Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:41 pm

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:39 pm

It says sexually assaulted, 



 

Did you read the opinion?

 

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm

You ca post the 

You demanded it.

I produced it.

Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read.

Now it is your turn...



( :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:  :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:)



Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?

He says so.

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.

Duh Done.. Law and Order on No Holds Barred.

Bv I second the motion for dismissal  without prejudice..
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:48 pm

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:44 pm

You ca post the pertinent parts you want me to pay attention to.  All I know is according to NY State law and the Jury Verdict, Trump was not liable for rape.

I am done with this one.
 

You demanded it.

I produced it.

Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read.

Now it is your turn...



(                       )



Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?

He says so.

 

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.  

AN another question.  Just make a case, ******.
 

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.  

 

No...the opinion runs 60 some pages...

Now answer the question. 

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.

The first paragraph in question. 

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll first publicly claimed that businessman Donald J. Trump, as he then was, sexually assaulted (“raped”) her in the mid-1990s. Mr. Trump responded almost immediately by charging that Ms. Carroll’s claim was entirely false, that no such thing ever had happened, and that Ms. Carroll falsely accused Mr. Trump for ulterior and improper purposes. He repeated that contention in 2022 and yet again more recently. Ms. Carroll consequently sued Mr.Trump twice.

This is a **** idiot.

 
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:49 pm

Duh Done.. Law and Order on No Holds Barred.

Bv I second the motion for dismissal  without prejudice..

Do you know why Kaplan was obliged to opine?

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:09 pm

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:01 pm

I read the first paragraph.  That is all I needed to see.

The first paragraph in question. 

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll first publicly claimed that businessman Donald J. Trump, as he then was, sexually assaulted (“raped”) her in the mid-1990s. Mr. Trump responded almost immediately by charging that Ms. Carroll’s claim was entirely false, that no such thing ever had happened, and that Ms. Carroll falsely accused Mr. Trump for ulterior and improper purposes. He repeated that contention in 2022 and yet again more recently. Ms. Carroll consequently sued Mr.Trump twice.

This is a **** idiot.

I told you I read that.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

 

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:17 pm

I told you I read that.

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

These are your words

That is all I needed to see.

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:27 pm

These are your words

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

The Huey Ejaculator..  

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 4:25 pm

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 1:27 pm

These are your words

Zerointegrity imbecile.

Now answer the question.

The Huey Ejaculator..  

 

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong, continue to run with it.  As he his doing here.  He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was.  Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 2:31 pm

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong, continue to run with it.  As he his doing here.  He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was.  Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

 

Your are defending the guy, who even after one of his OPs was proved wrong

Post what you believe you proved wrong...

Not your words.

He has been shown over and over and over that Trump was not found liable for rape by a jury he continues to claim he was

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Simply because he is to **** mentally unstable to admit he was wrong.

what is to be done?

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 3:28 pm

 

Post what you believe you proved wrong...

Not your words.




Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll


what is to be done?

 

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.

See ya tomorrow.  I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

Huey » 06 Sep 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 3:34 pm

AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition

• Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.

Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.

You lose.

See ya tomorrow.  I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.

This was a civil procedure...

The finding was irrelevant..

To understand why, run from the following question...

"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"


Another day of running....in sheer terror.

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 3:42 pm

This was a civil procedure...

The finding was irrelevant..

To understand why, run from the following question...

"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"

Another day of running....in sheer terror.

Whe  the Huey is Trumpin' Dowm

https://youtu.be/YC8vxXC0UMc?is=ehRl-GuvAKxuvc5o

Rest the case


https://youtu.be/w8fXE7O6_B4?is=JvGM1VR4ep4pa7g4

sole » 06 Sep 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 11:44 am

When has BlaVe ever shown signs of coherent with self evidently evolving in his own skin since conception?

His social identity only came into existence by social consensus anyway. Same way yours did.

Didn't we all?
However, your self-denial of being human is amusing.

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 9:40 am

Be sure to announce when you arrive.

**** man... You try way too hard.
What is that supposed to mean?
You continue to be as funny as a rubber crutch.

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 11:20 am

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

 “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan re-clarifies July 2026

“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan re-clarifies July 2026

 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2026, 12:29 pm

In each instance it is a talking head, oblivious of what they are prattling.

 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Now tell me why Rosen is talking to the AG...

The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New YorkPenal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in NewYork applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of thevagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is notcalled “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”

F-U-C-K-O-F-F…