Liberal Forum

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

1.  You are liar.  The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.

2.  DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.  

3.  Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?

1. It did when I cut and pasted it....

2. The same **** link.

3. It's digital, you **** idiot...it can be continually updated.


Now answer, Yeastie...
 

Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

40 minutes ago

Huey » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

1.  Post the **** source.  Because what you cut and pasted into the OP does not match the Daily Beast link.

2.  You did not surmise ****.  You are repeating what you are told.

3.  Contrary to the words in your OP he is not being prosecuted.  He is an innocent man.  Post the **** sure ******.  Isn't that what you called people who do not post their sources?

Yo are **** coward.

1, 2. The link in the OP, of course.


3. Why is he talking to the State Attorney General?

I better see a **** answer.


 


 

1.  You are liar.  The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.

2.  DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.  

3.  Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

1.  You are liar.  The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.

2.  DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.  

3.  Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?

1. It did when I cut and pasted it....

2. The same **** link.

3. It's digital, you **** idiot...it can be continually updated.


Now answer, Yeastie...
 

 

******, what you cut and pasted does not match what is at the link.    I figured it out ******:

Updated Sep. 4 2026 4:57PM EDT Published Sep. 4 2026 7:46AM EDT 

You posted it BEFORE they corrected the error.

We are done here.  There were WRONG with the initial post.  They corrected it.  So all of your ranting and raving claiming he was being prosecuted is ****, ******.

Now admit he is not being prosecuted.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:31 am

Huey » Yesterday, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:48 am

I don't give a ****.  Not exactly sure what your point is either but I am not going to whine about.

A guy convicted of voter fraud, with a long time history of casting duplicate votes in General elections...

Imagine your orgasm were you to catch an illegal immigrant doing it ONCE.

 

His conviction was overturned, the verdict VOIDED.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:33 am

Huey » Today, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:30 am

Already answered.  Why are a ****** that starts a call out thread and then hides behind PG?

It is because you truly are a coward.

Opening paragraph of the OP...


whose chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud, according to CNN. 


Do you now acknowledge the fact that he is BEING prosecuted?
 

 

No, he is not being prosecuted, as I stated.  The daily beast corrected that error.

******, I don't believe you got that from the Daily Beast, ******.
 

Huey » Today, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:15 am

All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.

This is an EPIC thread fail.  ****, I got you so **** up you are bumping PG Safe Space ****** Gallery threads.

C’mon man, brown’s a failed financier, read a few legal opinions, and now he thinks he’s Roy Cohn incarnate…  slack needed…
 

Huey » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

His conviction was overturned, the verdict VOIDED.

No, he is not being prosecuted, as I stated.  The daily beast corrected that error.

******, I don't believe you got that from the Daily Beast, ******.

Simple question. 

Did you read the article yesterday morning?

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Simple question. 

Did you read the article yesterday morning?

The article was corrected .  You were wrong.  

Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

The article was corrected .  You were wrong.

What did I get wrong?

Huey » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

The article was corrected .  You were wrong.

Is that a yes, or a no?

Huey » Yesterday, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:36 am

The question is did he do this a private citizen or with the blessing of his company. He is an 85 year old man who has a history of supporting his community.


 

****...