Post these words...of mineI stopped THIRTY THREE miles from you. Now lie about your own words.
Explain why you can't stop 42 miles short AND never come closer than 33 miles.Huey » 14 Sep 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ Not according to your words, Lying ******:
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Physical ******, you were told you could meet any day that week in Boston around the stadium or further north.Blackvegetable » 14 Sep 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑Explain why you can't stop 42 miles short AND never come closer than 33 miles.Huey » 14 Sep 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ Not according to your words, Lying ******:
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
It's not about me...
No, its not. If you don't edit the post.
Huey » 14 Sep 2026, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑Physical ******, you were told you could meet any day that week in Boston around the stadium or further north.Blackvegetable » 14 Sep 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑Explain why you can't stop 42 miles short AND never come closer than 33 miles.Huey » 14 Sep 2026, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ Not according to your words, Lying ******:
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
I **** own you, ******.
It is about you failing to make a case you are incapable of making.
Your mom's a hor.JohnnyYou » 14 Sep 2026, 4:31 am » wrote: ↑ All sports should be exclusively transgender..
What a women is..
MAGAts concerns are directed from more pertinent issues.
But it's all they got for the likes of Talarico..
Everyone is a prostitute..
Corbett’s instincts were justified. The Times’ story was a bad misfire—one that resulted in the paper’s first defamation trial loss in a United States court in more than fifty years. When the trial ended last month, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, a jury awarded 9.25 million dollars to a former University of Alabama basketball player named Kai Spears, because the Times had mistakenly placed him as a passenger in a car that was at the scene of a tragic shooting death.Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 13 Sep 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.
Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs. It is incredible. And Mary, I not saying you go to that forum, moron. I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.This is gonna be choice...You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.Given your lack of integrity, how might we confirm this?Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.
It is incredible.
To someone who gets everything they think they know from The Five.LikeI not saying you go to that forum, moron. I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.
NYT
WaPo
Bloomberg
Daily Beast
ABC
?
Yes...there is a relatively finite, and fixed, number of sources...but still a healthy number and variety.
You immerse yourself in a universe of 2....linked at the hip....recatapulting the same ****, in easily digestible slogany things.
Which is why you refuse to acknowledge Objective Facts.
Point being?Huey » 16 Sep 2026, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Corbett’s instincts were justified. The Times’ story was a bad misfire—one that resulted in the paper’s first defamation trial loss in a United States court in more than fifty years. When the trial ended last month, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, a jury awarded 9.25 million dollars to a former University of Alabama basketball player named Kai Spears, because the Times had mistakenly placed him as a passenger in a car that was at the scene of a tragic shooting death.
https://www.cjr.org/news/how-the-new-yo ... spears.php
The award was reduced but they still lost.
If I have to hold your hand thru this **** you are definitely not smart enough to be posting here.
Yeah, but your mom is such a skank hor thst she doesn't even merit a w at the front, or an e on the end.
Right...
No problem. The point is even your sources get sued and lose defamation lawsuits,Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Right...
You do this **** all the time, retard. At some point you would think that one who us as smart you brag you are would become a little more clearer
And you consider this comparable to lying about the outcome of an election FOX was the first to call.Huey » 16 Sep 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ No problem. The point is even your sources get sued and lose defamation lawsuits,
Acknowledge you were answer and you will do so the next you are asked for you point.
That is not an acknowledgement, , spoiled bitch. Remember this the next time you demand something, bitch.Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ And you consider this comparable to lying about the outcome of an election FOX was the first to call.
Answer the question, PussPuss.Huey » 17 Sep 2026, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ That is not an acknowledgement, , spoiled bitch. Remember this the next time you demand something, bitch.
oh, you won’t do ****.
you're 145 lbs of frail.oh, you won’t do ****.
OK lawnmower genius
You have an acknowledgement to make first.Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2026, 5:22 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question, PussPuss.
you're 145 lbs of frail.