
Was this coast guard vessel off the shore of Ecuador or still in international waters being a free trade zone?nefarious101 » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Time to get busy....
anything cartel should be a target from now on
Chinooks are surging in troops
sole » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Was this coast guard vessel off the shore of Ecuador or still in international waters being a free trade zone?

SouthernFried » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ask yourself. Who does the American liberal root for in this scenario? The Coast Guard, or the Mexican cartel.
We all know damn well it's the latter.

The one in the OP was involved Mexico cartels not he CG vessel was on the Rio Grande:sole » Today, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑Was this coast guard vessel off the shore of Ecuador or still in international waters being a free trade zone?nefarious101 » Today, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ Time to get busy....
anything cartel should be a target from now on
Chinooks are surging in troops
your 2 posts add up to some one creating an issue.
heard the CG massively lit up the area from where the shots came fromHuey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The one in the OP was involved Mexico cartels not he CG vessel was on the Rio Grande:
Hundreds of American troops are heading to the Rio Grande Valley after a shooting incident against the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) this past weekend, believed to be cartel-connected, occurred in the vicinity of Garceno, a Texas town close to the U.S.-Mexico border.
No USCG personnel were injured nor was any of their equipment damaged when the gunfire was sent their way and then returned on Saturday, September 26, a USCG spokesperson told The Texan on Friday
https://thetexan.news/issues/immigratio ... bfc6f.html

The articles I saw weren't very clear on that. And of course someone will come by and say it is a false flag.nefarious101 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑heard the CG massively lit up the area from where the shots came fromHuey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The one in the OP was involved Mexico cartels not he CG vessel was on the Rio Grande:
Hundreds of American troops are heading to the Rio Grande Valley after a shooting incident against the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) this past weekend, believed to be cartel-connected, occurred in the vicinity of Garceno, a Texas town close to the U.S.-Mexico border.
No USCG personnel were injured nor was any of their equipment damaged when the gunfire was sent their way and then returned on Saturday, September 26, a USCG spokesperson told The Texan on Friday
https://thetexan.news/issues/immigratio ... bfc6f.html
but couldn't tell if any got killed or how many got killed
Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The articles I saw weren't very clear on that. And of course someone will come by and say it is a false flag.

if the actions took place on the coast of Ecuador, then why do people take a leap of faith and claim it was a Mexican cartel? I call **** on this thread.SouthernFried » Today, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Ask yourself. Who does the American liberal root for in this scenario? The Coast Guard, or the Mexican cartel.
We all know damn well it's the latter.
sole » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ if the actions took place on the coast of Ecuador, then why do people take a leap of faith and claim it was a Mexican cartel? I call **** on this thread.
what separates a river's edge and a shoreline coast of a lake, sea, ocean?
When words mean things factually, they aren't definitive of actual time evolving in genetic biological positions of current global human population as a whole species.

which side of evolving am I discussing in actual time alive since each person's personal conception at becoming part of the species in this atmosphere date of birth, for the record of human behavior history controls people with cradle to grave by mind over matter, context over content of chromosomes of each lifetimes DNA sequence of arrivals existed one at a time so far.nefarious101 » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Who cares?...call ****....that's your usual contribution anyway