Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 1:55 pm

Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 1:43 pm

That is not it either.  This game not this hard.  And it is not about me. Or you.  It is now about when the second trial starts.  Let me now when it does, Puss.

No...it's about the ongoing prosecution and why the State hasn't taken it to trial. 

And, as always, your lying and cowardice. 

 

Nope, that is not the answer, Puss.

You really are in a sever meltdown.


 

Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm

Nope, that is not the answer, Puss.

You really are in a sever meltdown.

You're on a dead run...

Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm

Nope, that is not the answer, Puss.

You really are in a sever meltdown.

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia — A former CIA official found with $40 million of gold bars in his home has reached a tentative plea agreement after being charged with theft for fraudulently inflating his salary, according to court records. 

A federal judge on Friday extended a deadline to formally indict defendant David J. Rush until Oct. 8, giving time for federal prosecutors and his attorney to finalize the plea deal and avoid a public trial that the parties said could involve significant litigation over classified material

Former CIA official found with gold bars reaches tentative plea deal after charge of salary theft | KSL.com

https://share.google/54M61QqJLlnwD3iAn
 
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 6:21 am

Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 2:42 pm

Nope, that is not the answer, Puss.

You really are in a sever meltdown.

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia — A former CIA official found with $40 million of gold bars in his home has reached a tentative plea agreement after being charged with theft for fraudulently inflating his salary, according to court records. 

A federal judge on Friday extended a deadline to formally indict defendant David J. Rush until Oct. 8, giving time for federal prosecutors and his attorney to finalize the plea deal and avoid a public trial that the parties said could involve significant litigation over classified material

Former CIA official found with gold bars reaches tentative plea deal after charge of salary theft | KSL.com

https://share.google/54M61QqJLlnwD3iAn
 
 

 

That is also not the answer.  

No thoughts, no narrative, nothing.

Huey » 13 Sep 2026, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 7:45 am

That is also not the answer.  

No thoughts, no narrative, nothing.

You're an imbecile.

Why aren't they rushing him to trial?

Your theory..

Beekeeper » 12 Sep 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 11:08 am

Yep!!

@Blackvegetable  is doing his usual PANTY DANCING to make himself believe he isn't getting his bloody STUMP of a leg shoved up his ***!!

EVERYONE can see otherwise and NO ONE is coming to his rescue save his *** either!!     

he ain’t called “clinger” for nothing…
 

Huey » 12 Sep 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2026, 9:05 am

He claims to have had success representing himself in backwoods courts against local judges.  Probably elected and not that good.  One case a witness did not show up, and another was a civil matter of little consequence where lawyers were probably not needed.  HOA ****.  Can't remember the third.  And he won't say what this case he is ranting about  is about.

he loves to talk the talk while sitting in a wheelchair…

ROG62 » 13 Sep 2026, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 10:21 am

he ain’t called “clinger” for nothing…

     

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 7:47 am

You're an imbecile.

Why aren't they rushing him to trial?

Your theory..

YOU said it was a SLAM DUNK!!

So why aren't they RUSHING HIM TO TRIAL?? Oh, that's right, the "cost" of a trial.

You're a **** IDIOT, ****!!

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm

The guy whom Grifty has selected to further address the issues he has created with "the Pool" is a white Republican from NH.

He was caught during a 2017 ballot audit doubtlessly motivated by MAGAt demands for Federal interference in state functions. Though he would be flagged for having done so numerous times, he was convicted in NH on one instance..

The conviction was reversed on a procedural issue and remanded back to the Grafton Superior Court for further proceedings.

Though the grounds for reversal were quite narrow, reflexive MAGAt imbeciles and other toadies are touting it as a declaration of innocence....even though the case was remanded and the perp is currently in negotiations with the state's AG.

To any non idiot, the fact of the duplicate ballots should be sufficient to raise serious questions about innocence....

But that's before getting into the weeds of the facts...

Once you read them, you will get a measure of the reflexive stupidy of both the perp and his champions. 

https://www.masslive.com/news/2022/12/r ... tolen.html

Reflexive self-righteousness is way worse.
Stupidity just exists on its own...
Self-righteousness is intentional, ergo has a motive like virtue signaling for example.
Liberals/progs drip self-righteousness like a Golden Corral Chocolate Fountain. yuk.

Discuss . . . in your own words. You're doing good so far.

Beekeeper » 13 Sep 2026, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 5:48 pm

YOU said it was a SLAM DUNK!!

So why aren't they RUSHING HIM TO TRIAL?? Oh, that's right, the "cost" of a trial.

You're a **** IDIOT, ****!!

Because they don't need to..

It is cheaper to mediate..
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 6:51 pm

Because they don't need to..

It is cheaper to mediate..

They've been "mediating" for 4+ years, *******!!

NO TRIAL and NOT a word about where they stand!!!

NOW you need to EXPLAIN ALL THAT **** you have been digging out of your ***!! 

NO DA, AG, or anyone with the ability to RETRY THIS CASE would let it drag on for 4+ years without SOMETHING happening you dumb **** MORON!!!

YOU said it was a "SLAM DUNK"!!! So why no refiling of the charges??

Oh, that's right, BECAUSE THERE IS EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that the DA/AG can't overcome!! 

It must REALLY SUCK for you having to walk around with that BLOODY LEG STUMP SHOVED UP YOUR *** THAT I PUT THERE!!

           
 

Beekeeper » 13 Sep 2026, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 7:24 pm

They've been "mediating" for 4+ years, *******!!

You're a **** cretin


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm

The guy whom Grifty has selected to further address the issues he has created with "the Pool" is a white Republican from NH.

He was caught during a 2017 ballot audit doubtlessly motivated by MAGAt demands for Federal interference in state functions. Though he would be flagged for having done so numerous times, he was convicted in NH on one instance..

The conviction was reversed on a procedural issue and remanded back to the Grafton Superior Court for further proceedings.

Though the grounds for reversal were quite narrow, reflexive MAGAt imbeciles and other toadies are touting it as a declaration of innocence....even though the case was remanded and the perp is currently in negotiations with the state's AG.

To any non idiot, the fact of the duplicate ballots should be sufficient to raise serious questions about innocence....

But that's before getting into the weeds of the facts...

Once you read them, you will get a measure of the reflexive stupidy of both the perp and his champions. 

https://www.masslive.com/news/2022/12/r ... tolen.html

I take the man at his word. His identity was stolen. And here's the twist: It was stolen BY HIM. 

So he's innocent of double voting. He's guilty of identity theft. But he insists he has the right to drop the charges against himself - and I'm afraid that he is correct.

I don't like it any better than you do. But the man's strategy is Sun Tsu level. I honestly cannot see a way to punish him. And I have been practicing law for more than three decades. 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 8:01 pm

You're a **** cretin

I looked up the case. A guy named Butholio admitted that he was the one who done it, and they did not allow the jury to hear that. 

You've got a CONFESSION TO POLICE by the real perp. And you're still after this guy, who is both legally blind and jewish, making you an anti-semite AND a gimp-bully.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Sep 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2026, 12:26 pm

Because he is in mediation talks with the AG...

Is he, though?

Do you have a link to back that claim?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 8:01 pm

You're a **** cretin

So??

AS STATED, this has been ONGOING for YEARS and still NO REFILING OF THE CHARGERS, ****!!

Oh, and there is this you leave out because it SHOVES THAT BLOODY STUMP so far up your *** you will never get it out!!

"The State also moved to preclude evidence relating to William Botelho, an acquaintance of the defendant who had previously worked at the defendant’s Belmont property. During multiple interviews, Botelho had admitted to voting in the defendant’s name in Belmont during prior elections. The State posited that the defendant intended to use Botelho’s statements to assert an alibi defense for which the defendant had failed to provide notice. The defendant disputed the State’s characterization of Botelho’s statements as alibi evidence and, instead, asserted that Botelho’s statements constituted evidence of an alternative perpetrator. The defendant further contended that Botelho’s statements were admissible and requested a Richards hearing to address Fifth Amendment issues relating to Botelho’s potential testimony. The State responded that even if Botelho’s statements constituted alternative perpetrator evidence, the defendant had failed to provide notice of his intent to admit New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b) prior bad acts evidence."

ADD TO THIS, the State's EVIDENCE to "convict" was BAD in that Mass of Two **** does NOT REQUIRE any ID to vote or to even get a BALLOT, ****!!

"Even if the evidence was relevant for non-propensity purposes, its probative value was low. The fact that Massachusetts does not requirein-personvoters to present photo identification when voting diminishes the probative value of this evidence regarding the defendant’s identity. See State v. Smith, 125 N.H. 522, 525 (1984)(“Evidence of prior acts offered to show that no mistake has been made regarding the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the charged crime is only relevant if the prior acts were acts of the defendant.”). In addition, the evidence carried little incremental probative value in light of other direct evidence that the defendant was registered to vote in both Massachusetts and New Hampshire, filled out an absentee ballot in Holderness on November 3, 2016, and was checked off on the voter checklist in Belmont on November 8, 2016. We thus agree with the defendant thatevidence pertaining to prior elections “was cumulative and added little probative value.” "

So, you see, all your **** HATE for the SAVE Act would it have been LAW, would have TOTALLY prevented ANYONE other than the ACTUAL PERSON ON THE VOTER ROLLS from casting a ballot!! Which is what WE HAVE BEEN DEMANDING FOR DECADES!! NONE of this would have happened and NO ONE would be fighting this **** since the FACTS WOULD BE THERE AND INDISPUTABLE ONES AT THAT!!

Now, run along, **** and take this *** KICKING LIKE THE DOUCHE **** YOU ARE!!   
 

Beekeeper » 14 Sep 2026, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2026, 5:49 am

So??

 

How many years since the appeal was decided?

Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2026, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 9:21 pm

I looked up the case. A guy named Butholio admitted that he was the one who done it, and they did not allow the jury to hear that. 

You've got a CONFESSION TO POLICE by the real perp. And you're still after this guy, who is both legally blind and jewish, making you an anti-semite AND a gimp-bully.

A fair cop.



 

Blackvegetable » 14 Sep 2026, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2026, 5:52 am

A fair cop.

Cop-out.....from the Minister of Minutia.