » 31 Aug 2026, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ How many times do you need your *** KICKED before you "get it" ****???
There was NO FINDING
Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
The civil jury wasn't bound by the criminal code.
You're a **** IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ The civil jury wasn't bound by the criminal code.
Hence 2 million dollars.
!! PERIOD!!Had they voted "Yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?Beekeeper » 31 Aug 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course they are bound by the NY State criminal code.
Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Had they voted "Yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?
So why do you believe a FINDING to the contrary matters?Beekeeper » 31 Aug 2026, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ YOu KNOW the answer, ****, so why do you insist on asking some redundant question that has been answered before???
YOU are the one making some big **** deal out of it. ****!! NOT ME doing the DUMBASSERY **** HERE!!Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ So why do you believe a FINDING to the contrary matters?
no...I've told you that the finding is irrelevant...it has no bearing on the VERDICT.
Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2026, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ no...I've told you that the finding is irrelevant...it has no bearing on the VERDICT.