Because he is in mediation talks with the AG...Beekeeper » 11 Sep 2026, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I did read your ****!!
The END RESULT is that from 2022 is that the CONVICTION was OVERTURNED by the STATE SUPREME COURT because the JUDGE disallowed EVIDENCE into the trial from the DEFENSE!!
And no refiling of the charges have happened!! And you can't tell us WHY that is now can you, ****??
You really need to be honest about how your body navigates time by heartbeats since conception.
Please don't..Beekeeper » 12 Sep 2026, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ You **** DUMB ****!!!
IF the AG thought that there was any case
I gave him 5 greenies for that post. I know how much that puts your panties in a twist.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑Please don't..Beekeeper » 12 Sep 2026, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑ You **** DUMB ****!!!
IF the AG thought that there was any case
You're an idiot.
I know how important it is to you to believe that.Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ I gave him 5 greenies for that post. I know how much that puts your panties in a twist.
As usual you have huffed, and puffed, but posted nothing to dispute him. If it was a slam dunk there would be NO negotiating. They would have immediately refiled.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑I know how important it is to you to believe that.Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ I gave him 5 greenies for that post. I know how much that puts your panties in a twist.
personal experience with defending your faith life isn't self evident genetic time alive in plain sight daily here even though you only exist by heartbeats since conception.
I don't answer to your fictions.Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ As usual you have huffed, and puffed, but posted nothing to dispute him. If it was a slam dunk there would be NO negotiating. They would have immediately refiled.
DUde, you ain't a lawyer, not smart enough to be one. You are a mediocre finance guy that couldn't cut it on the street.
Why?If it was a slam dunk there would be NO negotiating. They would have immediately refiled.
You always squeal that as I'm hammering shut another one.DUde, you ain't a lawyer, not smart enough to be one
Your fractional definition of facts to how life could happen intellectually over genetic outcomes since your conception is relative to people sacrificing their bio-logical time existed after date of birth one at a time in plain sight daily here.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ I don't answer to your fictions.
Why?
They have him nailed.
As I told you from the beginning.
You always squeal that as I'm hammering shut another one.
And I do it consistently.
It's probably why my most recent conference with a prosecutor ended with him suggesting I should have been a lawyer....
But what would he know.
If they had him nailed the would have already been in court, retard.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑I don't answer to your fictions.Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ As usual you have huffed, and puffed, but posted nothing to dispute him. If it was a slam dunk there would be NO negotiating. They would have immediately refiled.
DUde, you ain't a lawyer, not smart enough to be one. You are a mediocre finance guy that couldn't cut it on the street.Why?If it was a slam dunk there would be NO negotiating. They would have immediately refiled.
They have him nailed.
As I told you from the beginning.You always squeal that as I'm hammering shut another one.DUde, you ain't a lawyer, not smart enough to be one
And I do it consistently.
It's probably why my most recent conference with a prosecutor ended with him suggesting I should have been a lawyer....
But what would he know.
I don't answer to your fictions.It's probably why my most recent conference with a prosecutor ended with him suggesting I should have been a lawyer....
But what would he know.
Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑ I gave him 5 greenies for that post. I know how much that puts your panties in a twist.
Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ If they had him nailed the would have already been in court, retard.
I don't answer to your fictions.
And WTF? You seem to spend a lot of time whining to the law. WTF is wrong with you?
You're wrong, but explain why you believe that.If they had him nailed the would have already been in court, retard
"whining"?And WTF? You seem to spend a lot of time whining to the law. WTF is wrong with you?
Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ I don't answer to your fictions.
Why?
They have him nailed.
As I told you from the beginning.
You always squeal that as I'm hammering shut another one.
And I do it consistently.
It's probably why my most recent conference with a prosecutor ended with him suggesting I should have been a lawyer....
But what would he know.
He has no incentive to.Beekeeper » 12 Sep 2026, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ IF I am such an "idiot". then YOU EXPLAIN WHY THE AG didn't just refile charges IMMEDIATELY
Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ He has no incentive to.
Rosen has played all his cards...he knows that the gardener will plead the 5th, because the alternative is confessing, under oath, to a multiple fraud count..
The state doesn't need to incur the expense of another prosecution. Rosen wants to avoid being classed a felon.