Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

When they were cleaning the sewer lines, the name Trump came up more than a New York Times Article, which interestingly enough, also contains sewer lines.

"Cleaning the sewer lines"

Just post your source...
 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Sometime before he was charged in December 2022...



 

Right now he is "in negotiations" with the State.

 

 

Right now he is not being prosecuted.  'nuff said.  

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

"Cleaning the sewer lines"

Just post your source...

Ed Norton.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

"Cleaning the sewer lines"

Just post your source...
 

 

What source gave you the daily beast story in the OP?
 

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

What source gave you the daily beast story in the OP?

He's scanning the book of knowledge that he inherited from Biden's wire-headed, press secretary.....he'll be with you in a minute.

Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

What source gave you the daily beast story in the OP?

Already told you.

Why is Rosen in negotiations with the AG of NH?
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:23 pm

The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s motions regarding territorial jurisdiction, sufficiency, and weight of the evidence, but reversed the conviction due to the evidentiary errors and remanded for further proceedings.

https://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampsh ... -0509.html

you gotta learn to stop making s​​​​hit up.

So, the bottom line is that the conviction was OVERTURNED!!

Amazing how that works, huh, cupcake??

 

Beekeeper » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

So, the bottom line is that the conviction was OVERTURNED!!

Amazing how that works, huh, cupcake??

Reversed and remanded for "further proceedings".

Why is Rosen in negotiations with the AG of NH?

RebelGator » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Ed Norton.

Remember that.

Huey » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Right now he is not being prosecuted.  'nuff said.

Wrong..


Why is he in negotiations with the state AG?

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Already told you.

Why is Rosen in negotiations with the AG of NH?
 

 

viewtopic.php?p=2928284#p2928284

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Wrong..


Why is he in negotiations with the state AG?

 

Then you should be able to post the date the 2nd prosecution started.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Already told you.

Why is Rosen in negotiations with the AG of NH?

Since you are "so **** smart", why don't YOU tell us why Rosen is in negotiations with the AG of NH!!!

GO!!

Or run, as you ALWAYS DO, right ****??       

         

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Then you should be able to post the date the 2nd prosecution started.

The original prosecution is ongoing.

now answer the question. 

Beekeeper » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Since you are "so **** smart", why don't YOU tell us why Rosen is in negotiations with the AG of NH!!!


 

Of course...

I answer your questions....and my own.


Acknowledge that this is so because I am much smarter that you, and I will.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

The original prosecution is ongoing.

now answer the question. 

 

Links please.  The original conviction of the first prosecution has been voided.  It is over.  
 

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Links please.  The original conviction of the first prosecution has been voided.  It is over.

Of course.


With your pledge that you will then answer the question from which you have run for several days.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Of course.


With your pledge that you will then answer the question from which you have run for several days.
 


 

Only if you are answering questions on a one for one basis.  I also showed where I answered your "negotiations" question.

My way or no way.
 
 

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Only if you

You have been answered. As the record makes clear.

You were offered yet another answer, in advance.....

This is to demonstrate, once again, that YOUR pledge is not worth ****.

Let's get on with it.
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

You have been answered. As the record makes clear.

You were offered yet another answer, in advance.....

This is to demonstrate, once again, that YOUR pledge is not worth ****.

Let's get on with it.
 

 

You haven't taken the pledge yet.  Let me know when you do.  Say it and your questions will be answered one at a time.    ANd I have answered your negotiations question.

Only if you are answering questions on a one for one basis.  I also showed where I answered your "negotiations" question.

My way or no way.