Liberal Forum

Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Even after it was updated, and I showed you the proof, you did not believe until I posted the update time.

Why are you **** bothering me still with this "save your ***" reframey ****?  HE IS NOT BEING PROSECUTED at this time and he is an innocent man.

Let me know when the trial starts.

Even after it was updated, and I showed you the proof, you did not believe until I posted the update time.

This is a lie.

Why are you **** bothering me still with this "save your ***" reframey ****?  HE IS NOT BEING PROSECUTED at this time 

Then tell me why you believe he is "in negotiations" with the AG..

Let me know when the trial starts. 

Don't confuse it with "prosecution"...

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Huey » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

48 minutes ago

Even after it was updated, and I showed you the proof, you did not believe until I posted the update time.

Why are you **** bothering me still with this "save your ***" reframey ****?  HE IS NOT BEING PROSECUTED at this time and he is an innocent man.

Let me know when the trial starts.

Even after it was updated, and I showed you the proof, you did not believe until I posted the update time.

This is a lie.

Why are you **** bothering me still with this "save your ***" reframey ****?  HE IS NOT BEING PROSECUTED at this time 

Then tell me why you believe he is "in negotiations" with the AG..

Let me know when the trial starts. 

Don't confuse it with "prosecution"...

 

Negotiations are not a prosecution, ya lying ****.  Let me know when the prosection starts, ******.

You lost, bitch.  ;)

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Negotiations are not a prosecution, ya lying ****.  Let me know when the prosection starts, ******.

You lost, bitch.  

When do you believe prosecution starts?

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Negotiations are not a prosecution, ya lying ****.  Let me know when the prosection starts, ******.

You lost, bitch.  

When do you believe prosecution starts?

 

Just post the date.  Is the reason you live along, womanless, with no friends is because you can never admit it when you are wrong?
 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Just post the date.  

It is ongoing.


Unless.you can show me evidence that the state has dropped the case...


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 1:41 pm

Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 1:37 pm

Where did he admit he did it?  And he is legally blind.  How in the world did he do all of this?  

Like I said, the verdict was voided.  There is nothing in the news about the trial court retrying the case of negotiating.

You were even asked if you understood it.


“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 2:11 pm

Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 2:08 pm

Hey, *******, you need to spend less time deleting and reading the information provided.

“
His defense lawyer was on the NH supreme court?  

This statement,  you **** *******.


“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted

 

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?

This is from the tail beast:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.

No, you don't,  Oblivious Little Pile of Dung...

It's the 1st paragraph of the OP...



Acknowledge the fact.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:57 am

@Blackvegetable  

I think I will carry the Colt CT556 today.  What do you think?

I think that's incredibly gay..

 

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:14 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?


 

viewtopic.php?p=2927542#p2927542


Literally 24 hours ago.

 

Seeing a lot of questions answered.

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 1:41 pm

Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 1:37 pm

Where did he admit he did it?  And he is legally blind.  How in the world did he do all of this?  

Like I said, the verdict was voided.  There is nothing in the news about the trial court retrying the case of negotiating.

You were even asked if you understood it.


“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 2:11 pm

Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2026, 2:08 pm

Hey, *******, you need to spend less time deleting and reading the information provided.

“
His defense lawyer was on the NH supreme court?  

This statement,  you **** *******.


“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?

This is from the tail beast:

Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to CNN.

No, you don't,  Oblivious Little Pile of Dung...

It's the 1st paragraph of the OP...



Acknowledge the fact.
 


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:57 am

@Blackvegetable  

I think I will carry the Colt CT556 today.  What do you think?

I think that's incredibly gay..


 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 12:14 pm

Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am

I need a link to something showing that.  I can't find anything about a second trial.  And why did it take you so long to come up with this?



 

viewtopic.php?p=2927542#p2927542


Literally 24 hours ago.


 

Seeing a lot of questions answered.

 

We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.


That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:00 am

Should we proceed on the assumption that you do not want to discuss that evidence, or it's implications for Mr. Rosen's status?

Can we proceed on the EVIDENCE that the COURT EXCLUDED that IMPLICATED SOMEONE ELSE VOTING FOR ROSEN?? Which the INVESTIGATORS had a CONFESSION did so!!

Fact is, the PROSECUTION has YET to refile charges!! So that USUALLY MEANS that since APRIL, they are not too confident in their ability to WIN, ****!!

THAT has to really SUCK FOR YOU, right, cupcake??         

AND ROSEN IS INNOCENT and has NOT BEEN PROVEN TO BE GUILTY since that SHAM CONVICTION was totally tossed by the STATE SUPREME COURT!! SUCKS even more, huh. pumpkin??         

Keep PANTY DANCING!! It looks like the ****** YOU ARE, DOUCHBAG!!

https://media.tenor.com/MR4F5m5O5QwAAAA ... an-flu.gif
 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:44 am

 

Then all that's left is demonstrating that you did...

it’s not about me, brown…you demonstrated it…
 

ROG62 » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

it’s not about me, brown…you demonstrated it…

What is "it"?

Beekeeper » Today, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:06 am

Can we proceed on the EVIDENCE that the COURT EXCLUDED that IMPLICATED SOMEONE ELSE VOTING FOR ROSEN?? Which the INVESTIGATORS had a CONFESSION did so!!


 

Yes...

His gardener.

One of them committed voter fraud.

 

Huey » Today, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:57 am

We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.

That is not an admission.

What is it?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:57 am

We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.
 
That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

 

What is it?

 

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

That is not an admission.  

What is it?

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

 

What is it?

 

That is not an admission.  And do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

That is not an admission.  

What is it?

 

What up 37x?
 

Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

  Right nnow he is an innocent man.

Who declared him Innocent?

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

What up 37x?

You don't answer questions, Fredo.

Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

40 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:57 am

We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.
 
That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

What is it?

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong

Who declared him Innocent?

 
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

You don't answer questions, Fredo.

I don't answer your questions if you are not answering mine, 37x. Just clearing up the record.