Cannonpointer » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The latter is proper. The former is now "acceptable", but ONLY because even grammar nazis are being forced to judge this idiocracy's Enlish on a sliding scale.
Stupid. post. Dogs talk in their sleep. dogs can snore, growl, yip, bark. but they can also be quite. no if's and's, or but's about it.jerra b » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ which iscorrect, if the dog was asleep he was quiet, or if the dog were asleep he was quiet,
or if the dog were asleep. he were quiet,
my dog is asleep right now and he is quiet,sole » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stupid. post. Dogs talk in their sleep. dogs can snore, growl, yip, bark. but they can also be quite. no if's and's, or but's about it.
evolving changes everything in series parallel time. It hasn't reached rem sleep yet. next you will say there is no study to validate dogs can reach rem sleep?
Dogs dream.sole » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ evolving changes everything in series parallel time. It hasn't reached rem sleep yet. next you will say there is no study to validate dogs can reach rem sleep?
Your mental conscience doesn't navigate beyond the ideologies you are willing to die for to stay in character born to buried so you stick with rules of grammar and single topic debate living in a series parallel time alive as genetically present environment.
Gee I was saying that same thing was common knowledge when animals recognize how proportionate to life they are within their own beating heart and brain navigating around everything outside their flesh now.
It was an example sentence, //////sole » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stupid. post. Dogs talk in their sleep. dogs can snore, growl, yip, bark. but they can also be quite. no if's and's, or but's about it.
It was an example sentence not a scientific statement, //////sole » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Gee I was saying that same thing was common knowledge when animals recognize how proportionate to life they are within their own beating heart and brain navigating around everything outside their flesh now.
Neither is good. Both will slide. Replacing "was" with "would be" would make the meaning of both sentences easier to grasp.jerrab » Today, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑The boy was quiet if only the dog was asleep or the boy was quiet only if the dog were asleep.
I got called away with hitting submit, and when I did hit submit, you had changed the post.jerrab » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ which iscorrect, if the dog was asleep he was quiet, or if the dog were asleep he was quiet,
or if the dog were asleep. he were quiet,
2 separate postsCannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I got called away with hitting submit, and when I did hit submit, you had changed the post.
Where is the boy? Be honest - where is he? Have you lent him to one of your democrat friends for sex?
RebelGator » Yesterday, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ Said Mr. Ebonics....'were made' would be the correct usage.
This thread, administered and referenced by the board retards, is a complete failure.
ROG62 » Yesterday, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ And yet, you still knew what was meant…
your posts? Sole levels…
167 all the weigh..
semantics to fit social narratives at dividing the whole species into socialized parts governed by ideas instead of honoring the universal balance sustaining ancestral lineages daily.jerra b » Today, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ It was an example sentence for grammar////
AI Overview
A grammatically correct example sentence is "The quick brown dog jumped over the fence", which follows the standard English rules for word order, subject, and action
Hear an idea? You listen to nothingness..sole » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ semantics to fit social narratives at dividing the whole species into socialized parts governed by ideas instead of honoring the universal balance sustaining ancestral lineages daily.
some call it Karma.
here is an idea about nurturing over natural time displaced, when people train last generation to perform as previous 6 generations have in the last two centuries, why do ancestors hope the corrupt enabled throughout history will end next generation.
I watch the nothingness your social we the people won't accept in your own time being alive in series parallel space of total sum genetic events from the conclusion of conceptions added so far as events evolving forward as a whole population inhabiting space now.
Now do Lawrence, Ma.Huey » Today, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ You want to call people crackers? Here is the racial makeup of Salem, NH.
AI Overview
The racial and ethnic demographics of Salem, New Hampshire, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, are predominantly White: Not much diversity in your town.