Two widdle babies
By jerra b
5 Sep 2026 1:43 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Sep 2026 5:31 pm
//////AI Overview The "mess" in Missouri refers to a major election and redistricting crisis caused by Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins. [1] (https://electionlawblog.org/2026/missou ... principle/), [2] (https://www.reuters.com/legal/governmen ... 026-09-05/)
5 Sep 2026 9:07 pm
They're pieces pf ****, no doubt. But you seem more infantile than they.jerrab » 05 Sep 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Babies cry when they don' get their way.
The republicans want to increase the retirement age and reduce benefits.
Litigation works in steps. Pretending that following the logical progress of a case is fit throwing is, itself, fit throwing.
You're having a conniption.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
5 Sep 2026 9:11 pm
He's a studier, for sure. He's making all the moves.jerrab » 05 Sep 2026, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Also the gerrymandering was to protect trump from getting impeached over the bbb which gave to billionaires.
******
The connection between these terms centers on President Donald Trump’s major domestic legislative package, known as the "Big Beautiful Bill" (BBB), and the mid-decade gerrymandering campaign he launched to maintain a Republican House majority to block ongoing impeachment attempts
The problem is his shamelessness. He says the quiet parts out loud, and he doesn't even try to pretend he is up to anything good.
You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, and and wait, wait...
Okay, lemme try again: Trump can tell all of the people to **** off all of the time, and some of the people will hear a benediction. The rest can **** off. Playa gotta play, nyigga.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2026 5:04 am
I did not say everything I read.Cannonpointer » 05 Sep 2026, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ They're pieces pf ****, no doubt. But you seem more infantile than they.
Litigation works in steps. Pretending that following the logical progress of a case is fit throwing is, itself, fit throwing.
You're having a conniption.
6 Sep 2026 5:10 am
/////It appears our statewide elected officials are confused about what their jobs are. Late Friday, Secretary of State Denny Hoskins and Attorney General Catherine Hanaway appealed the unanimous Missouri Supreme Court decision striking down the gerrymandered congressional districts to the U. S. Supreme Court.
Let me see if I understand this. The attorney general, whose job is to defend Missouri law, is saying if she doesn't like Missouri law, she'll just go over the Supreme Court's head and make it a national case.
As for the secretary of state, instead of following state laws that govern how referendum issues are put on the ballot, he said it was unconstitutional, a decision that was way above his pay grade.
Now that the Missouri Supreme Court, which I believe consists of five Republicans and two Democrats, and is also the body that makes the decisions on what is and what isn't constitutional, makes its decision, Hoskins, whose job is to follow what the Missouri Supreme Court says is constitutional, refuses to accept it.
Someone needs to tell Hoskins and Hanaway that their bosses aren't in the White House.
Their bosses are the ones who will be voting in the referendum in November.
What a bunch of crybabies.
The story is on The Turner Report. ///
Let me see if I understand this. The attorney general, whose job is to defend Missouri law, is saying if she doesn't like Missouri law, she'll just go over the Supreme Court's head and make it a national case.
As for the secretary of state, instead of following state laws that govern how referendum issues are put on the ballot, he said it was unconstitutional, a decision that was way above his pay grade.
Now that the Missouri Supreme Court, which I believe consists of five Republicans and two Democrats, and is also the body that makes the decisions on what is and what isn't constitutional, makes its decision, Hoskins, whose job is to follow what the Missouri Supreme Court says is constitutional, refuses to accept it.
Someone needs to tell Hoskins and Hanaway that their bosses aren't in the White House.
Their bosses are the ones who will be voting in the referendum in November.
What a bunch of crybabies.
The story is on The Turner Report. ///
6 Sep 2026 5:28 am
Social semantics practiced by organized group think to convince each ancestor alive they are only typecast people born to buried daily here. Everyone gets to pick their contextual stereotype listed in rule of law in every village of ancestries every generation ignoring how evolving happens by heartbeats not rotations of the planet so far.jerra b » 05 Sep 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Two Missouri Republican U.S. House nominees on Friday asked the U.S. District Court here to reinstate a GOP-led gerrymander of congressional district lines thrown out by the state Supreme Court.
The move represents a second legal avenue to try to get the federal courts to intervene. Two other GOP officials, Attorney General Catherine Hanaway and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, previously said they would take the matter directly to the U.S. Supreme Court with an appeal there.
:rofl: :rofl: :wah: :wah: :rofl: :rofl: :clap: :clap: :wah: :wah: :huh:
It is a series parallel time existing in plain sight, not relative time pretending now isn't eternity through incorporating a 7 day schedule 52 weeks winter solstice to winter solstice of one's local hemisphere 1461 rotations every February 29.
Earth rotates only 1460 times every 4 years, not factual 1461. There is genetic outcomes' missing link that doesn't physically happen except in intellectual interpretations of time management of people cradle to grave living daily here so far.
6 Sep 2026 6:10 am
Cannonpointer » 05 Sep 2026, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ They're pieces pf ****, no doubt. But you seem more infantile than they.
Litigation works in steps. Pretending that following the logical progress of a case is fit throwing is, itself, fit throwing.
You're having a conniption.
Their plans c and d, will be said after monday
6 Sep 2026 6:30 am
Planning artificial tomorrows doesn't explain the current evolving as actually existing so far.
6 Sep 2026 8:31 am
jerrab » 05 Sep 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Two Missouri Republican U.S. House nominees on Friday asked the U.S. District Court here to reinstate a GOP-led gerrymander of congressional district lines thrown out by the state Supreme Court.
The move represents a second legal avenue to try to get the federal courts to intervene. Two other GOP officials, Attorney General Catherine Hanaway and Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, previously said they would take the matter directly to the U.S. Supreme Court with an appeal there.
6 Sep 2026 8:36 am
stay on message like a good nurtured mind since birth knows how to comply with reality stating what humanity means tomorrow.
6 Sep 2026 8:56 am
And if democrats appealed to the US Supreme court after losing to the state Supreme court republicans would not call them babies.Cannonpointer » 05 Sep 2026, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑ They're pieces pf ****, no doubt. But you seem more infantile than they.
Litigation works in steps. Pretending that following the logical progress of a case is fit throwing is, itself, fit throwing.
You're having a conniption.
Plus Hoskins really thought they would get a gold plated hall pass.
6 Sep 2026 9:10 am
6 Sep 2026 9:23 am
https://www.newstribune.com/news/2026/s ... for-usage/
Secretary of State Denny Hoskins and Missouri Republicans suffered blows Thursday after two Supreme Court reversals.The state's highest judicial authority ruled Hoskins did not have the authority to keep two key ballot measures out of the November general election.
The Supreme Court's decisions Thursday reversed the rulings of Cole County Presiding Judge Daniel Green last month. Green ruled in each case that Hoskins was within his right as Secretary of State to declare certificates of insufficiency on both measures, deeming them unconstitutional.The first was a referendum on state lawmakers' redrawn congressional map to give Republicans a likely 7-1 majority. The court all concurred to reverse in this case, with an opinion authored by Judge Ginger Gooch.
The second was a citizen-initiated petition to strengthen protections for the initiative petition process, titled Amendment 6. The court all concurred to reverse in this case, also with an opinion by Gooch.
The rulings represent a significant blow to Missouri Republicans' legislative agenda.In 2025, Gov. Mike Kehoe called a special session of the General Assembly to create the Missouri First Map, a gerrymandered layout that projected to flip the 5th Congressional District in the GOP's favor. Voters in the newly redrawn district, which now includes Cole County, elected Rick Brattin as the Republican candidate to face incumbent Emanuel Cleaver in November.
By reversing Hoskins' decision and declaring the referendum valid, the court has now called for the previous congressional map to be in effect in November.
Secretary of State Denny Hoskins and Missouri Republicans suffered blows Thursday after two Supreme Court reversals.The state's highest judicial authority ruled Hoskins did not have the authority to keep two key ballot measures out of the November general election.
The Supreme Court's decisions Thursday reversed the rulings of Cole County Presiding Judge Daniel Green last month. Green ruled in each case that Hoskins was within his right as Secretary of State to declare certificates of insufficiency on both measures, deeming them unconstitutional.The first was a referendum on state lawmakers' redrawn congressional map to give Republicans a likely 7-1 majority. The court all concurred to reverse in this case, with an opinion authored by Judge Ginger Gooch.
The second was a citizen-initiated petition to strengthen protections for the initiative petition process, titled Amendment 6. The court all concurred to reverse in this case, also with an opinion by Gooch.
The rulings represent a significant blow to Missouri Republicans' legislative agenda.In 2025, Gov. Mike Kehoe called a special session of the General Assembly to create the Missouri First Map, a gerrymandered layout that projected to flip the 5th Congressional District in the GOP's favor. Voters in the newly redrawn district, which now includes Cole County, elected Rick Brattin as the Republican candidate to face incumbent Emanuel Cleaver in November.
By reversing Hoskins' decision and declaring the referendum valid, the court has now called for the previous congressional map to be in effect in November.
6 Sep 2026 1:16 pm
Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway
·
Follow
2 days ago
·
Yesterday’s ruling was a disaster for the voters of Missouri, but we are not going to sit back. We are focused on doing everything possible to stop this crisis.
---------------------
BTW she is getting slammed
·
Follow
2 days ago
·
Yesterday’s ruling was a disaster for the voters of Missouri, but we are not going to sit back. We are focused on doing everything possible to stop this crisis.
---------------------
BTW she is getting slammed
6 Sep 2026 2:02 pm
which one sided mentality voters are you discussing? there are more than 2 sides to any issue, taking point, social point of view about a specific topic of details never same results twice.jerra b » 06 Sep 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway
·
Follow
2 days ago
·
Yesterday’s ruling was a disaster for the voters of Missouri, but we are not going to sit back. We are focused on doing everything possible to stop this crisis.
---------------------
BTW she is getting slammed
Facts are about how humans pretend life isn't self evident time adapting to space never same results as a whole each heartbeat forward since conception.
6 Sep 2026 2:42 pm
Funny how you never make one bit of sense and repeating the same crap and over does not change that.sole » 06 Sep 2026, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ which one sided mentality voters are you discussing? there are more than 2 sides to any issue, taking point, social point of view about a specific topic of details never same results twice.
Facts are about how humans pretend life isn't self evident time adapting to space never same results as a whole each heartbeat forward since conception.
6 Sep 2026 2:49 pm
What people are saying...... Hundreds of comments like these///////
he and the Mo SOS bear the burden of any confusion - the Missouri Supreme Court even noted that in a footnote!
Reply
Steve Kullman
·
Voting will be simple. Don't choose the one with an R next to their name.
Reply
Susan Haeffner
·
No one is being disenfranchised.
Reply
Gordon Fetterly
·
If you were doing your job, you would be defending the position of the Missouri Supreme Court, not opposing it.
Reply
Jeremy Anderson
·
I love when they get shocked by the fact that the law and the constitution actually exist, and that their fever dream is just that.
Reply
Tim Gagnon
·
What we’re talking about is disenfranchisement of the will of the people to have fair representation in government. The courts… See more
Reply
Kelso Karreiro
·
Good time to have a pitchfork business.
he and the Mo SOS bear the burden of any confusion - the Missouri Supreme Court even noted that in a footnote!
Reply
Steve Kullman
·
Voting will be simple. Don't choose the one with an R next to their name.
Reply
Susan Haeffner
·
No one is being disenfranchised.
Reply
Gordon Fetterly
·
If you were doing your job, you would be defending the position of the Missouri Supreme Court, not opposing it.
Reply
Jeremy Anderson
·
I love when they get shocked by the fact that the law and the constitution actually exist, and that their fever dream is just that.
Reply
Tim Gagnon
·
What we’re talking about is disenfranchisement of the will of the people to have fair representation in government. The courts… See more
Reply
Kelso Karreiro
·
Good time to have a pitchfork business.
6 Sep 2026 3:16 pm
6 Sep 2026 3:17 pm
//////////
No, the U.S. President cannot appoint state supreme court justices
/////
State authority: State supreme courts are part of state governments, not the federal
6 Sep 2026 3:19 pm
jerrab » 06 Sep 2026, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ State authority: State supreme courts are part of state governments, not the federal
no problem, get kehoe to do it.
Who is online
In total there are 4192 users online :: 0 registered, 15 bots, and 4177 guests
Registered users:
Bots: TTD-Content, ADmantX, CriteoBot, FDM, Adsbot, DuckDuckGo, GPTBot, Baiduspider, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7