Liberal Forum

Then my work here is done. 


Haunting 


Taunting




 

Johnny You » Today, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:42 am

Federal and State should be separate elections.

If I owned property in multiple states I would want to vote for Governor in each..
 

Don't have a problem with a person voting local elections, it is federal elected representatives one gets to vote for once in their primary residence they have to live in for more than 6 months a year.

Realities are fruitions of social consensus not an honest definition genetic outcomes living in plain sight 24/7. New World Orders are realities ancestries sacrifice their biological time to believe life exceeds personal time adapting in space daily here since conceived into their specific time alive by rotations existing born to buried.
Life exists conceived to decomposed back into periodic elements that form cellular results of life in an atmosphere universally displaced now.

Back to 3 words that made my brain question humanity all the time, "self evident results".

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on. 

You lose.

 

Hey, asshole, why not post the second sentence of the "citation" that contains the entire context of what the lawyer said?  **** ******.....  

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Hey, asshole, why not post 

Why don't you practice what you preach?

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on. 

You lose.


 

Hey, asshole, why not post the second sentence of the "citation" that contains the entire context of what the lawyer said?  **** ******.....  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Hey, asshole, why not post 

Why don't you practice what you preach?

 

Try that again with out the edit.  And you go full ****** on this because there is no PG for this thread.

I can post whatever the **** I want.  Tell me, why do you create a call out thread but a need a safe space from the replies of the one you are calling out?  That is a ****** move.  I think since I stomped your *** I will discuss that here.
 

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Try that again with out the edit.  

Do you accept the facts?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Hey, asshole, why not post 

Why don't you practice what you preach?

 

Why don't you?  Oh wait, you don't

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Now I really know I gave the ****** an epic beatdown! LMAO!

Why do you run from EVERY question?

 

I don't, but you do.  

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

@Blackvegetable   wants to call me out with a callout thread but is too much of a ****** to allow my comments to stay in the primary thread.

****** needs a safe space, doesn't he?

Not my words haunting....and taunting 

 

Sorry, I don't deal with Pussies who need to use PG in a call out thread.  We will discuss there.  You don't haunt and your taunts are child like.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Try that again with out the edit.  

Do you accept the facts?

 

I accept the fact you posted part of a quote from the lawyer.

Why do you have to use PG on a callout thread?  Are you really that big a ******?

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Why don't you?  Oh wait, you don't


 

Do you accept the facts?

If you don't, you are the zerointegrity little **** of whom you yap, ZeroIntegrity Little **** of Whom You Yap...

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I accept the fact you posted part of a quote from the lawyer.


 

Do you accept THE FACTS?

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Why don't you?  Oh wait, you don't



 

Do you accept the facts?

If you don't, you are the zerointegrity little **** of whom you yap, ZeroIntegrity Little **** of Whom You Yap...

 

Why do you start a call out thread and then hide behind PG like a girly man?  And you, Puss, are in no position to lecture anyone on integrity.
Meltdown Mary is here!    

You haven't posted facts. Of they were not contesting the act why the fuc did they appeal, idiot?  And then win.  He is now an innocent man and your OP is **** because you did ot read your **** articles.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I accept the fact you posted part of a quote from the lawyer.



 

Do you accept THE FACTS?

 

Already answered.  Why are a ****** that starts a call out thread and then hides behind PG?

It is because you truly are a coward.
 

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Already answered.  Why are a ****** that starts a call out thread and then hides behind PG?

It is because you truly are a coward.

Opening paragraph of the OP...


whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN. 


Do you now acknowledge the fact that he is BEING prosecuted?
 

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Already answered.  Why are a ****** 

That ****** crap doesn't wash.

 

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Opening paragraph of the OP...

whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN. 

Do you now acknowledge the fact that he is BEING prosecuted?

Facts:

1.  He was prosecuted.

2. The conviction was overturned, VOIDING the verdict.

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

That ****** crap doesn't wash.

sure it does.  You show it every, single day.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

sure it does.  You show it every, single day.

tiny,

It's your go to....whenever you're running from your stupid.


Which is in every context, 24/7.
 

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Facts:

1.  He was prosecuted.

2. The conviction was overturned, VOIDING the verdict.

is being prosecuted for election fraud,


why is this in the present tense?


Try to answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Facts:

1.  He was prosecuted.

2. The conviction was overturned, VOIDING the verdict.

is being prosecuted for election fraud,


why is this in the present tense?


Try to answer the question. 

 

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?

This is from the tail beast:


Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.
 

@Blackvegetable  

I think I will carry the Colt CT556 today.  What do you think?