Liberal Forum

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I don't give **** because he is not being prosecuted 

You are wrong.


He is being prosecuted until there are no further proceedings..


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:52 am

Already told you.

Why is Rosen in negotiations with the AG of NH?

Post your citation with source…
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You are wrong.


He is being prosecuted until there are no further proceedings..


 

 

The prosecution is over, the conviction is voided.  

A new prosecution will begin when charges are filed in court.
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

When charges are filed in court.  When does the trial start?  The original case is over and the conviction is voided.

That is not a trial....it precedes the issuance of a warrant...



 

Beekeeper » Today, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:49 am

You nor your dog are smarter than the **** it produces, ****!!

EVER!!! 

The FACT that you are a g'damn COMMUNIST tells everyone how **** EASILY MANIPULATED you are, and that's NOT a trait of "smart people", *******!!

You know why he included the dog, right? Without the dog, brown makes a double lobotomy recipient look like Einstein!   
 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

The prosecution is over, the conviction is voided.  

A new prosecution will begin when charges are filed in court.

The prosecution is over when the state opts not to retry...

Feel free to.post the announcement..


I think it is time for you to bring something concrete..


He is in negotiations with the ATTORNEY GENERAL...
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

That is not a trial....it precedes the issuance of a warrant...



 

 

Let me know when it starts.  If they are still investigating it means they have started a new prosecution.

Just admit you were **** wrong, dickhead.

This is over. Don't **** bother me anymore on this until the new trial starts. This is why you live along.  You are a dick. 
 

ROG62 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You know why he included the dog, right? Without the dog, brown makes a double lobotomy recipient look like Einstein! 

You're a **** idiot.

I added the dog and, later, any turdgobbling hornpout...

 

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

That is correct.

Note the "and".

Then shouldn’t it say “or”?

Prosecutions are different from trials.
 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Let me know when it starts.  If they are still investigating it means they have started a new prosecution.

Just admit you were **** wrong, dickhead.

 

It started before Dec 2022.

This is over. 

Oh....no....cause here comes the pain, again.


 

ROG62 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Then shouldn’t it say “or”?


 

No....

Not all prosecutions end in trials...

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Let me know when it starts.  If they are still investigating it means they have started a new prosecution.

 

If they are STILL investigating, then they didn't stop investigating.

But that's not what they are doing.

They are NEGOTIATING.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

It started before Dec 2022.



Oh....no....cause here comes the pain, again.


 

 

The investigation that started Dec 22 is over.  He is innocent at the moment.  Waiting on the 2nd.

And this time If there is a 2nd) they will have to allow the confession by the other guy.  Good luck
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

If they are STILL investigating, then they didn't stop investigating.

But that's not what they are doing.

They are NEGOTIATING.

 

Richard Rosen is a free, innocent man.  

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Richard Rosen is a free, innocent man.

He's free...but not innocent...

Limit yourself to what you can establish by evidence..

It is as I surmised...

The State has him dead to rights..

The details are pretty funny.

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

The investigation that started Dec 22 is over.  

with what part of "further proceedings" do you struggle?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

He's free...but not innocent...

Limit yourself to what you can establish by evidence..

It is as I surmised...

The State has him dead to rights..

The details are pretty funny.

 

Richard Rosen is free and with a voided conviction he is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  ANd this time they will have to allow the confession from the gardener.  
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

with what part of "further proceedings" do you struggle?


 

Richard Rosen is free and with a voided conviction.  ANd this time they will have to allow the confession from the gardener.  

 
 

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Richard Rosen is free and with a voided conviction.  ANd this time they will have to allow the confession from the gardener.

Read that justicia citation you don't understand, again
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Read that justicia citation you don't understand, again
 

 

Richard Rosen is free and with a voided conviction.  ANd this time they will have to allow the confession from the gardener.

Rosen is not in jail and his conviction was voided.