No more retelling.Huey » 08 Sep 2026, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember, Anonymous Keyboard Komando, you used to brag about being a badass.
#76 Re: Because They're Morons...Share Post 11 Aug 2026, 3:15 pmBlackvegetable
And totally badass.....the complete package....why chicks dig me and bass fear me....Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Aug 2026, 3:11 pm
A rich white boy who grew up in titled families in sweden, then lived with his father who was rich,

My Badassery is so routine that I don't consider being ambushed with pepper spray a "street fight".*Huey » 30 Dec 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑I get it. You are now denying that for years you claimed you never had an adult street fight. Got it.
He is not eligible ya moron.Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why you must NEVER retell.
This has nothing to do with his license eligibility.
You are assuming he lying. I don't know if he is lying or not. He could be. And then again, he may not be. You presume to know he is lying.Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ As of 2020, he was listed as "eligible"..
You presume to know when he qualified as "legally blind"
Tiny,Huey » 08 Sep 2026, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You are assuming he lying. I don't know if he is lying or not. He could be. And then again, he may not be. You presume to know he is lying.
I am not saying he was lying or wasn't. You claim to stick to facts. You don't have a fact on this.
No you didn't.Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
I'm posting the reported facts, verbatim.
You are speculating.
I have already posted that TWICE.Huey » 08 Sep 2026, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ No you didn't.
You are using the 2022 article.
You did not report specifically why the conviction was overturned.
Huey » 08 Sep 2026, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ No you didn't.
You are using the 2022 article.
You did not report specifically why the conviction was overturned.
It is a fact that Rosen says he is legally blind.
Remember, puke, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.
You only report facts that support your ****.
Remember, puke, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.
It is very relevant when discussing the trial is to discuss the FACT that the judge did not allow the jury to see or hear the confession of the gardener. Which was the basis for the NH Supreme Court overturning the conviction.Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I have already posted that TWICE.
It is not relevant to the facts at trial.
You would have to ask your mother why you are here.
Tiny,Huey » 08 Sep 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You would have to ask your mother why you are here.
verbatim
/vərˈbādəm/
Verbatim means word for word, using the exact same words as the original source without changing anything. It does not mean "in context"
verbatim
/vərˈbādəm/
No, verbatim does not mean "in full"—it means word for word, or using the exact same words as the original. [1]
Key Differences
- Verbatim focuses on accuracy, meaning the text or speech is copied or repeated without changing a single word.
- In full means complete or entire, referring to the whole length of a text or recording without leaving anything out
You could ask your wife...oh, I forgot, she found out and left.
THIS is what happens when STATES automatically MAIL OUT BALLOTS that were NOT requested by voters!!Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy whom Grifty has selected to further address the issues he has created with "the Pool" is a white Republican from NH.
He was caught during a 2017 ballot audit doubtlessly motivated by MAGAt demands for Federal interference in state functions. Though he would be flagged for having done so numerous times, he was convicted in NH on one instance..
The conviction was reversed on a procedural issue and remanded back to the Grafton Superior Court for further proceedings.
Though the grounds for reversal were quite narrow, reflexive MAGAt imbeciles and other toadies are touting it as a declaration of innocence....even though the case was remanded and the perp is currently in negotiations with the state's AG.
To any non idiot, the fact of the duplicate ballots should be sufficient to raise serious questions about innocence....
But that's before getting into the weeds of the facts...
Once you read them, you will get a measure of the reflexive stupidy of both the perp and his champions.
https://www.masslive.com/news/2022/12/r ... tolen.html
RebelGator » 08 Sep 2026, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You could ask your wife...oh, I forgot, she found out and left.
He requested it, **** *******.Beekeeper » 08 Sep 2026, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ THIS is what happens when STATES automatically MAIL OUT BALLOTS that were NOT requested by voters!!
!
Hey Dickhead....Blackvegetable » 08 Sep 2026, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy whom Grifty has selected to further address the issues he has created with "the Pool" is a white Republican from NH.
He was caught during a 2017 ballot audit doubtlessly motivated by MAGAt demands for Federal interference in state functions. Though he would be flagged for having done so numerous times, he was convicted in NH on one instance..
The conviction was reversed on a procedural issue and remanded back to the Grafton Superior Court for further proceedings.
Though the grounds for reversal were quite narrow, reflexive MAGAt imbeciles and other toadies are touting it as a declaration of innocence....even though the case was remanded and the perp is currently in negotiations with the state's AG.
To any non idiot, the fact of the duplicate ballots should be sufficient to raise serious questions about innocence....
But that's before getting into the weeds of the facts...
Once you read them, you will get a measure of the reflexive stupidy of both the perp and his champions.
https://www.masslive.com/news/2022/12/r ... tolen.html

PROVE IT!!!
Although Rosen admitted that he voted absentee in New Hampshire, he further stated he had no recollection of voting in person in Belmont.Beekeeper » 08 Sep 2026, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ PROVE IT!!!
Because that's what the PERSECUTION has to do!!
Oops!!
167...Because that's what the PERSECUTION has to do!!
Our child is a chemical engineer, fluent in 3 languages.RebelGator » 08 Sep 2026, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You could ask your wife...oh, I forgot, she found out and left.