Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
GAS prices dissected…
GAS prices dissected…
By ROG62
18 Sep 2026 9:02 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Yesterday 6:35 pm
Blackvegetable » Today, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ For the sake of simplicity, call it the difference between cost at the wellhead plus the cost of refining and the wholesale price of gasoline....
The only reason your answer sucks is because it took so **** long to pry anything out of you.
Don't you try to use the word "brevity" as an insult? ****, man.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Yesterday 7:19 pm
It is about your pique, after all...DeezerShoove » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The only reason your answer sucks is because it took so **** long to pry anything out of you.
Don't you try to use the word "brevity" as an insult? ****, man.
I do so in a particular context, Slizzy...Don't you try to use the word "brevity" as an insult? ****, man.
Yesterday 7:43 pm
don’t quote me on this, Saddle Seat and Western Pleasure …she rides Saddlebreds…
member of 2 saddle clubs…
competes March thru November
annual Champ Show next week…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Yesterday 8:13 pm
Blackvegetable » 54 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is about your pique, after all...
I do so in a particular context, Slizzy...
Is that non-word fascinating to you?
Must be because I have no idea what it is supposed to mean.
Good luck trying to "get at me".
Maybe someday you'll seem less infantile to me.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Today 5:38 am
Post the rules and stop going on like a little bitchie....DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that non-word fascinating to you?
Must be because I have no idea what it is supposed to mean.
Good luck trying to "get at me".
Maybe someday you'll seem less infantile to me.
Today 7:59 am
I had to look that up. Very cool and lucky you, all those little vacations!ROG62 » Yesterday, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑ don’t quote me on this, Saddle Seat and Western Pleasure …she rides Saddlebreds…
member of 2 saddle clubs…
competes March thru November, then I pull the plug..
annual Champ Show next week…
A Saddlebred (specifically the American Saddlebred) is an iconic, graceful breed of horse from the United States known for its smooth ride, high-stepping movement, and high head carriage.
Key CharacteristicsAppearance:
Elegant and well-proportioned, with a long, arched neck and a proud, upright head.
Gaits:
Famous for traditional gaits (walk, trot, and canter) as well as unique, smooth-riding ambling gaits called the "slow gait" and the "rack".
Temperament:
Intelligent, energetic, and people-oriented
Today 8:21 am
yes, it’s all “win, win”…Fuelman » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I had to look that up. Very cool and lucky you, all those little vacations!
A Saddlebred (specifically the American Saddlebred) is an iconic, graceful breed of horse from the United States known for its smooth ride, high-stepping movement, and high head carriage.
Key CharacteristicsAppearance:
Elegant and well-proportioned, with a long, arched neck and a proud, upright head.
Gaits:
Famous for traditional gaits (walk, trot, and canter) as well as unique, smooth-riding ambling gaits called the "slow gait" and the "rack".
Temperament:
Intelligent, energetic, and people-oriented
watching the homestead is a small price to pay while she’s gone…she loves the breed, tall, sleek and animated…everything a quarter horse is not…
@ 5’3” , the woman who screams around mice and snakes, yet has no problem putting a 16-17 hand 1200# horse in its place…
it’s all beyond me…but then, that’s a 2-way street…lol…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Today 8:31 am
don’t forget, brown “reads things”, therefore “knows things” claims his vocabulary is “3x” the national average…DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that non-word fascinating to you?
Must be because I have no idea what it is supposed to mean.
Good luck trying to "get at me".
Maybe someday you'll seem less infantile to me.
then there’s this…
Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.
another non word…*insert eyeroll*Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑Get the **** out of here with that ponce...Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court is once again under attack from those calling for packing, or even eliminating, the institution as hopelessly ideological and divided.
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
This is for an audience of *******.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
Today 8:39 am
Is @Blackvegetable misusing words again? What a ponce!ROG62 » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑don’t forget, brown “reads things”, therefore “knows things” claims his vocabulary is “3x” the national average…DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that non-word fascinating to you?
Must be because I have no idea what it is supposed to mean.
Good luck trying to "get at me".
Maybe someday you'll seem less infantile to me.
then there’s this…Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑There was never any "debacle", except in the retelling...Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ I can't believe he is still using the daily beast after his recent debacle using them.another non word…*insert eyeroll*Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2026, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑Get the **** out of here with that ponce...Huey » 18 Sep 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ The Supreme Court is once again under attack from those calling for packing, or even eliminating, the institution as hopelessly ideological and divided.
The Philadelphia Inquirer recently proclaimed that “The Supreme Court’s conservative majority keeps choosing ideology over impartiality.”
Other media outlets reported “devastating” polling showing the Court as unpopular and losing institutional respect.
It is all clearly alarming — despite being entirely untrue.
Looking at the actual rulings disproves the argument of a “biased” court
The Court ruled unanimously in more than 44% of cases, slightly up from the prior year.
When you add the roughly 11% of opinions that were 8-1 and 6% that were 7-1 or 7-2, the rate of unanimous or nearly unanimous jumps to 62%.
In over 77% of cases, there was no ideological split in the resulting opinions.
While slightly up, the ideological split emphasized in the coverage is found in less than a quarter of the cases.Now look at those supposed ideologically besieged liberal justices.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had the lowest percentage in the majority in the last term.
However, she was still in the majority in 72% of cases.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/s ... -the-time/
This is for an audience of *******.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 8:54 am
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
Today 9:22 am
Which is the "non-word"?ROG62 » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ don’t forget, brown “reads things”, therefore “knows things” claims his vocabulary is “3x” the national average…
then there’s this…
another non word…*insert eyeroll*
Today 9:30 am
No....once again he nails it...
Today 9:31 am
Today 9:32 am
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No....once again he nails it...
You couldn't nail a board to a wall with a nail gun—stop pretending you have the tools to pull off a basic debate.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 9:42 am
:rofl:Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You couldn't nail a board to a wall with a nail gun—stop pretending you have the tools to pull off a basic debate.
debate is not
"Prove me wrong. No questions!"
If you fail to acknowledge objective facts, and contradict them directly, you lose.
Today 9:45 am
You fail to present objective facts. If you post them, I will either debate them or acknowledge them.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You couldn't nail a board to a wall with a nail gun—stop pretending you have the tools to pull off a basic debate.
debate is not
"Prove me wrong. No questions!"
If you fail to acknowledge objective facts, and contradict them directly, you lose.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 9:48 am
I just asked you to acknowledge one I've posted...
Apparently you can't read.
Today 9:48 am
Today 9:51 am
Six Fifty Diesel.. National Average.. Record Breaking today.. AAA...
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
Who is online
In total there are 4899 users online :: 10 registered, 13 bots, and 4876 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, SiteLockSpider, TTD-Content, YandexBot, CriteoBot, proximic, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, ADmantX, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7