This is about whether or not the citations (plural) I posted are corrected in their description of the PDB.
He won't. But I love watching while he turns himself into a pretzel. The one thing you have to do is not fall for his many attempts to reframe from the original disagreement. He is doing it right now with his Condi Rice diversion.
Here we go.Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He won't. But I love watching while he turns himself into a pretzel. The one thing you have to do is not fall for his many attempts to reframe from the original disagreement. He is doing it right now with his Condi Rice diversion.
****. You said that what I posted was slop. It was not. It is accurate. So post these facts that show my two citations are not accurate. You know they are so you are reframing.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't.
It's about the facts of the Scrub Administration's catastrophic failure...
And, to a lesser extent, the toxic combination of AI and Stupid.
Umm, where are these facts that dispute what my citations said about the PDB? Here we go with the BV Bitch Bait and Switch.
It's slop.Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ****. You said that what I posted was slop. It was not. It is accurate. So post these facts that show my two citations are not accurate. You know they are so you are reframing.
This is about whether or not the citations (plural) I posted are corrected in their description of the PDB.
So where are these facts that show them wrong?
I posted the definition of AI slop. It's not. And the NBC source says the same thing. AND I posted the PDB.Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It's slop.
AI can't parse information on the basis of its quality, it does so stochastically.
You criticized the objective evidence...
Umm, where are these facts that dispute what my citations said about the PDB? Here we go with the BV Bitch Bait and Switch.Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ You criticized the objective evidence...
Now you will have to stipulate to a relevant objective fact.
Who was NSA on 9/11?
This is about you acknowledging objective facts...
No, this is about YOU backing up your assertion that my sources are not accurate. You are losing big time, my Bitch.Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is about you acknowledging objective facts...
Your consistent refusal to do so is a monument to your cowardice.
This is not about your reliance on AI slop or even why it is slop.
Just as a reminder to the gutless wonder, this is what the disagreement is about. Let the curbstomping commence.Blackvegetable » Today, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
You posted some AI slop.
I posted a fact...
There are far too many others....with which you are unfamiliar...
This will mean that you will reach for more AI slop.
So it will become a matter of me having to curbstomp a bunch of AI slop.
I said you left **** out. ANd then proved it. You said my source was slop. NBC not slop, is it?Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is not about your reliance on AI slop or even why it is slop.
It is about you challenging my statement that Scrub **** up.
Now that you see Rice contradicting the evidence and herself, you want to divert to another debate in you aren't equipped to participate.
Stop lying, ReframeyHuey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Just as a reminder to the gutless wonder, this is what the disagreement is about. Let the curbstomping commence.
Remember, ******, I posted TWO sources and the PDB. YOU? Nothing. Hell, I don't even ask you questions and I kicked your ***.
Yes.Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I said you left **** out. ANd then proved it. You said my source was slop. NBC not slop, is it?
Divert to another debate? Bitch, you are one **** up pedophile.
Stop being obtuse. I agreed that he got a PDB named “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”