I was %100 percent on objective facts. DB posted a false tweet in an article on Monday to use the article to hammer fox.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How do you "win" by being wrong about objective facts you refuse to acknowledge?
Here we go again.Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was %100 percent on objective facts. DB posted a false tweet in an article on Monday to use the article to hammer fox.
Don't get any more factual than that.
Don't know anything about that either,So is FOX spinning this Guilfoyle thing as evidence of the incorruptibility of the Grifty administration?
And away he goes....Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Here we go again.Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was %100 percent on objective facts. DB posted a false tweet in an article on Monday to use the article to hammer fox.
Don't get any more factual than that.
There was nothing "false" about the tweet.
In fact, here's the response of a FOX dependent slack jaw - as of 2;08 pm on the 11th - when asked as follows:Don't know anything about that either,So is FOX spinning this Guilfoyle thing as evidence of the incorruptibility of the Grifty administration?
I'd say that pretty much nails someone's dick to the wall.
how do objective facts compare to subjective facts? Person asking about theories and theologies and separate person answering with what they believe is true.Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How do you "win" by being wrong about objective facts you refuse to acknowledge?
Another aspect that is being ignored is that when a conservative screws up like this, we expect them to be fired, taken off a ballot, and face the consequences. When a Democrat screws up, they want to keep them on the job or on the ballot simply for power.Beekeeper » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
GO **** YOURSELF, ****!!!
I read the WHOLE DAMN THING. IT's YOU that didn't read it!!
Because FOX NEWS reported on it, and did so WITH ALL THE FACTS, you seem to think you have some "gotcha" here.
YOU LOST, CUPCAKE!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Huey » Today, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Another aspect that is being ignored is that when a conservative screws up like this, we expect them to be fired, taken off a ballot, and face the consequences. When a Democrat screws up, they want to keep them on the job or on the ballot simply for power.
Huey » Today, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Another aspect that is being ignored is that when a conservative screws up like this, we expect them to be fired, taken off a ballot, and face the consequences. When a Democrat screws up, they want to keep them on the job or on the ballot simply for power.
His buddy Reba is gonna get the grass cutting contract for The Arch.
The story broke last Thursday...Beekeeper » 58 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Where **** has a problem HERE is that Fox News COVERED THE STORY and he refuses to admit it!!
Why do you try to bluff?Beekeeper » Today, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ GO **** YOURSELF, ****!!!
I read the WHOLE DAMN THING. IT's YOU that didn't read it!!
Because FOX NEWS reported on it, and did so WITH ALL THE FACTS, you seem to think you have some "gotcha" here.
YOU LOST, CUPCAKE!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yup Quid Pro QuoBlackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-veter ... -guilfoyle
Fox Veteran Shames Network for ‘Malpractice’ Over Guilfoyle
“Fox has 0 reporting online about this,” he wrote on X, saying the network’s last article mentioning Guilfoyle dated Dec. 10, 2024, when Trump announced her nomination.
The veteran executive praised Fox’s sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, for exposing a series of allegations against Guilfoyle, including claims she solicited via text messages $100,000 from MAGA donor Eric Deters with no paper trail to pay off an American Express bill.
For a sense of scale...
Her MONTHLY AMEX bill is 2x Hunter's alleged retainer from.Burisma.
The emails make EXPLICIT references to "Pay to Play".
So why would FOX not report on its "sister publication's scoop?
action is equal to reaction is the same thing as quid pro quo mirrored behavior from all sides and all realities practicing the same narrative different ways and means.*Roshambo » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yup Quid Pro Quo
also
Re: If You Wonder Why MAGAts Aren't Talking Guilfoyle.....
I don't, I know.
Blackvegetable » Today, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The story broke last Thursday...
What did FOX have to say about it BEFORE being called out?
Kimberly Guilfoyle reportedly begged Trump donor to pay her $100K credit card bill: WSJByHeather Miller
FOX Local
Politics
Published October 8, 2026 10:24 AM ED
Kimberly Guilfoyle reportedly begged Trump donor to pay her $100K credit card bill: WSJ | LiveNOW from FOX
So NOT EVEN 12 HOURS went by before FOX NEWS posted their story!!
So SHOW ME ANY "rule" that REQUIRES a NEWS OUTLET to post something in 11.2 SECONDS a story breaks somewhere else!!! Oh that's right, your TDS INVENTS THEM as you go, right cupcake??Published Oct 12, 2026 5:04AM EDT
FOX Local.Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ PLENTY, ****!!
The WSJ broke their story ...
So NOT EVEN 24 HOURS went by before FOX NEWS posted their story!!
And when did Daily Beastiality publish THEIR ****??
So SHOW ME ANY "rule" that REQUIRES a NEWS OUTLET to post something in 11.2 SECONDS a story breaks somewhere else!!! Oh that's right, your TDS INVENTS THEM as you go, right cupcake??
See, BITCH SLAPPING YOU IS SOOOOO **** EASY, ****!!
Take that BLOODY STUMP OUT OF YOUR *** BEFORE YOU TRY TO WALK!!! Or RUN as you ALWAYS DO!!
Chase me.
That's STILL FOX NEWS, *******!!! And they're a FREE STREAMING of the service AS WELL. AND it gives access to companion streaming networks like LiveNow from Fox, Fox Weather, and Fox Soul.
What did FOX tell Daily Beast?