Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
This Should Be Interesting....
This Should Be Interesting....
By Blackvegetable
6 Sep 2026 6:02 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
6 Sep 2026 7:27 pm
he has a big ego?Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You demanded it.
I produced it.
Now you're trying to make reference to text you haven't read.
Now it is your turn...
(
Why was Kaplan obliged to opine?
He says so.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
6 Sep 2026 7:37 pm
No...it isn't "re-clarifying"....ROG62 » 06 Sep 2026, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan re-clarifies July 2026
“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan re-clarifies July 2026
You're a moron.
Why was he obliged to clarify?
Amazing how easy it is...
6 Sep 2026 7:38 pm
You must have scrolled past the link.
Show everyone you aren't too stupid to understand what is written.
6 Sep 2026 7:41 pm
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similarconduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.ROG62 » 06 Sep 2026, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New YorkPenal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in NewYork applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of thevagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is notcalled “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”
F-U-C-K-O-F-F…
7 Sep 2026 12:54 am
Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ That is the public statement of an experienced attorney.
I understand that, being MAGAts, you are all far too **** stupid to grasp the gravity of it.
what does gravity have to do with it?
7 Sep 2026 3:43 am
Meet a phor man..
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
7 Sep 2026 5:31 am
That's what pins his *** to the earth.....he'll jump into the air and deny it, though.
7 Sep 2026 5:33 am
Duct Tape the unruly MAGAnootz to his seat..RebelGator » 07 Sep 2026, 5:31 am » wrote: ↑ That's what pins his *** to the earth.....he'll jump into the air and deny it, though.
https://youtu.be/LciKfZ4PPLE?is=ugDItUgwYWgqIKIP
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
7 Sep 2026 5:44 am
clinger, it can’t be more black and white… mince all you want, you dumb **** twat, but it doesn’t change the FACTS…Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s $2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similarconduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
7 Sep 2026 5:44 am
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
7 Sep 2026 5:46 am
I fully understand what was written, a judges’ feefee based post verdict / award OPINION…Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ You must have scrolled past the link.
Show everyone you aren't too stupid to understand what is written.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
7 Sep 2026 5:46 am
That's right...it can't
If you were only capable of reading it.
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
7 Sep 2026 5:48 am
Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to opine?
7 Sep 2026 5:53 am
You will forgive me, I intend to deal only with the ISSUES, not the rhetoric.
Can you break each and every one of those phrases down, and show that they are actually "bad things" in a leader?
The man's candle simply burns brighter.
Dammit, Jim! I'm a (sorry, early morning, haven't had my coffee), not a (something brilliant, or at least clever, that plays off the first one).
This is where you people get away with the breezy drive-by, cavalierly throwing labels that people are conditioned to respond-to negatively, in lieu of substance.Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Cobb, who served in Trump’s first administration, blasted his former boss, calling him a “malignant narcissist, convicted felon, rapist, and somebody who was really out to feather his own nest.”
Can you break each and every one of those phrases down, and show that they are actually "bad things" in a leader?
The man's candle simply burns brighter.
Until we universally, as men of good will and proven character, distinguish between rape and sexual assault, I think this is one of the more important drill-down-and-litigate issues facing the interwebs. I can totally support and respect a leader who has been convicted of sexual assault. But I draw the line at rape.Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ “You’re absolutely right. He has not been convicted of it,” Cobb responded. “But the federal judge who oversaw the [E. Jean Carroll] trial said on the record that he was guilty of rape.”
“No, no, no, sexual assault,” Capehart insisted.
Dammit, Jim! I'm a (sorry, early morning, haven't had my coffee), not a (something brilliant, or at least clever, that plays off the first one).
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
7 Sep 2026 5:59 am
The grave for Rebecca, age 15, mother of three from the 1700s was an eye opener.Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2026, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ You will forgive me, I intend to deal only with the ISSUES, not the rhetoric.
This is where you people get away with the breezy drive-by, cavalierly throwing labels that people are conditioned to respond-to negatively, in lieu of substance.
Can you break each and every one of those phrases down, and show that they are actually "bad things" in a leader?
The man's candle simply burns brighter.
Until we universally[/], as men of good will and proven character, distinguish between rape and sexual assault, I think this is one of the more important drill-down-and-litigate issues facing the interwebs. I can totally support and respect a leader who has been convicted of sexual assault. But I draw the line at rape.
Dammit, Jim! I'm a (sorry, early morning, haven't had my coffee), not a (something brilliant, or at least clever, that plays off the first one).
But yeah the average life span was 35 then..
I do consider these young girls know what they are doing.. But some sound like they get sucked into a horrible place...
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
7 Sep 2026 6:02 am
The average lifespan in the 1700s is a bit misleading. Yes, the AVERAGE was low. But this was due to early deaths and calamitous conditions - not to people being middle-aged at 25. 25 was still the early spring.JohnnyYou » 07 Sep 2026, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ The grave for Rebecca, age 15, mother of three from the 1700s was an eye opener.
But yeah the average life span was 35 then..
I do consider these young girls know what they are doing.. But some sound like they get sucked into a horrible place...
In the 1960s, in the third world, people were genuinely aged and withered at 40. In the US in the 1700s, Ben Franklin's generation was in fine fettle in their 80s. People were not getting old early. They were dying early.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
7 Sep 2026 6:06 am
YOU ARE A POS LIBERAL SHILL
7 Sep 2026 6:08 am
Fat Job blows..
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
7 Sep 2026 6:39 am
Dum dum, in the jury instructions the idiot told them to follow NY State law on the definition of rape. Even in a civil procedure, moron, you have to have guidelines.Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2026, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This was a civil procedure...
The finding was irrelevant..
To understand why, run from the following question...
"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"
Another day of running....in sheer terror.
AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition
- Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.
You lose.
I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
7 Sep 2026 6:42 am
Who is online
In total there are 6424 users online :: 0 registered, 10 bots, and 6414 guests
Registered users:
Bots: Nutch, NING, proximic, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7