Liberal Forum

AI OverviewIn 1980, the definition of woman in Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary was "an adult female person." [1, 2]
Details of the 1980 Definition

• Primary Sense (1a): An adult female person.

• Secondary Sense (1b): A woman belonging to a particular category (such as by birth, residence, membership, or occupation, usually used in combination like councilwoman).

• Additional Senses: Womankind, or a distinctively feminine nature/womanliness.

Female:


AI OverviewIn 1980, Webster's dictionary (specifically the prevailing editions of the era, such as the 8th edition of Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary) defined female primarily in biological and reproductive terms: as an individual or organism that bears young or produces eggs. [1]
Historical Definition (c. 1980)

• As an Adjective/Noun: Defined fundamentally as of, relating to, or being the sex that produces offspring, conceives, or bears young and produces eggs (as distinguished from the male, which performs the fertilizing function).

Noticeably different is "feels like" or "identifies as".

 

#1 MAGA issue..

Bunch of **** lonely sexually frustrated closet homosexual brainwashed idiotic incels..

@SouthernFried   is Exhibit 47...
 
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=6gluN ... rhWrj4AHlZ

JohnnyYou » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

#1 MAGA issue..

Bunch of **** lonely sexually frustrated closet homosexual brainwashed idiotic incels..

@SouthernFried   is Exhibit 47...
 
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=6gluN ... rhWrj4AHlZ

hey johnny, how’s that claim on 

“A small percentage of humanity has an x and a y chromosome..”
                                           johnny, circa September, 2026

working out for ya?
 

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 6:06 pm

#1 MAGA issue..

Bunch of **** lonely sexually frustrated closet homosexual brainwashed idiotic incels..

@SouthernFried   is Exhibit 47...
 
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=6gluN ... rhWrj4AHlZ

 

Wrong.  I don't give a **** if you want to put on a dress, panties, and high heels and prance around the eastern shore.  Have it.  With that said, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms.  In your younger version of Johnny stay out of competitive female sports after puberty.

Marry whomever the **** you want.  

So back to the old definition.  I take it you don't agree with it?

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

Wrong.  I don't give a **** if you want to put on a dress, panties, and high heels and prance around the eastern shore.  Have it.  With that said, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms.  In your younger version of Johnny stay out of competitive female sports after puberty.

Marry whomever the **** you want.  

So back to the old definition.  I take it you don't agree with it?

The firemen used to hold an annual cross dressing contest in St Michael's back in the day for fundraising..

Johnny » wrote:

03 Feb 1970, 6:06 pm

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

Wrong.  I don't give a **** if you want to put on a dress, panties, and high heels and prance around the eastern shore.  Have it.  With that said, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms.  In your younger version of Johnny stay out of competitive female sports after puberty.

Marry whomever the **** you want.  

So back to the old definition.  I take it you don't agree with it?

The firemen used to hold an annual cross dressing contest in St Michael's back in the day for fundraising..

 

SO?  Good for them.  That's an occasional thing.  Were they trying to piss in women's restroom and compete in their competitive sports?
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:39 am

#1 MAGA issue..

Bunch of **** lonely sexually frustrated closet homosexual brainwashed idiotic incels..

@SouthernFried   is Exhibit 47...
 
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=6gluN ... rhWrj4AHlZ

It's a pretty big RELIGIOUS issue, you **** idiot - not just a political one.

"Male and female created He them."

You arrogant dick suckers are **** with the Creation Story. Teaching blasphemy to children makes decent parents angry - no matter how many indecent parents defend it, you fat, gay chlamidia donor.
 
 

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

Wrong.  I don't give a **** if you want to put on a dress, panties, and high heels and prance around the eastern shore.  Have it.  With that said, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms.  In your younger version of Johnny stay out of competitive female sports after puberty.

Marry whomever the **** you want.  

So back to the old definition.  I take it you don't agree with it?

This is what I did not understand - and what you still don't. What you just ceded - this? ^ - is the ballgame, son.

Society qua society has rights. Rights that OVER-RULE the individual. And before that knee has time to jerk and before you have time to holler soshalizum, allow me to back up my point with the fact that the Founders themselves included Emminent Domain in the Constitution. They gave society AS SOCIETY and not as anything EXCEPT society (the **** tribe - sooory) the right to take YOUR **** that YOU worked for and YOU own. Whether you like it or not. And then society remunerates you as it sees fit. This puts the interests of society ABOVE the interests of the individual - per the Founding Comnists.

So we always had a right to keep them down - for the good of society. Emminent Domain. And their current behavior demonstrates that we were absolutely retarded to STOP keeping them down. By saying that you don't care if they openly and publicly show their *** to God and His creatures, you give away the ballgame - just as I did, for decades.

I say put them back in that closet and put some heavy penalties on sticking a toe out of it. ALWAYS distinguish exercising liberty from being libertine. And recognize that there are women and children COUNTING on us being man enough to look queers in the eye untli THEY look at their feet. That OP? It's you agreeing to look at your feet, if they'll just be "this" decent and just be "that" decent. 

**** that. They'll be all the way decent, or they get the boot. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

Wrong.  I don't give a **** if you want to put on a dress, panties, and high heels and prance around the eastern shore.  Have it.  With that said, stay out of women's bathrooms and locker rooms.  In your younger version of Johnny stay out of competitive female sports after puberty.

Marry whomever the **** you want.  

So back to the old definition.  I take it you don't agree with it?

This is what I did not understand - and what you still don't. What you just ceded - this? ^ - is the ballgame, son.

Society qua society has rights. Rights that OVER-RULE the individual. And before that knee has time to jerk and before you have time to holler soshalizum, allow me to back up my point with the fact that the Founders themselves included Emminent Domain in the Constitution. They gave society AS SOCIETY and not as anything EXCEPT society (the **** tribe - sooory) the right to take YOUR **** that YOU worked for and YOU own. Whether you like it or not. And then society remunerates you as it sees fit. This puts the interests of society ABOVE the interests of the individual - per the Founding Comnists.

So we always had a right to keep them down - for the good of society. Emminent Domain. And their current behavior demonstrates that we were absolutely retarded to STOP keeping them down. By saying that you don't care if they openly and publicly show their *** to God and His creatures, you give away the ballgame - just as I did, for decades.

I say put them back in that closet and put some heavy penalties on sticking a toe out of it. ALWAYS distinguish exercising liberty from being libertine. And recognize that there are women and children COUNTING on us being man enough to look queers in the eye untli THEY look at their feet. That OP? It's you agreeing to look at your feet, if they'll just be "this" decent and just be "that" decent. 

**** that. They'll be all the way decent, or they get the boot. 
 
 
 

 

The op is the biological, scientific, non woke definition of what a woman is.

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

The op is the biological, scientific, non woke definition of what a woman is.

Did I challenge the definition?

Or did I challenge your offer to be cucked by ***?

If you let these people kiss in front of your kids or grandkids, you're cucked. 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

The op is the biological, scientific, non woke definition of what a woman is.

Did I challenge the definition? Did I even mention it?

Or did I challenge your offer to be cucked by ***?

If you let these people kiss in front of your kids or grandkids, you're cucked. 
 
And I say that as one who is cucked by the law, and was cucked by himself for decades.

I'm not judging. I am in no position to judge you in the matter.

I'm arguing a case against your libertine utterances. It's time we stand.
 

 

I have never given a **** about any of that, with the exceptions I posted.  

Ohio State's Line Up looks like 100% African American..

They are slammin' Illinois 35 to 13..

Whie men can't  football..
 

Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

I have never given a **** about any of that, with the exceptions I posted.

I know. 

And I am making an argument that you should. 

Did you consider my argument? Do you consider it in error?

We would not have this **** going on if we had kept our foot on their necks. Taking our boot off their necks is DIRECTLY related to the current state of affairs. Your post suggests that they can be bargained with. That we can agree that they get to show their entire *** but they cannot spread their cheeks while aiming it at us. How has that with been working out?
 

Cannonpointer » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

I know. 

And I am making an argument that you should. 

Did you consider my argument? Do you consider it in error?

We would not have this **** going on if we had kept our foot on their necks. Taking our boot off their necks is DIRECTLY related to the current state of affairs. Your post suggests that they can be bargained with. That we can agree that they get to show their entire *** but they cannot spread their cheeks while aiming it at us. How has that with been working out?

Male Chauvanism was a big topic of discussion  amongst the adults in my childhood..

The women are off the leash.. Deal with it..

I think it a change for the better personally..

A woman can talk twice as fast as a man can think. Two heads vs Four Lips..

.

 

Cannonpointer » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:46 pm

I have never given a **** about any of that, with the exceptions I posted.

I know. 

And I am making an argument that you should. 

Did you consider my argument? Do you consider it in error?

We would not have this **** going on if we had kept our foot on their necks. Taking our boot off their necks is DIRECTLY related to the current state of affairs. Your post suggests that they can be bargained with. That we can agree that they get to show their entire *** but they cannot spread their cheeks while aiming it at us. How has that with been working out?
 

 

I am not arguing.  Nothing about.  I am more of a 60's type liberal than many of the dumbasses here.  
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:15 pm

It's a pretty big RELIGIOUS issue, you **** idiot - not just a political one.

"Male and female created He them."

You arrogant dick suckers are **** with the Creation Story. Teaching blasphemy to children makes decent parents angry - no matter how many indecent parents defend it, you fat, gay chlamidia donor.

Quarks are all that matter at The Church of The Quantum  Gurus.

Thanks for reminding  me religion is involved.. SNA PHOO!