Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

FIFY.  And stop with the gibberish, Senior Citizen.

You insist I have "masters".

You can't name any.

So you insist I do.

Now you go on about a forum I haven't visited in years...

Go wax that yeast riddled snatch of yours, Coward...
 

 

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  It is incredible. And Mary, I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.
 

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  It is incredible. And Mary, I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

This is gonna be choice... 

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  

 Given your lack of integrity, how might we confirm this?

 

It is incredible.

To someone who gets everything they think they know from The Five.

 I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

Like

NYT

WaPo

Bloomberg 

Daily Beast

ABC

?


Yes...there is a relatively finite, and fixed, number of sources...but still a healthy number and variety.

You immerse yourself in a universe of 2....linked at the hip....recatapulting the same ****, in easily digestible slogany things.

Which is why you refuse to acknowledge Objective Facts.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  It is incredible. And Mary, I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

This is gonna be choice... 

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  

 Given your lack of integrity, how might we confirm this?

It is incredible.

To someone who gets everything they think they know from The Five.

 I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

Like

NYT

WaPo

Bloomberg 

Daily Beast

ABC

?


Yes...there is a relatively finite, and fixed, number of sources...but still a healthy number and variety.

You immerse yourself in a universe of 2....linked at the hip....recatapulting the same ****, in easily digestible slogany things.

Which is why you refuse to acknowledge Objective Facts.
 

 

****, you got embarrassed with the Daily Beast the other day.

You immerse yourself in a universe of 2....linked at the hip....recatapulting the same ****, in easily digestible slogany things.

Why do you feel the need to lie so much?  My sources have been posted for years.  Next, I don't watch those two particular shows for news.  One comes on at 5, and I already have formed an opinion of the news.  The other is from the night before. 

But, I have told you this before.  You can't handle the truth so you lie.  Is the another reason your ex ran as faraway from you as she could?

 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

****, you got embarrassed with the Daily Beast the other day.

Why do you feel the need to lie so much?  My sources have been posted for years.  Next, I don't watch those two particular shows for news.  One comes on at 5, and I already have formed an opinion of the news.  The other is from the night before. 

But, I have told you this before.  You can't handle the truth so you lie.  Is the another reason your ex ran as faraway from you as she could?

****, you got embarrassed with the Daily Beast the other day.

Exclusively in your retelling. 

Why do you feel the need to lie so much?  

There's reason why you can never post these lies...

It is because you are lying.

My sources have been posted for years.

why do you persist in pretending?

List your sources by the amount of time you spend with them each week..

 

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

****, you got embarrassed with the Daily Beast the other day.

Why do you feel the need to lie so much?  My sources have been posted for years.  Next, I don't watch those two particular shows for news.  One comes on at 5, and I already have formed an opinion of the news.  The other is from the night before. 

But, I have told you this before.  You can't handle the truth so you lie.  Is the another reason your ex ran as faraway from you as she could?

****, you got embarrassed with the Daily Beast the other day.

Exclusively in your retelling. 

Why do you feel the need to lie so much?  

There's reason why you can never post these lies...

It is because you are lying.

My sources have been posted for years.

why do you persist in pretending?

List your sources by the amount of time you spend with them each week..

 


 

 

Exclusively in your retelling. 

Umm, perhaps you can explain why the had to correct this part of the story:

From this:

chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud

To this:

whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud

Huey » Today, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:18 am

Umm, perhaps you can explain why the had to correct this part of the story:

From this:

chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud

To this:

whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud

Because both statements are true...



 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:18 am

Umm, perhaps you can explain why the had to correct this part of the story:

From this:

chief executive is being prosecuted for election fraud

To this:

whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud

Because both statements are true...



 

 

  You're a **** idiot.

Huey » Today, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:46 pm

  You're a **** idiot.

Which statement is false, and why?

Blackvegetable » Today, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:26 pm

Huey » Today, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:46 pm

  You're a **** idiot.

Which statement is false, and why?

 

Questions, Askholie?  Seriously.  The first one because there is no prosecution occurring as we speak.  Hence the **** corrector, ******.
Be back tomorrow

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:18 am

No...

 

Of course you don’t, ****…

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:32 am

You insist I have "masters".

You can't name any.

So you insist I do.

Now you go on about a forum I haven't visited in years...

Go wax that yeast riddled snatch of yours, Coward...

It’s a turnip…called master vegetable…

Huey » Today, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:27 pm

Questions, Askholie?  Seriously.  The first one because there is no prosecution occurring as we speak.  Hence the **** corrector, ******.
Be back tomorrow

The first one because there is no prosecution occurring as we speak.

of course there is, you dumb ****...

It is why he is talking to the AG..

This remains true whether or not you can be made to understand it.