All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the convictionBlackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Then shut the **** up.Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
If voiding the conviction was a declaration of innocence, allowing Grafton to retry him would constitute Double Jeopardy..
**** idiot.
I provide citations...Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All I know is
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I provide citations...
And Reason.
To correct your uninformed perception isn't "spin"...
Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the convictionBlackvegetable » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Then shut the **** up.Huey » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
If voiding the conviction was a declaration of innocence, allowing Grafton to retry him would constitute Double Jeopardy..
**** idiot.
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I provide citations...Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
And Reason.
To correct your uninformed perception isn't "spin"...
It doesn't "void" the facts established at trial.Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
Their is no spin, el Douche.
Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the convictionBlackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Then shut the **** up.
If voiding the conviction was a declaration of innocence, allowing Grafton to retry him would constitute Double Jeopardy..
**** idiot.
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I provide citations...Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
And Reason.
To correct your uninformed perception isn't "spin"...
Their is no spin, el Douche. You lost. And you are not man enough to admit. That is why you are alone. You do not act like a man and lie.
Tell you what. Prove you are a man and answer one question with a yes or no answer.
Did the NH Supreme Court overturn the verdict, VOIDING the conviction? Yes or no ****?
The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑It doesn't "void" the facts established at trial.Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
Their is no spin, el Douche.
Do you understand this?
Which fact am I refusing to acceptHuey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on.
You lose.
Sucks for you, huh, pumpkin??NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
You had your shot. You refused to answer the yes or no question. You keep deleting the facts. You lose.Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Which fact am I refusing to acceptHuey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on.
You lose.
Which fact am I unwilling to accept?Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You had your shot. You refused to answer the yes or no question. You keep deleting the facts. You lose.
Don't spam me on this again, Puss.
NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
I haven't refused to accept that fact.
Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Which fact am I unwilling to accept?Huey » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You had your shot. You refused to answer the yes or no question. You keep deleting the facts. You lose.
Don't spam me on this again, Puss.
NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I haven't refused to accept that fact.
But that doesn't change any of the facts I've presented
So why is he back to negotiating with Grafton?
I haven't refused to accept that fact.
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I haven't refused to accept that fact.
Do you accept the facts that
It makes no difference with respects of the facts determined at trial
His attorney stated for the record that the defendant doesn't contest the charges.
He is being prosecuted by Grafton
I haven't refused to accept that fact.
No...it isn't
Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No...it isn't
Do you accept the facts that It makes no difference with respects of the facts determined at trial His attorney stated for the record that the defendant doesn't contest the charges. He is being prosecuted by Grafton
The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on.