Liberal Forum

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Dum dum, in the jury instructions the idiot told them to follow NY State law on the definition of rape.  Even in a civil procedure, moron, you have to have guidelines.


Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.
 I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

You have no **** idea what you are yapping about...




Answer the question, Coward...

BV doesn't answer simple questions...

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

Dum dum, in the jury instructions the idiot told them to follow NY State law on the definition of rape.  Even in a civil procedure, moron, you have to have guidelines.


Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.
 I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

You have no **** idea what you are yapping about...




Answer the question, Coward...

 

My work is done here.  If you have a case you may bring it, like everyone else here, and debunk me.



AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

My work is done here.  If you have a case you may bring it, like everyone else here, and debunk me.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

You show up...yap ignorantly....run from questions...


The trial evidence of the harm to Ms. Carroll as a result of being assaulted and digitally raped supports the jury’s $2 million award as reasonable compensation for her pain and suffering. Ms. Carroll testified in detail with respect to the physical, emotional, and psychological injury she suffered after the incident with Mr. Trump

BV shows up daily lying and crying, then runs away like the little bitch boy he is.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You show up...yap ignorantly....run from questions...

The trial evidence of the harm to Ms. Carroll as a result of being assaulted and digitally raped supports the jury’s $2 million award as reasonable compensation for her pain and suffering. Ms. Carroll testified in detail with respect to the physical, emotional, and psychological injury she suffered after the incident with Mr. Trump

YOU accusing others of running from questions?  That's rich, ******.  It is only YOUR questions I don't answer, ******, because you don't answer any yourself.  

My work is done here.  If you have a case you may bring it, like everyone else here, and debunk me.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape

Huey » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

YOU accusing others of running from questions?

Answer the question.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Huey » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

 

Answer the question.
 

 

Try that again ******.



YOU accusing others of running from questions?  That's rich, ******.  It is only YOUR questions I don't answer, ******, because you don't answer any yourself.  

My work is done here.  If you have a case you may bring it, like everyone else here, and debunk me.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape

 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Try

Quimmie,

You yap about not being answered, as you are on Day 3 & 2 of running from questions..

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

 

Quimmie,

You yap about not being answered, as you are on Day 3 & 2 of running from questions..

 

Try again ******.  I am not answering YOUR questions until you pledge to ALWAYS answer on a one for one basis.

Hell, I not even going to acknowledge your questions any longer, Nointegrity ******.
 

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Try again ******. 

I've tried for days..

You don't answer questions. 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:28 pm

 

Post what you believe you proved wrong...

Not your words.




Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll


what is to be done?

What do you understand about evolving by compounding chromosomes changing population left alive tomorrow since date personally conceived equally living this rotation of the planet by heartbeat and brain minding social consensus 24/7?

Power of suggestion has corrupted every society in this atmosphere from within the species itself in plain sight of each social order demanding people stay on message, in image projected since birth, or else face crimes against humanity regardless which society of humans one joined born to buried.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I've tried for days..

You don't answer questions.

Liar or retard.....that's the only question to be settled. 

I'm going liar, you're a Democrat.

RebelGator » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Liar or retard.....that's the only question to be settled. 

I'm going liar, you're a Democrat.

A character serving humanity on the world stage beyond just another reproduction ignoring why they exist one at time in a body never same details combined so far, each heartbeat brings a new total sum lived since conception.

Evolving doesn't end because specific cycles of life stop being alive. decomposing bodies are still evolving in reverse growth patterns added since arrived a fertilized cell.

sole » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

What do you understand about evolving by compounding chromosomes changing population left alive tomorrow since date personally conceived equally living this rotation of the planet by heartbeat and brain minding social consensus 24/7?

Power of suggestion has corrupted every society in this atmosphere from within the species itself in plain sight of each social order demanding people stay on message, in image projected since birth, or else face crimes against humanity regardless which society of humans one joined born to buried.

Boring Solestopia...
 

Blackvegetable » 54 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

54 minutes ago

I've tried for days..

You don't answer questions.

There is no penetration into Huey's Cranium...