https://www.thedailybeast.com/kaitlan-c ... mpty-seatsConservativeWave » Yesterday, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ DOES it REALLY take a ROCKET scientist?
Donald Trump is holding election rallies EVERY DAY... and they're ALL PACKED !! ...
HA!! It's REALLY RICH for Democrats to point a finger at a few empty seats (and only at a few venues)... when MOST of the rally's have seen HUGE CROWDS, with lines for 100 yards... OUT THE DOOR... at a DOZEN locations, ALL OVER America ! ESPECIALLY when we HAVEN'T even seen a Democrat making a campaign speech, with even a FRACTION of a crowd like Trumps !
Hitler drew bigger crowds - so did the ayatollah.ConservativeWave » 13 Oct 2026, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ DOES it REALLY take a ROCKET scientist?
Donald Trump is holding election rallies EVERY DAY... and they're ALL PACKED !! ...WHILE DEMOCRATS?... You HAVEN'T EVEN heard a PEEP from most Democrat candidates... and that goes DOUBLE for Talarico (in Texas) who DISAPPEARED for a 10 DAYS... AND NOW, the story coming out now is that he had a nervous BREAK DOWN !!
1) Ilhan Omar's house... RAIDED by FEDS... because they think she became a U.S. citizens under questionable circumstances) !
2) The Democrat candidate in Michigan (el Saied) is LEAKING OIL... The RACE is CLOSE where Republicans haven't won in DECADES !
3) AND, in MAINE... a Democrats state where it looks like Susan Collins is winning... in a rece that will be the 1st announces in Election night !
NOT TO MENTION... 1) ALL the Democrat related FRAUD, CORRUPTION, LIES... that TRUMP uncovered, 2) DEMOCRATS supporting Marxists, Socialists, Communists, and Islamist's candidates, NATION WIDE ! 3) Another SCANDAL involving another sitting Democrats is poping up daily, AND, 4) Democrats candidates being EXTREMELY QUIET ?
AND ALL ALONG... the ONLY POSITIVE news for Democrats are the "Election Polls", ELECTION POLLS that have been WRONG, every elections cycle, for the last 30 YEARS !!!
MY OPINION? BEND OVER Democrats !!
Most of the voters - myself included - were extremely happy about Trump's promises to start no new wars, to bring the epstein pervs to justice, and to fix the economy.
HA!! WHAT a bunch of BS...
Trump is ABSOLUTELY following thru on his promises... With enemies all over the planet, TRUMP had to do something to PROTECT America ! as follows:Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Most of the voters - myself included - were extremely happy about Trump's promises to start no new wars, to bring the epstein pervs to justice, and to fix the economy.
If the midterms become a plebiscite on Trump's performance as measured against Trump's promises, we can look for a divided government and a lame duck president moving forward.
Hitler drew bigger crowds - so did the ayatollah.ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑HA!! WHAT a bunch of BS...
Spoken like a TRULY DERANGED Democrat !!
1) Hitler & the Ayatolla rallied around HATE, CONQUEST, and DICTATORSHIP...
2) Trump on the other hand, about Life, Liberty, Freedom, the Constitution, and the AMERICAN WAY...
3) What Joe Biden, Obama, and MOST of the Democrat Party TODAY align themselves with... is MORE akin to Hitler & the Ayatolla, than 250 years of American FREEDOM and LIBERTY !!
You're an idiot, son. The Russians have doubled down in Ukraine, and Trump is buying their diesel and has deprived Ukraine of Starlink on behalf of Putin.ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Trump is ABSOLUTELY following thru on his promises... With enemies all over the planet, TRUMP had to do something to PROTECT America ! as follows:
1) Being OVER RUN by illegals... BORDER IS CLOSED !
2) Being OVER RUN by Drug Lords... America cites are the safest in 100 years !
3) Being THREATENED by a OIL RICH and NUCLEAR Iran... In progress, but America is in control !
4) Being THREATENED Economically by an IMPERIALISTIC China... Tariffs did the TRICK, and made America STRONGER in the process ! and
5) Being Threatened by a SUDDENLY AGGRESSIVE Russia... Russia is now wishing they had NEVER invaded Ukraine !
EACH of these was GOING to be, or WAS, something America HAD to address...Donald Trump ADDRESSED EVERY ONE, with FLYING COLORS... AND, HOW MANY soldiers have we lost? 12? 13? Joe Biden lost more during a BOTCHED RETREAT from Afghanistan !!
"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor!"Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Most of the voters - myself included - were extremely happy about Trump's promises to start no new wars, to bring the epstein pervs to justice, and to fix the economy.
If the midterms become a plebiscite on Trump's performance as measured against Trump's promises, we can look for a divided government and a lame duck president moving forward.
It was Iran that declared they have enrichment of Uranium to 60%. That is easily fact checked.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑
Your lie that Iran "threatened" us merely proves your aggressive homosexuality. Not to mention, Iran is TWO WEEKS from a nuke, you **** moron.
In ANY times. We just want the signature promises. For example, if you go to the trouble of creating slogans about an issue - like calling yourself the "peace candidate," - then we look for you to keep THAT promise.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ In modern times, no President fulfills 100% of campaign promises or statements made during their terms.
This argument/claim^ is shameless and gay. Backward-engineered and niggling, gerrymandered "promises" that no one voted for being counted as a "promise kept" while WHAT THE PEOPLE **** VOTED FOR is counted as carrying equal weight is aggressively homosexual in a "defiant bottom" sort of way.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Modern Presidents: Trackers like PolitiFact show that modern presidents typically fulfill roughly 50% to 75% of their tracked campaign promises, with the rest resulting in compromises, stalled agendas, or broken pledges.
No, it means I am not voting in the midterms or ever again. I cannot vote for child molesters, and let's be honest. That means either party. There still 23 states where boy compete and shower with girls., California still houses sex-criminal men in women's prison cells. All of this could be put to route at the federal level, and the repukes control everything. They're SLOW WALKING IT. They're in on it. I'm done - it's all over except the cussing, ****.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like the House will flip, Senate is iffy.
You didn't get what you wanted, does that mean you are on the DSA bandwagon?
That's disappointing, waving the white flag like that.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑
No, it means I am not voting in the midterms or ever again. I cannot vote for child molesters, and let's be honest. That means either party. There still 23 states where boy compete and shower with girls., California still houses sex-criminal men in women's prison cells. All of this could be put to route at the federal level, and the repukes control everything. They're SLOW WALKING IT. They're in on it. I'm done - it's all over except the cussing, ****.
That's not weapons grade. That is easily fact checked.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ It was Iran that declared they have enrichment of Uranium to 60%. That is easily fact checked.
So in a five mile race, they were a mile out.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Uranium enriched to 60% is more than 80% of the way done in terms of the actual work required, even though the raw percentage number looks lower.
How Enrichment Actually Works
Uranium enrichment is not linear. It is measured by the amount of separative work (measured in separative work units, or SWUs) required to concentrate the fissile isotope U-235 from natural levels (0.7%) up to higher grades:
• Natural to 5% (Reactor Grade): Takes roughly 55% of the total effort/separative work needed to reach 90% weapons-grade uranium.
• 5% to 20%: Takes another significant chunk of the work.
• 20% to 60%: Covers the bulk of the remaining heavy lifting.
• 60% to 90% (Weapons Grade): Requires a surprisingly small fraction of the total remaining effort—often less than 15% to 20% of the total work.
They were two weeks away from a nuke.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Once uranium is enriched to 60%, most of the mass and heavy lifting (removing the vast majority of unwanted U-238 molecules through centrifuge cascades) has already been accomplished.
Going from 60% to 90% takes a fraction of the time and far fewer centrifuge passes. Furthermore, 60% enriched uranium can already be used directly to build a nuclear explosive device (though with a lower yield than 90% weapons-grade material).
Were the sand *** lying?
No one would buy this godforsaken ****, and it is YOU who waves the white flag when you vote for promises you already know are false.Fuelman » Yesterday, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ That's disappointing, waving the white flag like that.
When does this dump go on sale?
Not being weapons grade doesn't mean a bomb can't be made with 60% Enrichment.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not weapons grade. That is easily fact checked.
So in a five mile race, they were a mile out.
They were two weeks away from a nuke.
For forty years. Right? For forty years, they were two weeks from a nuke.
Were the Christ haters lying?
I voted recently against left wing lunacy that you bring up on a regular basis here in Colorado.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ No one would buy this godforsaken ****, and it is YOU who waves the white flag when you vote for promises you already know are false.