Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

it isn't an answer.


Acknowledge that you ran from another question. 

 

It is a fact that they are issuing different numbers.  It is not a fact that they intentionally lied.  Th  at is still in dispute.  Nod that you have been schooled.  

The sixth official put the figure at 23, saying that not all of the undisclosed fatalities were directly linked to the fighting but included American military personnel deployed to the Middle East during the conflict.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:50 pm

Whoooooooooaaaaaaa

Re: The Sounds of Moron....

your lips flapping again?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:04 pm

To some people, that's intelligent..

Like you....and Coozie....and JuCo

TDSFDO…            
 

RebelGator » Yesterday, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:43 pm

Look, no answer.

 

Huey » Today, 5:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:08 am

POS, don’t for one minute think I thought you would answer.  I know you will be a ******, spin, run like a coward and avoid any question that means you have to take a stand on that you can be mocked for.

You are a ****** like that.

because master ******…
 

ROG62 » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:33 am

because master ******…

Share his L..


 

RebelGator » Today, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:09 am

Nuclear tipped ballistic missiles with MIRV capabilities,  launched from the most advanced submarines in the free world, don't have sexual identities.....unless you're characterizing that sound of.... "Oh, **** Me", during Putin's pillow talk, as more than a wet dream.

1. The ability to destroy humanity does not equal the ability to win wars. They END. But there's OBVIOUSLY no winner.
2. Russia has a bigger nukular arsenal that the US - not that it matters. 
3. The US - through its proxy in Coupkraine - has greatly improved Moscow's air defense against those missiles you're wagging-tongue about. 
 
Tell us what the US has to protect anything Russia wants to hit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHNQjTsOAWE

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:50 pm

We have more munitions than we could ever possibly think of using, and are building them up now at levels we have never seen before

Whoooooooooaaaaaaa

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that stupid liberals just like you released one claim after another that Trump had somehow mismanaged the offensive attacks and lost the Iran war because we didn't have any more missiles left?

Do you idiots EVER rely on or let factual evidence determine what comes out of your Trump-hating mouths or is it just a knee-jerk reaction of liberal jerks?
 

Zeets2 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that stupid liberals just like you released one claim after another that Trump had somehow mismanaged the offensive attacks and lost the Iran war because we didn't have any more missiles left?

Do you idiots EVER rely on or let factual evidence determine what comes out of your Trump-hating mouths or is it just a knee-jerk reaction of liberal jerks?
 

 

Remember, this moron supports the fact that someone is leaking the alleged dwindling of stockpiles so our enemies know it.  He wants them to do it.

And that moron also does not understand it is up to leadership to say that we have plenty, whether we do or not. 

Cannonpointer » Today, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:57 pm

1. The ability to destroy humanity does not equal the ability to win wars. They END. But there's OBVIOUSLY no winner.
2. Russia has a bigger nukular arsenal that the US - not that it matters. 
3. The US - through its proxy in Coupkraine - has greatly improved Moscow's air defense against those missiles you're wagging-tongue about. 
 
Tell us what the US has to protect anything Russia wants to hit - including aircraft carriers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHNQjTsOAWE

You are correct, it doesn’t…whether you can destroy the planet 25x or 18x is moot as all it takes is 1x from each side…

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:46 am

Share his L..

#continuestomoanthemoronsound

Zeets2 » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

46 minutes ago

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that stupid liberals just like you released one claim after another that Trump had somehow mismanaged the offensive attacks and lost the Iran war because we didn't have any more missiles left?

Do you idiots EVER rely on or let factual evidence determine what comes out of your Trump-hating mouths or is it just a knee-jerk reaction of liberal jerks?

knowing brown, his source is an unnamed anonymous unsubstantiated TDS sufferer…
 

ROG62 » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

knowing brown, his source is an unnamed anonymous unsubstantiated TDS sufferer…

And there's no doubt it would be found to be just another Trump hater.  Or maybe one of his relatives.

ROG62 » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

#continuestomoanthemoronsound

What does Peg have to say?

Cannonpointer » Today, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:57 pm

1. The ability to destroy humanity does not equal the ability to win wars. They END. But there's OBVIOUSLY no winner.
2. Russia has a bigger nukular arsenal that the US - not that it matters. 
3. The US - through its proxy in Coupkraine - has greatly improved Moscow's air defense against those missiles you're wagging-tongue about. 
 
Tell us what the US has to protect anything Russia wants to hit - including aircraft carriers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHNQjTsOAWE

The U.S. Navy’s Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines (such as the USS Kentucky) remain the deadliest weapons on Earth by sheer volume of destruction. One boat has the capability to destroy the entire Asian Continent. 

Huey » Today, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:03 pm

Remember, this moron supports the fact that someone is leaking the alleged dwindling of stockpiles so our enemies know it.  He wants them to do it.

And that moron also does not understand it is up to leadership to say that we have plenty, whether we do or not.

Absolutely!
And I have no doubt it was leaked by a Trump hater just like him, and they're too dumb to realize how giving away that kind of info hurts the country, which they care nothing about!
 

Zeets2 » Today, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:57 pm

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that stupid liberals just like you released one claim after another that Trump had somehow mismanaged the offensive attacks and lost the Iran war because we didn't have any more missiles left?

Do you idiots EVER rely on or let factual evidence determine what comes out of your Trump-hating mouths or is it just a knee-jerk reaction of liberal jerks?

You believe that ****?




 

Huey » Today, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:03 pm

Remember, this moron supports the fact that someone is leaking the alleged dwindling of stockpiles so our enemies know it.  He wants them to do it.

And that moron also does not understand it is up to leadership to say that we have plenty, whether we do or not.

People can count...

You idiots can't but others don't struggle at all.


If it really was a "national security risk" papers wouldn't print it.
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

People can count...

You idiots can't but others don't struggle at all.


If it really was a "national security risk" papers wouldn't print it.
 

 

In order to count it you have to see it.  

Again, stay away from all things military.  You are a **** moron when it comes to the military.
 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

In order to count it you have to see it.  

Again, stay away from all things military.  You are a **** moron when it comes to the military.
 

 

AI Overview
Yes, revealing that a nation is low on missiles is generally considered a severe national security risk. In the realm of military strategy and geopolitics, broadcasting a critical shortage of ammunition or strategic weapons directly undermines a country's defense capabilities through several key mechanisms:

1. Loss of Deterrence

• Inviting Aggression: Deterrence relies on adversaries believing that an attack will result in a swift, devastating counter-attack. If rivals know a nation lacks the stockpiles to sustain a conflict, the perceived cost of attacking drops significantly, making aggression or invasion much more likely.

• Geopolitical Exploitation: Adversaries may use the window of vulnerability to aggressively pursue territorial claims, cyberattacks, or proxy wars, knowing the depleted nation cannot easily escalate the conflict.

2. Strategic Disadvantage

• Exploiting the Vulnerability: If an adversary knows exactly how many missiles are left, they can calculate how many targets they need to present to fully exhaust the remaining stockpile (a tactic known as "saturation"). Once the defense is empty, the adversary gains uncontested control of the a