Liberal Forum

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I knew about that because it took some work to confirm his party affiliation. 

It was remanded back to the district court, where he is currently negotiating.

None of the facts are contested..

Right now you and the daily beast are liars.  You left out the real important detail.

Need some proof of what you just posted.

https://youtu.be/l7ER08F9rGo?is=DzalVuHTRlrJZjra

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

7x?


The old man faced 7 years.....

Maybe the "confession" was too suss...

Cause he's back in Grafton court.
 

 

The conviction was overturned, Dum Dum.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

https://youtu.be/l7ER08F9rGo?is=DzalVuHTRlrJZjra

 

If you knew about it you lied by omission.  
 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

The OP
Post where the daily beast story shows that the conviction was overturned.

I asked you to post it..


It was remanded back to Grafton.

They're at liberty to retry him.

He now knows he won't go to jail. This makes it entirely unecessary for the gardener to take a fall....which is why he is negotiating rather than taking a chance of being reconvicted..
 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Post the lie..



 


 

A legally blind 87 year old was regularly doing all  of that traveling to vote twice in two staes:Belmont election officials testified at the trial that registered voters, like Rosen, are not required to show photo identification when getting an absentee ballot. In Holderness, Rosen went in person to get an absentee ballot and received help from the town clerk filling it out. Rosen is legally blind.

 During the trial in which jurors were not informed that another man regularly voted for Rosen, prosecutors presented evidence that Rosen had voted in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts in multiple elections. Donovan wrote that the evidence of other alleged illegal votes for which he was not charged with a crime resulted in the jury being prejudiced against Rosen.

https://indepthnh.org/2026/04/09/north- ... sachusetts.

You should have spent less time tracking down his party affiliation, asshole, and more time on the **** facts.
 
 

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

If you knew about it you lied by omission.

Post this lie....


The Court didn't make any statement about the alleged confession.

It was purely procedural.
 

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

A legally blind

Post my lie...

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

I asked you to post it..


It was remanded back to Grafton.

They're at liberty to retry him.

He now knows he won't go to jail. This makes it entirely unecessary for the gardener to take a fall....which is why he is negotiating rather than taking a chance of being reconvicted..
 

 

So post where it was remanded back to Grafton.

As of this moment he is not convicted.  To say so is a lie.  
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Post my lie...

 

The OP.  The fact that he is convicted.  The conviction was OVERTURNED.  
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

The OP.  The fact that he is convicted.  The conviction was OVERTURNED.

Post my lie...

WTF is wrong with you.

Just do it.
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Post this lie....


The Court didn't make any statement about the alleged confession.

It was purely procedural.
 

 

There is another lie.  The court certainly did, asshole:Rosen, 87, was found guilty of a class B felony in 2024 for allegedly voting in the 2016 general election in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts. But, the Supreme Court ruled Grafton Superior Court Judge Lawrence MacLeod erred by not allowing jurors to know that Rosen’s Massachusetts groundskeeper, Billy Botelho, confessed to investigators that he had voted in Rosen’s name.“Botelho’s statements either impliedly or expressly constitute confessions to voting in the defendant’s name during the November 2016 election — the same election for which the defendant was charged with double voting,” Associate Justice Patrick Donovan wrote in the unanimous decision.

IBID

Read more, lie less.


 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Post my lie...

WTF is wrong with you.

Just do it.
 

 

There is no conviction.  It was overturned. I also just posted another of your lies.  

You are a mentally diseased individual.  Just admit you are wrong.  
 

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

There is no conviction.  

Incredible.
.


Where's this " lie"?

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

There is no conviction.  It was overturned. I also just posted another of your lies.  

You are a mentally diseased individual.  Just admit you are wrong.

“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.






The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings, CNN reported.

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

Incredible.
.


Where's this " lie"?

 

Yes, your reluctance to say the conviction was overturned, meaning the verdict is cancelled, is incredible.

There is no conviction.  It was overturned. I also just posted another of your lies.  

You are a mentally diseased individual.  Just admit you are wrong.  


 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.






The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings, CNN reported.

 

The verdict is null and void.  Your words:

Blackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
28 minutes ago
Post this lie....


The Court didn't make any statement about the alleged confession.

It was purely procedural.

That is a lie.  

Again:

Rosen, 87, was found guilty of a class B felony in 2024 for allegedly voting in the 2016 general election in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts. But, the Supreme Court ruled Grafton Superior Court Judge Lawrence MacLeod erred by not allowing jurors to know that Rosen’s Massachusetts groundskeeper, Billy Botelho, confessed to investigators that he had voted in Rosen’s name.“Botelho’s statements either impliedly or expressly constitute confessions to voting in the defendant’s name during the November 2016 election — the same election for which the defendant was charged with double voting,” Associate Justice Patrick Donovan wrote in the unanimous decision.

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Yes, your reluctance to say the conviction was overturned, meaning the verdict is cancelled, is incredible.

There is no conviction.  It was overturned. I also just posted another of your lies.  

You are a mentally diseased individual.  Just admit you are wrong.

Now that you understand that the appeal was preceded by an admission to the charged conduct, as well as the matter being remanded back to the inferior court, would you like to revise your comment?

Before you bleed out.

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

The verdict is null and void.  Your words:

That is a lie.  

Again:

Rosen, 87, was found guilty of a class B felony in 2024 for allegedly voting in the 2016 general election in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts. But, the Supreme Court ruled Grafton Superior Court Judge Lawrence MacLeod erred by not allowing jurors to know that Rosen’s Massachusetts groundskeeper, Billy Botelho, confessed to investigators that he had voted in Rosen’s name.“Botelho’s statements either impliedly or expressly constitute confessions to voting in the defendant’s name during the November 2016 election — the same election for which the defendant was charged with double voting,” Associate Justice Patrick Donovan wrote in the unanimous decision.

It merely points out that the confession was excluded...it offers no comment on its veracity.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.






The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings, CNN reported.

 

Here is another excellent article that will explain this to you:

https://patch.com/new-hampshire/concord ... ire-voting

No context.

Ever.