Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Ruling from the US Supreme court
Ruling from the US Supreme court
By jerra b
26 Sep 2026 4:12 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Sep 2026 4:12 am
////"So in the several-month period before the August primary election, the Missouri Secretary of State was well aware that conducting the August primary election with the 2025 map carried significant risks. The Secretary nonetheless chose to proceed with the 2025 map for the primary."People Not Politicians shared this statement from Executive Director Richard von Glahn after the SCOTUS ruling Friday: "We are done with corrupt politicians trying to force their map into effect outside the process outlined in the Missouri constitution. We have said from the beginning, people, not politicians will be the final deciders on this DC power grab. We are moving forward to vote NO on Proposition A."////
26 Sep 2026 5:49 am
Exactly what does the Supreme court compare in litigations brought before it? Human rights to mind their chosen social consensus or human liberty to use their own brain to navigate space equally alive now?jerra b » Today, 4:12 am » wrote: ↑ ////"So in the several-month period before the August primary election, the Missouri Secretary of State was well aware that conducting the August primary election with the 2025 map carried significant risks. The Secretary nonetheless chose to proceed with the 2025 map for the primary."People Not Politicians shared this statement from Executive Director Richard von Glahn after the SCOTUS ruling Friday: "We are done with corrupt politicians trying to force their map into effect outside the process outlined in the Missouri constitution. We have said from the beginning, people, not politicians will be the final deciders on this DC power grab. We are moving forward to vote NO on Proposition A."////
A soul's time living born to buried is a separate outcome for each sole added to the species since conception in current events. Both events work in series parallel time displaced now.
26 Sep 2026 8:21 am
Historical Gerrymandering in MissouriGerrymandering in Missouri has a long history, with both major political parties engaging in the practice when they hold power. This manipulation of district boundaries aims to favor one party over another, often leading to significant electoral advantages.Democratic Party Practicesjerrab » Today, 4:12 am » wrote: ↑ ////"So in the several-month period before the August primary election, the Missouri Secretary of State was well aware that conducting the August primary election with the 2025 map carried significant risks. The Secretary nonetheless chose to proceed with the 2025 map for the primary."People Not Politicians shared this statement from Executive Director Richard von Glahn after the SCOTUS ruling Friday: "We are done with corrupt politicians trying to force their map into effect outside the process outlined in the Missouri constitution. We have said from the beginning, people, not politicians will be the final deciders on this DC power grab. We are moving forward to vote NO on Proposition A."////
- Consolidation of Voters: When the Democratic Party has been in control, they have often redrawn district lines to consolidate Democratic voters in specific areas. This strategy aims to create "safe" districts where Democratic candidates have a higher chance of winning.
- Dilution of Influence: In addition to consolidating voters, Democrats have also diluted their influence in other districts. This involves spreading Democratic voters across multiple districts to minimize their overall electoral power.
- Electoral Competition: The practice of gerrymandering has intensified during periods of significant electoral competition in Missouri. Both parties have sought to secure their positions by manipulating district boundaries to ensure favorable outcomes in elections.
- Bipartisan Nature: It is important to note that while the Democratic Party has engaged in gerrymandering, Republicans have similarly employed these tactics when they have been in power. This cyclical nature of gerrymandering reflects the ongoing struggle for political dominance in the state.
“it’s not fair!” 
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
26 Sep 2026 12:20 pm
Sour grapesROG62 » Today, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Historical Gerrymandering in MissouriGerrymandering in Missouri has a long history, with both major political parties engaging in the practice when they hold power. This manipulation of district boundaries aims to favor one party over another, often leading to significant electoral advantages.Democratic Party PracticesHistorical Context
- Consolidation of Voters: When the Democratic Party has been in control, they have often redrawn district lines to consolidate Democratic voters in specific areas. This strategy aims to create "safe" districts where Democratic candidates have a higher chance of winning.
- Dilution of Influence: In addition to consolidating voters, Democrats have also diluted their influence in other districts. This involves spreading Democratic voters across multiple districts to minimize their overall electoral power.
ConclusionOverall, gerrymandering in Missouri has been a tool used by both the Democratic and Republican parties to secure electoral advantages. The historical practices of the Democratic Party illustrate a broader trend of strategic district manipulation that has characterized Missouri's political landscape.
- Electoral Competition: The practice of gerrymandering has intensified during periods of significant electoral competition in Missouri. Both parties have sought to secure their positions by manipulating district boundaries to ensure favorable outcomes in elections.
- Bipartisan Nature: It is important to note that while the Democratic Party has engaged in gerrymandering, Republicans have similarly employed these tactics when they have been in power. This cyclical nature of gerrymandering reflects the ongoing struggle for political dominance in the state.
26 Sep 2026 12:42 pm
ROG62 » Today, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ Historical Gerrymandering in MissouriGerrymandering in Missouri has a long history, with both major political parties engaging in the practice when they hold power. This manipulation of district boundaries aims to favor one party over another, often leading to significant electoral advantages.Democratic Party PracticesHistorical Context
- Consolidation of Voters: When the Democratic Party has been in control, they have often redrawn district lines to consolidate Democratic voters in specific areas. This strategy aims to create "safe" districts where Democratic candidates have a higher chance of winning.
- Dilution of Influence: In addition to consolidating voters, Democrats have also diluted their influence in other districts. This involves spreading Democratic voters across multiple districts to minimize their overall electoral power.
ConclusionOverall, gerrymandering in Missouri has been a tool used by both the Democratic and Republican parties to secure electoral advantages. The historical practices of the Democratic Party illustrate a broader trend of strategic district manipulation that has characterized Missouri's political landscape.
- Electoral Competition: The practice of gerrymandering has intensified during periods of significant electoral competition in Missouri. Both parties have sought to secure their positions by manipulating district boundaries to ensure favorable outcomes in elections.
- Bipartisan Nature: It is important to note that while the Democratic Party has engaged in gerrymandering, Republicans have similarly employed these tactics when they have been in power. This cyclical nature of gerrymandering reflects the ongoing struggle for political dominance in the state.
“it’s not fair!” ///// oh poor baby 
26 Sep 2026 2:17 pm
that be you, jerritol…I’m just pointing out your non existent argument…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
26 Sep 2026 2:18 pm
cry-on jerritol….CRY-ON!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
26 Sep 2026 2:40 pm
The one the US Supreme court agreed with me???ROG62 » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ that be you, jerritol…I’m just pointing out your non existent argument…
26 Sep 2026 2:42 pm
you are the one who is crying. @ROG62
26 Sep 2026 3:07 pm
ROG62 » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ that be you, jerritol…I’m just pointing out your non existent argument…
where is the supreme court ruling in your favor?
27 Sep 2026 7:08 am
^^^^^Spoiled brat mentality^^^^^^ raised by a we believe social consensus isn't self evident time adapting in plain sight 24/7 social mind that won't tolerate anyone debunking their statistical averages with actual evolving results daily here.
27 Sep 2026 7:34 am
No, the US SUPREME COURT did NOT agree with you. WHAT IT SAID was that the VOTERS have to VOTE on the redistricting map.
OTHER than that, you got NOTHING, ****!!
Sucks, huh??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
27 Sep 2026 8:37 am
I literally don’t give a **** other than pointing out your hypocrisy…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
27 Sep 2026 8:47 am
and where did I say the new map should be used in nov?Beekeeper » Today, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ No, the US SUPREME COURT did NOT agree with you. WHAT IT SAID was that the VOTERS have to VOTE on the redistricting map.
OTHER than that, you got NOTHING, ****!!
Sucks, huh??
27 Sep 2026 1:29 pm
show the new Missouri map and the one in use nowROG62 » Yesterday, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ that be you, jerritol…I’m just pointing out your non existent argument…
27 Sep 2026 1:31 pm
the Missouri map from 2025
27 Sep 2026 5:22 pm
Neither did I, ****!!
Are you REALLY this g;'damn STUPID or did your mommy drop you on your head when you were a baby???
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
27 Sep 2026 6:02 pm
Post all of the historical gerrymandered maps by party…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
27 Sep 2026 6:05 pm
Yo mama done drop yo and then yo dada stomped on yo brainBeekeeper » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Neither did I, ****!!
Are you REALLY this g;'damn STUPID or did your mommy drop you on your head when you were a baby???
27 Sep 2026 6:06 pm
Beekeeper » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Neither did I, ****!!
Are you REALLY this g;'damn STUPID or did your mommy drop you on your head when you were a baby???
////No, the US SUPREME COURT did NOT agree with you. WHAT IT SAID was that the VOTERS have to VOTE on the redistricting map./////
Who is online
In total there are 3444 users online :: 5 registered, 14 bots, and 3425 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Bolt, ADmantX, CriteoBot, proximic, GPTBot, LCC, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot