Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Answer the question first..
It will eliminate the need for me to do so...
Huey avatar Huey 0 3 minutes agoBlackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Answer the question first..
It will eliminate the need for me to do so...
Do what?
Prorve me wrong without your theatrical **** of asking questions. Ooops, I answered another queston.
Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Prorve me wrong without your theatrical **** of asking questions. Ooops, I answered another queston.
Right now take the L. You bringing facts does not oblige me to answer your questions. asshole.
so I have an obligation, and I must discharge it your way...Prorve me wrong without your theatrical **** of asking questions
What obliges me to prove you wrong?You bringing facts does not oblige me to answer your questions. asshole.
Nothing. But you can't declare victory if you don't. Take your L and move on.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ so I have an obligation, and I must discharge it your way...
What obliges me to prove you wrong?
I can declare victory on the same basis as you.Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nothing. But you can't declare victory if you don't. Take your L and move on.
Oh, acknowledge you were answered. Again.
Take your L. It is up to you to disprove what I posted the other day about the poverty level.Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I can declare victory on the same basis as you.
You're full of demands...
Answer the question, lying little coward.
PS. Is this the question you are whining about, Mary?Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In the interest of full disclosure...
On roughly how many matters legal have your insights proven useful?
No...it was quite specific.BuckNaked » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ yea because you asked a vague question that requires more info to answer
You asked me to predict the outcome of a case without offering any detail....you asked a vague question that requires more info to answer
Post this "whine"...
I don't have to do anything like it.Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Take your L. It is up to you to disprove what I posted the other day about the poverty level.
See ya tomorrow, Mary.
No I don’tBlackvegetable » Today, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it was quite specific.
And you know damned well to what I am referring.
You asked me to predict the outcome of a case without offering any detail....
So is the reference text..
Why what?
the **** it is, **** ****** sidestepper….Blackvegetable » Today, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ It is now, **** ******...
But you keep on doing what you always do.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom once again the spoiled little bitch refuses to clarify. If you refuse too just **** off, bitch.
Run bitch, runBlackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑I don't have to do anything like it.Huey » Yesterday, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Take your L. It is up to you to disprove what I posted the other day about the poverty level.
See ya tomorrow, Mary.
You have to acknowledge that you are CONSISTENTLY wrong on matters of the law.