Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

58 minutes ago

No JuCo didn't.. He supports voter fraud..

no, he doesn’t, johnny…which is why he posted the doled out sentencing, fines, etc…
 

Blackvegetable » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

48 minutes ago

 ClitFace,

Barely worth the work of deleting...

yet you did, anyway…why are you so **** gd’damned stupid?
 

ROG62 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

yet you did, anyway…why are you so **** gd’damned stupid?

This place is a peanut factory...

ROG62 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

yet you did, anyway…why are you so **** gd’damned stupid?

How else would I know?


**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:36 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:45 pm

I don't give a **** what his defense attorney said.  I give a **** what the State Justice said.  I also note you deleted another of your lies:

It becomes a fact...

They aren't litigated on appeal.

 I also note you deleted another of your lies:

Huh?
 

 

All that matters is the conviction was voided.  You got busted. 
 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:15 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:36 am

The question is did he do this a private citizen or with the blessing of his company. He is an 85 year old man who has a history of supporting his community.

Justice was served. I doubt the OP starter read the entire article concerning his crime. The company was never mentioned again after the opening para.

Voter fraud is for the wealthy..

The problem is that BV did not tel us that the conviction was overturned, voided, because his Gardner admitted to voting in the guys name.

The Gardner is not rich.
 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

All that matters is the conviction was voided.  You got busted.

If we truly hunted for voter fraud I think we would be surprised..

A MAGAt on dot urg claimed he cast six votes for Trump.   Multi state voting is an elite past time.

I was registered  in two states at once in 2016.. I only voted in Maryland..
 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:16 pm

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

All that matters is the conviction was voided.  You got busted.

If we truly hunted for voter fraud I think we would be surprised..

A MAGAt on dot urg claimed he cast six votes for Trump.   Multi state voting is an elite past time.

I was registered  in two states at once in 2016.. I only voted in Maryland..
 

 

There was voter fraud.  Except it was not the man BV said it was.  In the retards zest to hammer trump ad MAGA, his TDS prevented him from doing proper research on the topic and it bit him in the ***.  BV, being an epic dick, refuses to admit he was wrong.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:23 am

Because it is irrelevant. 

Why was Kaplan obliged to clarify?

Nope!! VERY RELEVANT seeing how YOU CLAIMED he was a "crook" when the COURTS TOSSED THE CONVICTION which makes him NOT A CROOK!!

SHUT THE **** UP YOUR DUMBER THAN PIG **** COMMIE ****!!

And we aren't talking about Kaplan here, or did getting your *** MUTILATED AGAIN require changing the topic. AS YOU ALWAYS DO WHEN THAT HAPPENS!!

                   

Beekeeper » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Nope!! VERY RELEVANT seeing how YOU CLAIMED he was a "crook" when the COURTS TOSSED THE CONVICTION which makes him NOT A CROOK!!

SHUT THE **** UP YOUR DUMBER THAN PIG **** COMMIE ****!!

And we aren't talking about Kaplan here, or did getting your *** MUTILATED AGAIN require changing the topic. AS YOU ALWAYS DO WHEN THAT HAPPENS!!

                 

Trump was impeached.  Weak minded Republicans  tossed the conviction...

Trump is still the Greatest Grift to Mankind.. 
 

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

All that matters is the conviction was voided.  You got busted.

No, it isn't. 

What matters is that a rich white REPUBLICAN ADMITTED to engaging in voter fraud....not only will White Privilege get him out of jail time, but now the SAVE Act Administration is handing him tax payer money to fix a very expensive problem caused by the Worst POTUS ever.....at tax  payer expense.


 

JohnnyYou » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

This place is a peanut factory...

clowns included…
 
 

Beekeeper » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Nope!! VERY RELEVANT seeing how YOU CLAIMED he was a "crook" when the COURTS TOSSED THE CONVICTION which makes him NOT A CROOK!!


 

His conviction was reversed on a procedural error.

None of the facts established at trial change...


Now tell me why Kaplan was obliged to clarify...

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

No, it isn't. 

What matters is that a rich white REPUBLICAN ADMITTED to engaging in voter fraud....not only will White Privilege get him out of jail time, but now the SAVE Act Administration is handing him tax payer money to fix a very expensive problem caused by the Worst POTUS ever.....at tax  payer expense.

Taxpayers can't  foot the bills anymore.

Interest on the debt alone is trillion a year.  

The more I learn about economics the more terrifying it gets..  

 

JohnnyYou » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Taxpayers can't  foot the bills anymore.

Interest on the debt alone is trillion a year.  

The more I learn about economics the more terrifying it gets..  

Splutnick, BeSent, and Hacksit are **** idiots..

Yes....but

A) at current levels the threat is overstated

B) There are several discreet reasons why the debt is at that level, and it takes a bit of discipline to figure out what they are and who's responsible.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

All that matters is the conviction was voided.  You got busted.

No, it isn't. 

What matters is that a rich white REPUBLICAN ADMITTED to engaging in voter fraud....not only will White Privilege get him out of jail time, but now the SAVE Act Administration is handing him tax payer money to fix a very expensive problem caused by the Worst POTUS ever.....at tax  payer expense.


 

 

No, he didn't. The NH Supreme says you are lying. 


 

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

No, he didn't. The NH Supreme says you are lying.

No...all the SC said was that the trial judge erred in excluding evidence.


You have no idea how this works.

Appeals do not relitigate the facts...they only concern themselves with Procedure. 

 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

No, he didn't. The NH Supreme says you are lying.

No...all the SC said was that the trial judge erred in excluding evidence.


You have no idea how this works.

Appeals do not relitigate the facts...they only concern themselves with Procedure. 

 

 

All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.

This is an EPIC thread fail.  ****, I got you so **** up you are bumping PG Safe Space ****** Gallery threads.  

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.

 

Then shut the **** up.

If voiding the conviction was a declaration of innocence, allowing Grafton to retry him would constitute Double Jeopardy..


**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

His conviction was reversed on a procedural error.

None of the facts established at trial change...

Now tell me why Kaplan was obliged to clarify...

It was  ERRORS ON EVIDENCE , not procedure, DUMB ****!!

The state supreme court overturned the conviction and remanded the case to Grafton County Superior Court after finding the trial judge had made improper evidentiary rulings

!!

Now that has to SUCK FOR YOU, huh, cupcake??