Liberal Forum

FJB » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

58 minutes ago

try it and you **** will lose another civil war

Johnny You » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

When the World is Trumpin' Down...

Five Alive Hymnal #121

viewtopic.php?p=2928116#p2928116
 
 

sole » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

That is all you know how to navigate being alive in your own skin, stay on the social narrative of your chosen social identity.

Johnny You » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I assume you know the secret to eternal life?

Do you have Medicare Part Zombie like Mitch McConnell?


 

sole » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You assume eternal life isn't the genetic outcomes reached as evolved ancestrally up to this rotation of the planet per reproduction ever existed so far.

this is what hope, faith, charity do for ancestors wishing they were exception cradle to grave.

Social consensus typecasts reproductions actually living genetically eternally separated adapting by heartbeat forward now. Compromise with deniers cradle to grave and all facts keep each ancestor complicit with denying now is eternity, the balance point of kinetic universe balancing outcomes 24/7 now.

Perpetual balancing requires perpetual motion of combined movements as a whole process developing results never same details twice. Context recites what each ancestral lineage and generation gaps have done in history developing relative time logistics promising nobody gets punished for denying all they were as conceived except anyone debunking relative time logistics used by every economic theory used daily here.

It's Biblical what social consensus does to anyone explaining actual time alive by heartbeats in plain sight.

Johnny You » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I wonder if @Deezer Shoove  could limit you to 250 characters like on Bluesky...

But he is kind of like the 12th juror on the Clancy case..  Missed Trials...
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:02 am

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb called his old boss a “rapist” on live television Saturday—and MS NOW host Jonathan Capehart immediately pushed back.

In an interview, Cobb, who served in Trump’s first administration, blasted his former boss, calling him a “malignant narcissist, convicted felon, rapist, and somebody who was really out to feather his own nest.”

Capehart then interrupted to point out that Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. “Ty, I just have to stop you… because you just called the president a rapist,” he said. “That is a legal thing that he has not been convicted of. So we’ve just got to be clear on that.”

“You’re absolutely right. He has not been convicted of it,” Cobb responded. “But the federal judge who oversaw the [E. Jean Carroll] trial said on the record that he was guilty of rape.”


“No, no, no, sexual assault,” Capehart insisted.


“No, actually, Jonathan, you’re wrong,” Cobb shot back, adding: “I’ll send you the site,” to which Capehart responded: “Please do.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/first-ter ... -tv-clash/

Capehart is an idiot.

Cobb is an attorney...

 

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Another daily beast article.  The host was 100% correct.  Ask ABC.

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

Another daily beast article.  The host was 100% correct.  Ask ABC.

ABC did not assert that Grifty is a rapist.


Ty Cobb is 100% correct.

Ask AOC, and the presiding judge.
 

 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

The False Statement: During the interview, the anchor asserted multiple times that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll

You can pay semantics all you like, ******, but asserting someone was liable for rape is the the same as asserting they are a rapist.

sole » Today, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:25 am

Aren't most juries downsized to 6 jurors instead of 12? in real time I have no peers since most people live to keep their reality going instead of their ancestral lineage.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:22 pm

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

The False Statement: During the interview, the anchor asserted multiple times that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll

You can pay semantics all you like, ******, but asserting someone was liable for rape is the the same as asserting they are a rapist.

Why won't  Trump show the money?  If it wasn't  rape? He has made billions and is trying to compensate  traitors...

The shyt show spins more than a DeNiro CBS Sunday Morning. 

Steamy Detail?

 
 

 

DeezerShoove » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

PortaJohnny isn't very coherent most of the time. He fails at attempts to be as funny and clever as BlaVe.
But then, that threshold is very low.
Being as funny and clever as a blob of old wheel bearing grease in the dirt ain't hard.

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You would have to ask Trump.

Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

The False Statement: During the 

DeezerShoove » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

PortaJohnny isn't very coherent most of the time. He fails at attempts to be as funny and clever as BlaVe.
But then, that threshold is very low.
Being as funny and clever as a blob of old wheel bearing grease in the dirt ain't hard.

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:22 pm

Huey » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

You would have to ask Trump.

Yeah, because you question very little...
 
No Polymath for YOU!

 

Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:42 am

Another daily beast article.  The host was 100% correct.  Ask ABC.

ABC did not assert that Grifty is a rapist.


Ty Cobb is 100% correct.

Ask AOC, and the presiding judge.
 


 

The False Statement: During the interview, the anchor asserted multiple times that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll

You can pay semantics all you like, ******, but asserting someone was liable for rape is the the same as asserting they are a rapist. 

 

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Huey » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

The False Statement: During the interview, the anchor asserted multiple times that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll

You can pay semantics all you like, ******, but asserting someone was liable for rape is the the same as asserting they are a rapist. 
 

No...

This is about the specific words that got George in trouble...

Not a vague description of them.

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:02 am

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb called his old boss a “rapist” on live television Saturday—and MS NOW host Jonathan Capehart immediately pushed back.

In an interview, Cobb, who served in Trump’s first administration, blasted his former boss, calling him a “malignant narcissist, convicted felon, rapist, and somebody who was really out to feather his own nest.”

Capehart then interrupted to point out that Trump wasn’t convicted of rape. “Ty, I just have to stop you… because you just called the president a rapist,” he said. “That is a legal thing that he has not been convicted of. So we’ve just got to be clear on that.”

“You’re absolutely right. He has not been convicted of it,” Cobb responded. “But the federal judge who oversaw the [E. Jean Carroll] trial said on the record that he was guilty of rape.”

“No, no, no, sexual assault,” Capehart insisted.

“No, actually, Jonathan, you’re wrong,” Cobb shot back, adding: “I’ll send you the site,” to which Capehart responded: “Please do.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/first-ter ... -tv-clash/

Capehart is an idiot.

Cobb is an attorney...

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

BuckNaked » Today, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:27 am

Omg this is all you got?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."