There's The Retelling...Huey » Yesterday, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't run. I gave you the tools necessary to get your answer. Not my fault you are too lazy to your own work, Princess. I don't do YOUR bidding.
Don't know anything about that either, Psycho Stalker. You'll have to go do your own homework for a change.
GO look for yourself: https://www.foxnews.com
You tell me and and tell me when. This is your straw man distraction.
Bruce isn't my problem...Cannonpointer » Today, 12:43 am » wrote: ↑ Any broad willing to put THAT much collagen in her lips - so much that the first thing I think when I google her is "I could use a blow job" - has earned an indulgence. And fox has ALSO earned an indulgence - not from me, but from you. Fox has cosigned your silly *** idea that Bruce Jenner is a woman. You should be granting them a certain amount of woke *** respect.
nefarious101 » Yesterday, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Run with it Dickhead...
we are more concerned about bludgeoning the Leftists into submission...doing a real fine job of it too
now you do your little Guilfoyle story...
puff out your chest with pride and march around grandma's coffee table like a big boy
You NEVER want to talk about the IMPORTANT ****, ****!! Like this and WHY are you supporting a PEDOPHILE??Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-veter ... -guilfoyle
Fox Veteran Shames Network for ‘Malpractice’ Over Guilfoyle
“Fox has 0 reporting online about this,” he wrote on X, saying the network’s last article mentioning Guilfoyle dated Dec. 10, 2024, when Trump announced her nomination.
The veteran executive praised Fox’s sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, for exposing a series of allegations against Guilfoyle, including claims she solicited via text messages $100,000 from MAGA donor Eric Deters with no paper trail to pay off an American Express bill.
For a sense of scale...
Her MONTHLY AMEX bill is 2x Hunter's alleged retainer from.Burisma.
The emails make EXPLICIT references to "Pay to Play".
So why would FOX not report on its "sister publication's scoop?
List what you consider "important ****"....
What do the sources you are too ashamed to name tell you is important?nefarious101 » Yesterday, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Run with it Dickhead...
we are more concerned about bludgeoning the Leftists into submission...doing a real fine job of it too
now you do your little Guilfoyle story...
puff out your chest with pride and march around grandma's coffee table like a big boy
Blackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What do the sources you are too ashamed to name tell you is important?
You're a moron.Beekeeper » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ UNLIKE you, ****, we don't need ANYONE or ANY SOURCE telling us what's "important"!!
****!!
Blackvegetable » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What do the sources you are too ashamed to name tell you is important?

Of course...nefarious101 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Must be the right sources Dickhead since I'm always right
Notice how I know thing as they happen and 6 months later fake news still hasn't clued you in
that make you an Low Information Dickhead
No....never.Notice how I know thing as they happen
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Of course...
**** idiot.
No....never.
Can you post an example?

That's a zero.nefarious101 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ sure Dickhead
Example 1....I knew you were a dickhead before you figured it out
Example 2...I knew the Russia Russia Russia hoax was fake news years before you did
Example 3...I know what a woman is....you still don't have that one figured out
the list is long there's a whole lot more
Here you go Dickhead...
