Two widdle babies
By jerra b
5 Sep 2026 1:43 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 9:12 am
/////The result leaves Missouri’s congressional elections in an extraordinary posture. The state’s highest court has held that the 2022 map is the only map legally in force under Missouri law,
Yesterday 9:17 am
///////The Supreme Court Rules: The Missouri Supreme Court stepped in and ruled unanimously against Hoskins. The court stated he was wrong to block the petition and ordered that the 2022 voting map must be used for November instead. [1] (https://www.facebook.com/kmbc9/posts/a- ... 351039945/), [2] (https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdC4j1-h0eN/)Hoskins Defies the Court: Despite the ruling, Hoskins sent out emails instructing local election officials to use the new, banned map anyway. He and Attorney General Catherine Hanaway pointed to a separate, conflicting order from a federal judge to defend their actions. [1] (https://www.kctv5.com/2026/09/09/show-m ... p-dispute/)Contempt of Court: Because Hoskins defied the state's highest court, the Missouri Supreme Court has ordered him to appear in court immediately to explain why he shouldn't be punished for violating their order. [1] (https://www.kctv5.com/2026/09/09/show-m ... p-dispute/)
Yesterday 10:01 am
jerrab » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ///////The Supreme Court Rules: The Missouri Supreme Court stepped in and ruled unanimously against Hoskins. The court stated he was wrong to block the petition and ordered that the 2022 voting map must be used for November instead. [1] (https://www.facebook.com/kmbc9/posts/a- ... 351039945/), [2] (https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdC4j1-h0eN/)Hoskins Defies the Court: Despite the ruling, Hoskins sent out emails instructing local election officials to use the new, banned map anyway. He and Attorney General Catherine Hanaway pointed to a separate, conflicting order from a federal judge to defend their actions. [1] (https://www.kctv5.com/2026/09/09/show-m ... p-dispute/)Contempt of Court: Because Hoskins defied the state's highest court, the Missouri Supreme Court has ordered him to appear in court immediately to explain why he shouldn't be punished for violating their order. [1] (https://www.kctv5.com/2026/09/09/show-m ... p-dispute/)
**** THESE LIBERAL JUDGES
Yesterday 10:33 am
It appears it's too late to change the map for this cycle per Federal guidelines.
I take it you are not buying the "Blue Wave" theory?
Yesterday 10:41 am
Ft Leonard Wood
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Yesterday 10:52 am
Fuelman » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It appears it's too late to change the map for this cycle per Federal guidelines.
I take it you are not buying the "Blue Wave" theory?
no concern about the cheating gop.party.
Yesterday 10:55 am
I also wonder if, since it’s a federal election (Congress), that federal rulings have top priority…Fuelman » Today, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ Clark based the TRO principally on two different federal constitutional claims stemming from the fact that Missouri already held its primary under HB 1.
The judge found the plaintiffs have a “high probability of success” on their claim under Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, reasoning that changing congressional districts between the primary and general election could effectively nullify some voters’ primary ballots by moving them into districts where they had no opportunity to help select the nominees.
Clark likewise found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on an Equal Protection Clause claim, reasoning that a map switch would create different classes of voters — those who remain in the same district they voted in during the primary and those who are reassigned to a different one — as well as similarly situated groups of candidates.
The court also embraced what Clark described as a “Purcell in reverse” argument. The Supreme Court’s Purcell principle generally cautions federal courts against changing election rules shortly before voting. But Clark concluded that the principle favored intervention here because the TRO preserves the congressional districts Missouri used during its primary rather than requiring another map change weeks before the general election.
“Issuing a TRO here would preserve, rather than disturb, the election rules that candidates, election officials, and voters have relied on,” Clark wrote.
The result leaves Missouri’s congressional elections in an extraordinary posture. The state’s highest court has held that the 2022 map is the only map legally in force under Missouri law, while a federal judge is now prohibiting state officials from using that map for the November congressional election.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 11:12 am
------------Fuelman » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It appears it's too late to change the map for this cycle per Federal guidelines.
I take it you are not buying the "Blue Wave" theory?
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the referendum on the 2025 map was legal, sufficient and timely and ordered it onto the Nov. 3 ballot. Because the referendum petition was filed before the new map took effect, the court held, the 2025 districts never became law and the map used in 2022 and 2024 remains in effect for the November election.
Yesterday 11:13 am
jerrab » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ------------
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the referendum on the 2025 map was legal, sufficient and timely and ordered it onto the Nov. 3 ballot. Because the referendum petition was filed before the new map took effect, the court held, the 2025 districts never became law and the map used in 2022 and 2024 remains in effect for the November election.
MAKE A BET?
Yesterday 11:18 am
Yesterday 11:18 am
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the referendum on the 2025 map was legal, sufficient and timely and ordered it onto the Nov. 3 ballot. Because the referendum petition was filed before the new map took effect, the court held, the 2025 districts never became law and the map used in 2022 and 2024 remains in effect for the November election.
Yesterday 11:51 am
Sounds like a mess to me.ROG62 » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I also wonder if, since it’s a federal election (Congress), that federal rulings have top priority…
If the primary is null and void, who's on the ballot in November?
Here is some lawyer speak:
Did Missouri Concede Away Its Redistricting Case on the Shadow Docket? - Election Law Blog https://share.google/BdFLpkhkoBJn7q9pF
Yesterday 12:01 pm
Looks like the GOP is pretty secure in Missouri:
Legislative Control
Missouri House of Representatives:
The Republican Party holds a large majority with 106 seats, compared to the Democratic minority with 52 seats (plus 5 vacancies).
Missouri State Senate:
The Republican Party maintains a 24–10 supermajority in the 34-seat chamber.
Yesterday 12:38 pm
What bothers me in your pointed facts about people choosing their character role born to buried is each brain gives away its biological time living self evidently one of a kind to mind social ideas life doesn't equally distribute each ancestor existing daily here by heart beats and decisions to obey power of suggestion or not follow people ignoring all they were since existing since a fertilized cell changing form since shaped into their ancestral position so far, here now.Fuelman » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Looks like the GOP is pretty secure in Missouri:
Legislative Control
Missouri House of Representatives:
The Republican Party holds a large majority with 106 seats, compared to the Democratic minority with 52 seats (plus 5 vacancies).
Missouri State Senate:
The Republican Party maintains a 24–10 supermajority in the 34-seat chamber.
Yesterday 1:19 pm
///////KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) - Placing the state’s top election official in what his lawyers call an ‘impossible position,’ Missouri’s attorney general filed a federal motion Wednesday to block the state Supreme Court from holding Secretary of State Denny Hoskins in contempt.
The emergency motion, filed by Attorney General Catherine Hanaway in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, asks federal Judge Stephen R. Clark to intervene and halt the state high court’s contempt proceedings.///
The emergency motion, filed by Attorney General Catherine Hanaway in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, asks federal Judge Stephen R. Clark to intervene and halt the state high court’s contempt proceedings.///
Yesterday 1:41 pm
Every post you make is around what people do in their time alive socially practicing ideas life is more than their actual time living born to buried in series parallel space now as arrived since their personal conception create by their 2 biological parents.jerra b » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ///////KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) - Placing the state’s top election official in what his lawyers call an ‘impossible position,’ Missouri’s attorney general filed a federal motion Wednesday to block the state Supreme Court from holding Secretary of State Denny Hoskins in contempt.
The emergency motion, filed by Attorney General Catherine Hanaway in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, asks federal Judge Stephen R. Clark to intervene and halt the state high court’s contempt proceedings.///
Yesterday 1:50 pm
**** off.sole » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Every post you make is around what people do in their time alive socially practicing ideas life is more than their actual time living born to buried in series parallel space now as arrived since their personal conception create by their 2 biological parents.
Yesterday 1:53 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwBo3_2K-cAsole » Today, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ What bothers me in your pointed facts about people choosing their character role born to buried is each brain gives away its biological time living self evidently one of a kind to mind social ideas life doesn't equally distribute each ancestor existing daily here by heart beats and decisions to obey power of suggestion or not follow people ignoring all they were since existing since a fertilized cell changing form since shaped into their ancestral position so far, here now.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 2:08 pm
I screwed your intellectually reality practiced by ancestral lineages for 101 generation gaps so far, like nobody else ever has since Jesus did it 2026 years ago.
Yesterday 2:13 pm
What's it like being bothered every day all day?
Who is online
In total there are 5254 users online :: 3 registered, 14 bots, and 5237 guests
Bots: DuckDuckGo, aiohttp, Bolt, okhttp, proximic, CriteoBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot, Googlebot