Another questions you ran from. The other day when you returned from your self imposed sabbatical you asked what the five was saying about her. I asked you if you watch them everyday at the gym why are you asking me? Is that another of your lies?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑They did.Huey » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ My work is done. You tells us why they did not post that indeed, fox did post an online store BEFORE their article was written. That is all that matters, now.
PS. I told you what was wrong with the story.
It isn't.
You haven't.
Start a thread.
Learn to read.Huey » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ My work is done. You tells us why they did not post that indeed, fox did post an online store BEFORE their article was written.
See the ******. See the ****** run. Suddenly thread integrity is important to the Princess.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑Start a thread.Huey » Yesterday, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑Another questions you ran from. The other day when you returned from your self imposed sabbatical you asked what the five was saying about her. I asked you if you watch them everyday at the gym why are you asking me? Is that another of your lies?
Than what?Huey » Yesterday, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ See the ******. See the ****** run. Suddenly thread integrity is important to the Princess.
Which, as I posted, are not an affiliate under different ownership. FOX owns them.Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2026, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑FOX Local.Beekeeper » 13 Oct 2026, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ PLENTY, ****!!
The WSJ broke their story ...
So NOT EVEN 24 HOURS went by before FOX NEWS posted their story!!
And when did Daily Beastiality publish THEIR ****??
So SHOW ME ANY "rule" that REQUIRES a NEWS OUTLET to post something in 11.2 SECONDS a story breaks somewhere else!!! Oh that's right, your TDS INVENTS THEM as you go, right cupcake??
See, BITCH SLAPPING YOU IS SOOOOO **** EASY, ****!!
Take that BLOODY STUMP OUT OF YOUR *** BEFORE YOU TRY TO WALK!!! Or RUN as you ALWAYS DO!!
Chase me.
I guess they finally updated it. They should known that BEFORE posting the story.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑Learn to read.Huey » Yesterday, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ My work is done. You tells us why they did not post that indeed, fox did post an online store BEFORE their article was written.
In response, a Fox News spokeswoman told the Daily Beast that the network covered the allegations on its TV output last Thursday as part of a wider report on Trump, and on its social media channel...
As the controversy ballooned, Fox eventually covered it.
At 6:55 p.m. ET Sunday, the network published a report detailing the allegations against Guilfoyle and the possibility of her dismissal.
Less than an hour later, LaCorte acknowledged the development and shared the Fox report with his followers. “Good to see Fox has now gotten around to it ...” he wrote.
Spoiled Princess, you can't know how **** amusing it is to watch you whine about diversions.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑Than what?Huey » Yesterday, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ See the ******. See the ****** run. Suddenly thread integrity is important to the Princess.
Indulging yet another of your diversions?
I've seen you...Huey » Yesterday, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Spoiled Princess, you can't know how **** amusing it is to watch you whine about diversions.
Pot, meet kettle. You are one hypocritical ****.
No...Huey » Yesterday, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess they finally updated it. They should known that BEFORE posting the story.
Why did it take you so long to post that? Very odd. And where is the link?
they knew everything they needed to know to post that story.They should known that BEFORE posting the story.
Why did it take you so long to post that?
At the time you posted that there was no update. None. And the fox online article was written a day before that one. And they did not mention.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑No...Huey » Yesterday, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess they finally updated it. They should known that BEFORE posting the story.
Why did it take you so long to post that? Very odd. And where is the link?
You never bothered to read it..
As I said...they knew everything they needed to know to post that story.They should known that BEFORE posting the story.Why did it take you so long to post that?
How many times did I tell you to read it?
It isn't an update.
Yup, you have. But, I have not seen you. Which makes you the ******.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑I've seen you...Huey » Yesterday, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Spoiled Princess, you can't know how **** amusing it is to watch you whine about diversions.
Pot, meet kettle. You are one hypocritical ****.
You have.Huey » Yesterday, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, you have. But, I have not seen you. Which makes you the ******.
No ******, you have never posted a picture that includes your face. So no, have never seen you.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑You have.Huey » Yesterday, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, you have. But, I have not seen you. Which makes you the ******.
You lie about everything.
Huey » Yesterday, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Which, as I posted, are not an affiliate under different ownership. FOX owns them.
You are more than welcome to come within 33 miles of me and discuss stumps, meltdown Mary.
That's another lie.Huey » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No ******, you have never posted a picture that includes your face.
Kimberbyebye..
I Have never seen it. Anybody else seen this? YOU always hid your identity because YOU were scared your alleged clients would find out what your real political beliefs are. You told me that when you posted an alleged pic of you, from behind, playing golf at Sawgrass.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑That's another lie.Huey » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No ******, you have never posted a picture that includes your face.
Why do you presume to do this?Huey » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I Have never seen it. Anybody else seen this? YOU always hid your identity because YOU were scared your alleged clients would find out what your real political beliefs are.