Liberal Forum

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I don't answer your questions if you are not answering mine, 

I already proved that you are lying about that, Fredo.

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

 

Pointless.

Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Huey » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

55 minutes ago

What is it?

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

That is not an admission.  Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started?  Right nnow he is an innocent man.  I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong

Who declared him Innocent?

 
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

 

Pointless.

 

It is pointless for me to indulge your reframing lies but it is so much fun, ******.

How's the daily Beast doing?  
 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

I don't answer your questions if you are not answering mine, 

I already proved that you are lying about that, Fredo.

 

****.

1 day where it took you **** hours to answer doesn't prove you right.  Take the pledge or STFU.  Or maybe I'll the guy who pepper sprayed you and get him to do it.

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

****.

1 day where it took you **** hours to answer doesn't prove you right.  

I posted it

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

****.

1 day where it took you **** hours to answer doesn't prove you right.  

I posted it

 

Take the pledge.  If not, **** off with your questions.  My way or the highway, ******.

You are also arguing that your source, even corrected, is wrong.  AL to safe your ignorant ***.

Huey » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

It is pointless for me to indulge your reframing lies but it is so much fun, ******.

How's the daily Beast doing?

First you would need to post these "lies"

How's the daily Beast doing?

how's your search for what the DB got wrong going?

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Take the pledge.  

You're not a credible counterparty.

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:36 am

Seeing a lot of questions answered.

Longest wait...

19 minutes..
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Take the pledge.  

You're not a credible counterparty.

 

 

I guarantee you under penalty of a week off.  Costs you nothing, ******.  Well it does.  It costs you control.  Which is the point, bitch.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

It is pointless for me to indulge your reframing lies but it is so much fun, ******.

How's the daily Beast doing?

First you would need to post these "lies"

How's the daily Beast doing?

how's your search for what the DB got wrong going?

 

1.  I am under no obligation to do anything, bitch.  I know you grew up privileged and spoiled.  This is real life, bitch.

2.  What the daily beast got wrong is posted.  And according to the daily beast the conviction was overturned, meaning it was voided.  You lose, bitch.
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I guarantee you under penalty of a week off.  Costs you nothing, ******.  Well it does.  It costs you control.  Which is the point, bitch.

How much do you pay for that?  

We could all chip in and give Sole Patrol a long vacation...
 

Huey » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

****.

1 day where it took you **** hours to answer doesn't prove you right.  Take the pledge or STFU.  Or maybe I'll the guy who pepper sprayed you and get him to do it.

Longest wait in sample


19 minutes.
 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:29 pm

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

I guarantee you under penalty of a week off.  Costs you nothing, ******.  Well it does.  It costs you control.  Which is the point, bitch.

How much do you pay for that?  

We could all chip in and give Sole Patrol a long vacation...
 

 

You have the terms.  Have a nice day.

Huey » Today, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:49 pm

I guarantee you under penalty of a week off.  Costs you nothing, ******.  Well it does.  It costs you control.  Which is the point, bitch.

Tiny,

Anything subject to your interpretation is written in sand.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:19 pm

Yes...

His gardener.

One of them committed voter fraud.

So NOW you ADMIT that his conviction WAS OVERTURNED!! BECAUSE evidence was RULED TO BE EXLUDED which totally cleared his of WRONGDOING!! 

Oh, and it was REMANDED BACK to the lower court since the conviction was NOT overturned WITH PREJUDICE!! THAT is how COURTS handle things. 

Since the DA has YET to refile charges, the "negotiations" are likely for a NON-REFILING of this **** CHARGE!! 

You're a **** IDIOT!! And you know NOTHING about court proceedings like YOU want people to think you do, ****!!

                 

Beekeeper » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

So NOW you ADMIT that his conviction WAS OVERTURNED!! BECAUSE evidence was RULED TO BE EXLUDED which totally cleared his of WRONGDOING!! 


 

No...it didn't. 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

No...it didn't.

Yes it did MORON!!!

You love the COMMIE JUSTICE SYSTEM and fail to understand that IN THIS NATION, everyone is INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY!! NOT that you have to PROVE innocence!!

And he has NOT BEEN PROVEN GUILTY in any FAIR TRIAL!! THAT'S what the State Supremes RULED, *******!! His conviction was TOSSED TOTALLY!! NO CONVICTION still establishes INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY!!

You have to be THE MOST MORONIC PIECE OF **** that every sucked air, ****!!

Beekeeper » Today, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:41 pm

Yes it did MORON!!!

You love the COMMIE JUSTICE SYSTEM and fail to understand that IN THIS NATION, everyone is INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY!! NOT that you have to PROVE innocence!!

And he has NOT BEEN PROVEN GUILTY in any FAIR TRIAL!! THAT'S what the State Supremes RULED, *******!! His conviction was TOSSED TOTALLY!! NO CONVICTION still establishes INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY!!

You have to be THE MOST MORONIC PIECE OF **** that every sucked air, ****!!

The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s motions regarding territorial jurisdiction, sufficiency, and weight of the evidence, but reversed the conviction due to the evidentiary errors and remanded for further proceedings.


https://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampsh ... -0509.html

you gotta learn to stop making s​​​​hit up.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:30 pm

Tiny,

Anything subject to your interpretation is written in sand.

ok, bitch.  Don’t expend the energy by writing a sentence that ends with a (?).