No more retelling.Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Remember, Anonymous Keyboard Komando, you used to brag about being a badass.
#76 Re: Because They're Morons...Share Post 11 Aug 2026, 3:15 pmBlackvegetable
And totally badass.....the complete package....why chicks dig me and bass fear me....Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Aug 2026, 3:11 pm
A rich white boy who grew up in titled families in sweden, then lived with his father who was rich,

My Badassery is so routine that I don't consider being ambushed with pepper spray a "street fight".*Huey » 30 Dec 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑I get it. You are now denying that for years you claimed you never had an adult street fight. Got it.
He is not eligible ya moron.Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is why you must NEVER retell.
This has nothing to do with his license eligibility.
You are assuming he lying. I don't know if he is lying or not. He could be. And then again, he may not be. You presume to know he is lying.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ As of 2020, he was listed as "eligible"..
You presume to know when he qualified as "legally blind"
Tiny,Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You are assuming he lying. I don't know if he is lying or not. He could be. And then again, he may not be. You presume to know he is lying.
I am not saying he was lying or wasn't. You claim to stick to facts. You don't have a fact on this.
No you didn't.Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
I'm posting the reported facts, verbatim.
You are speculating.
I have already posted that TWICE.Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No you didn't.
You are using the 2022 article.
You did not report specifically why the conviction was overturned.
Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No you didn't.
You are using the 2022 article.
You did not report specifically why the conviction was overturned.
It is a fact that Rosen says he is legally blind.
Remember, puke, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.
You only report facts that support your ****.
Remember, puke, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.
It is very relevant when discussing the trial is to discuss the FACT that the judge did not allow the jury to see or hear the confession of the gardener. Which was the basis for the NH Supreme Court overturning the conviction.Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have already posted that TWICE.
It is not relevant to the facts at trial.
You would have to ask your mother why you are here.