Liberal Forum

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?

This is from the tail beast:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.

No, you don't,  Oblivious Little Pile of Dung...

It's the 1st paragraph of the OP...



Acknowledge the fact.
 

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

@Blackvegetable  

I think I will carry the Colt CT556 today.  What do you think?

I think that's incredibly gay..

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I think that's incredibly gay..

it’s a ducking pocket knife *******.  Lmao

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?

 

viewtopic.php?p=2927542#p2927542


Literally 24 hours ago.

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

it’s a ducking pocket knife *******.  Lmao

You don't think that's gay?

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

viewtopic.php?p=2927542#p2927542

Literally 24 hours ago.

Your sources are fighting each other.

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Your sources are fighting each other.

That he "was convicted" and "is being prosecuted" are not mutually exclusive...


This is true even if you are too stupid to understand why.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:28 am

Dismissed.

GO **** YOURSELF, ****!!

You have ZERO authority to dismiss anyone or anything!! Except in your **** TDS imagination that is!! 

You're a **** DUPLICITOUS            !!

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

That he "was convicted" and "is being prosecuted" are not mutually exclusive...

This is true even if you are too stupid to understand why.

You're an IDIOT, cupcake!!       

       

Blackvegetable » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

Huey » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Your sources are fighting each other.

That he "was convicted" and "is being prosecuted" are not mutually exclusive...


This is true even if you are too stupid to understand why.

 

This is from your daily beast article


Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.Renewable energy company American Ag Energy will repair and maintain the pool’s sewage and purification systems, according to the official contract description. The one-year contract could be extended for another five years and grow to up to $8.8 million, CNN reported.The company’s CEO, Richard Rosen, was convicted last year of voter fraud for casting ballots in the 2016 election in both Massachusetts and New Hampshire. He told the Daily Beast by phone on Friday that his conviction has since been thrown out. 

Your cut and paste says this:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN.

Who changed it?  Somebody **** you over.  Or yuo did it yoursel.  What source did you really get that from?  The actual daily beast article DOES NOT say what you claim and that is why yu can't find another source

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Huey » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

it’s a ducking pocket knife *******.  Lmao

You don't think that's gay?

 

No.  But you fell for it.  I know you would.  Do you tell the men of Salem and your state that they are gay for carrying?

No, you don't.  Because you are a ******.

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

This is from your daily beast article

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.Renewable energy company American Ag Energy will repair and maintain the pool’s sewage and purification systems, according to the official contract description. The one-year contract could be extended for another five years and grow to up to $8.8 million, CNN reported.The company’s CEO, Richard Rosen, was convicted last year of voter fraud for casting ballots in the 2016 election in both Massachusetts and New Hampshire. He told the Daily Beast by phone on Friday that his conviction has since been thrown out. 

Your cut and paste says this:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN.

Who changed it?  Somebody **** you over.  Or yuo did it yoursel.  What source did you really get that from?  The actual daily beast article DOES NOT say what you claim and that is why yu can't find another source

No.  But you fell for it.  I know you would.  Do you tell the men of Salem and your state that they are gay for carrying?

No, you don't.  Because you are a ******.

In appealing the verdict, Rosen said Botelho admitted to voting in his name, but Grafton County Superior Court precluded that evidence from the trial and denied Rosen's request for a Richards hearing to address Botelho's testimony. 

A Richards hearing is a legal proceeding that investigates the circumstances surrounding an alleged violation of discovery rules. 

The Supreme Court agreed with Rosen and overturned the verdict, saying the trial court incurred unfair prejudice in the jury by withholding this evidence.



"Should Botelho on remand assert his Fifth Amendment rights, the trial court shall conduct a (Richards) hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant's conviction and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion," the Supreme Court said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/con ... 00262.html


Before I go any further, demonstrate thar you understand the meaning of the text in bold.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

This is from your daily beast article

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.Renewable energy company American Ag Energy will repair and maintain the pool’s sewage and purification systems, according to the official contract description. The one-year contract could be extended for another five years and grow to up to $8.8 million, CNN reported.The company’s CEO, Richard Rosen, was convicted last year of voter fraud for casting ballots in the 2016 election in both Massachusetts and New Hampshire. He told the Daily Beast by phone on Friday that his conviction has since been thrown out. 

Your cut and paste says this:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN.

Who changed it?  Somebody **** you over.  Or yuo did it yoursel.  What source did you really get that from?  The actual daily beast article DOES NOT say what you claim and that is why yu can't find another source

No.  But you fell for it.  I know you would.  Do you tell the men of Salem and your state that they are gay for carrying?

No, you don't.  Because you are a ******.

In appealing the verdict, Rosen said Botelho admitted to voting in his name, but Grafton County Superior Court precluded that evidence from the trial and denied Rosen's request for a Richards hearing to address Botelho's testimony. 

A Richards hearing is a legal proceeding that investigates the circumstances surrounding an alleged violation of discovery rules. 

The Supreme Court agreed with Rosen and overturned the verdict, saying the trial court incurred unfair prejudice in the jury by withholding this evidence.



"Should Botelho on remand assert his Fifth Amendment rights, the trial court shall conduct a (Richards) hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant's conviction and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion," the Supreme Court said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/con ... 00262.html


Before I go any further, demonstrate thar you understand the meaning of the text in bold.
 

 

Lil one, I am not interested. He is not being prosecuted right now.  What I want to know is how was the daily beast article changed?  You didn't do it but whoever told you about it did.  So, of yo are going to go with the what you cut and paste, link to it.  If not, you have no case.

Now source it, Puss.


 

I did not know pools were equipped with sewage systems.. But I guess in DC they are probably needed.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Lil one, I am not interested. 

then shut the **** up.

Again.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

then shut the **** up.

Again.

Which article are you using?  Pick one.  We using the linked article or the one you copied and pasted.  They say two different thinks.  Why are such a coward to link your source?

What you deleted:

Lil one, I am not interested. He is not being prosecuted right now.  What I want to know is how was the daily beast article changed?  You didn't do it but whoever told you about it did.  So, iuf yo are going to go with the what you cut and pasted, link to it.  If not, you have no case.

Now source it, Puss
 

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Which article are you using?  

Do you understand what the Supreme Court said?

Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Which article are you using?  Pick one.  We using the linked article or the one you copied and pasted.  They say two different thinks.  Why are such a coward to link your source?

What you deleted:

Lil one, I am not interested. He is not being prosecuted right now.  What I want to know is how was the daily beast article changed?  You didn't do it but whoever told you about it did.  So, iuf yo are going to go with the what you cut and pasted, link to it.  If not, you have no case.

Now source it, Puss

This one....you should have continued reading. 

The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings, CNN reported. Rosen confirmed this occurred in a call with the Daily Beast, saying, “I am now innocent.” He is now in mediation with the New Hampshire attorney general’s office over the charges.



It is EXACTLY as I surmised...by remanding the case back, the Supreme Court tested Rosen's bluff...

There's no chance the gardener will take the fall.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

Which article are you using?  Pick one.  We using the linked article or the one you copied and pasted.  They say two different thinks.  Why are such a coward to link your source?

What you deleted:

Lil one, I am not interested. He is not being prosecuted right now.  What I want to know is how was the daily beast article changed?  You didn't do it but whoever told you about it did.  So, iuf yo are going to go with the what you cut and pasted, link to it.  If not, you have no case.

Now source it, Puss

This one....you should have continued reading. 

The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings, CNN reported. Rosen confirmed this occurred in a call with the Daily Beast, saying, “I am now innocent.” He is now in mediation with the New Hampshire attorney general’s office over the charges.



It is EXACTLY as I surmised...by remanding the case back, the Supreme Court tested Rosen's bluff...

There's no chance the gardener will take the fall.
 

 

1.  Post the **** source.  Because what you cut and pasted into the OP does not match the Daily Beast link.

2.  You did not surmise ****.  You are repeating what you are told.

3.  Contrary to the words in your OP he is not being prosecuted.  He is an innocent man.  Post the **** sure ******.  Isn't that what you called people who do not post their sources?

Yo are **** coward.

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

1.  Post the **** source.  Because what you cut and pasted into the OP does not match the Daily Beast link.

2.  You did not surmise ****.  You are repeating what you are told.

3.  Contrary to the words in your OP he is not being prosecuted.  He is an innocent man.  Post the **** sure ******.  Isn't that what you called people who do not post their sources?

Yo are **** coward.

1, 2. The link in the OP, of course.


3. Why is he talking to the State Attorney General?

I better see a **** answer.


 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

1.  Post the **** source.  Because what you cut and pasted into the OP does not match the Daily Beast link.

2.  You did not surmise ****.  You are repeating what you are told.

3.  Contrary to the words in your OP he is not being prosecuted.  He is an innocent man.  Post the **** sure ******.  Isn't that what you called people who do not post their sources?

Yo are **** coward.

1, 2. The link in the OP, of course.


3. Why is he talking to the State Attorney General?

I better see a **** answer.


 

 

1.  You are liar.  The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.

2.  DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.  

3.  Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?