Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

It says sexually assaulted, 



 

Did you read the opinion?

 

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

You ca post the 

You demanded it.

I produced it.

Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read.

Now it is your turn...



( :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:  :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:)



Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?

He says so.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.

Duh Done.. Law and Order on No Holds Barred.

Bv I second the motion for dismissal  without prejudice..
 

Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.
 

You demanded it.

I produced it.

Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read.

Now it is your turn...



(                       )



Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?

He says so.

 

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.  

AN another question.  Just make a case, ******.
 

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.  

 

No...the opinion runs 60 some pages...

Now answer the question. 

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.

The first paragraph in question. 

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll first publicly claimed that businessman Donald J. Trump, as he then was, sexually assaulted (“raped”) her in the mid-1990s. Mr. Trump responded almost immediately by charging that Ms. Carroll’s claim was entirely false, that no such thing ever had happened, and that Ms. Carroll falsely accused Mr. Trump for ulterior and improper purposes. He repeated that contention in 2022 and yet again more recently. Ms. Carroll consequently sued Mr.Trump twice.

This is a **** idiot.

 
 

JohnnyYou » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Duh Done.. Law and Order on No Holds Barred.

Bv I second the motion for dismissal  without prejudice..

Do you know why Kaplan was obliged to opine?

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.

The first paragraph in question. 

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll first publicly claimed that businessman Donald J. Trump, as he then was, sexually assaulted (“raped”) her in the mid-1990s. Mr. Trump responded almost immediately by charging that Ms. Carroll’s claim was entirely false, that no such thing ever had happened, and that Ms. Carroll falsely accused Mr. Trump for ulterior and improper purposes. He repeated that contention in 2022 and yet again more recently. Ms. Carroll consequently sued Mr.Trump twice.

This is a **** idiot.

I told you I read that.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

 

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

I told you I read that.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

These are your words

That is all I needed to see.

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:27 pm

These are your words

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

The Huey Ejaculator..  

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:25 pm

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:27 pm

These are your words

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

The Huey Ejaculator..  

 

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong, continue to run with it.  As he his doing here.  He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was.  Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

Huey » Today, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:31 pm

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong, continue to run with it.  As he his doing here.  He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was.  Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

 

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong

Post what you believe you proved wrong...

Not your words.

He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

what is to be done?

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

 

Post what you believe you proved wrong...

Not your words.




Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll


what is to be done?

 

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.

See ya tomorrow.  I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.

See ya tomorrow.  I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

This was a civil procedure...

The finding was irrelevant..

To understand why, run from the following question...

"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"


Another day of running....in sheer terror.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

This was a civil procedure...

The finding was irrelevant..

To understand why, run from the following question...

"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"

Another day of running....in sheer terror.

Whe  the Huey is Trumpin' Dowm

https://youtu.be/YC8vxXC0UMc?is=ehRl-GuvAKxuvc5o

Rest the case


https://youtu.be/w8fXE7O6_B4?is=JvGM1VR4ep4pa7g4

sole » Today, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:44 am

When has BlaVe ever shown signs of coherent with self evidently evolving in his own skin since conception?

His social identity only came into existence by social consensus anyway. Same way yours did.

Didn't we all?
However, your self-denial of being human is amusing.

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:40 am

Be sure to announce when you arrive.

**** man... You try way too hard.
What is that supposed to mean?
You continue to be as funny as a rubber crutch.