It's the RELEVANT part of YOUR data....even if you are much too stupid to understand why...Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Hey, Lil Adolph, I'm not the one asking for the data. You are. I've already given you the tools. Now do the legwork.
Post the word..ROG62 » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ you know which word it is as I posted the definition that was non relatable to your use of it…
oh, and @huey has turned you into roadsmear using it…
Can you demonstrate that you understand what is at issue?
I appreciate the continued interest, but your level of focus on me is becoming somewhat concerning.
You got all the tools you need, Gomer.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It's the RELEVANT part of YOUR data....even if you are much too stupid to understand why...
Now either post it, or admit you have no idea how to figure it out.
And you have all the tools to figure out why your instincts have convinced you to run.....
I am not running. I am patiently sitting tight waiting for you to do some of your own work.Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And you have all the tools to figure out why your instincts have convinced you to run.....
Very much so, Tiny...
I am not running. I'm patiently sitting here waiting for you to do some of your own work. You forgot the third option. I don't give a damn what you want. I made my point, and I posted data and links to support it. If you need evidence for your argument, go get it yourself.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Very much so, Tiny...
Either you are too stupid to make your own data relevant to the question at hand, or you're just too stupid for this activity.
I'm good either way.
This is YOUR "point"....once you quantify this, we're gonna go to work.Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I am not running. I'm patiently sitting here waiting for you to do some of your own work.
My work is done. My point made. You, not so much. We spend EVERY CONTEXT EVERY DAY waiting for you to do your own **** work. Like everyone here.Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ This is YOUR "point"....once you quantify this, we're gonna go to work.
We spend EVERY CONTEXT EVERY DAY chasing you for answers...
You haven't.
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You haven't.
Now answer the question and I will show you how a point is made.
You haven't made ANY point.Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My work is done. My point made. You, not so much. We spend EVERY CONTEXT EVERY DAY waiting for you to do your own **** work. Like everyone here.
Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My work is done. My point made. You, not so much. We spend EVERY CONTEXT EVERY DAY waiting for you to do your own **** work. Like everyone here.
Guess again asshole. That can be found at the AAA link I posted earlier. You got some work to do.Huey » Today, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
THe national avg for diesel is 6.51. CA stupid tax system is to blame for the almost $2 difference.
Oh, I can't see it but I will acknowledge it is correct, Meltdown Mary. So get to work show us all how to make a case.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I posted the diesel price schedule, braindead little twat.
We can't move on because you refuse to acknowledge what it says about the price on Feb, 23, 2026
Go to the original post.....or turn your **** phone...Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh, I can't see it but I will acknowledge it is correct, Meltdown Mary. So get to work show us all how to make a case.
I acknowledge whatever you picture says about that date is true. Now get to **** work.
Ok...I saw the pic. I acknowledge the price. What about it? The national avg was 3.81. The previous week it was 3.71.